That's a big damn ball of gas. But then again, so's my wife! Cha ching!Galliam said:The largest known star, if placed in our solar system would stretch past Saturn. Saturn almost doubles the distance from the sun to Jupiter. :0
This is my current favorite astronomical fact.
That is so damn cool! Thanks for the linkAeshi said:I see your Youtube and raise you this!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/525347
Unfortunately due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics everything you do such as breathing, converting food to energy, using a comuper or fridge is raising the entropy. Once entropy reaches it's maximum (and there is one) stars can no longer "burn" and life cannot exist as no energy can be converted from one form to the other, so your very existance is killing the universebriunj04 said:No matter how badly I or the world screws things up, in the end it doesn't really affect anything.
Very difficult is a lot better than entirely impossiblecookyy2k said:Only problem is as you get faster the force required to accelerate you gets a lot higher very quickly, We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms.aww yea said:Due to einsteins smarts n stuff we can actually travel a lot farther in the universe than it seems (time dilation and lenght contraction) but when we get back to earth MILLIONS OF YEARS will have passed, and everyone you know would be dead n stuff.
But yea you could totally reach other galaxies in a near lightspeed craft in a lifetime despite them being lightyears away from us, just make sure you dont have anyone you know or love first.
Yeah, but in this vid it was still awesome and epic and such, at least more so than now....worldruler8 said:I'm going to make you guys hate me, by showing a video of a game that failed miserably at doing what is in the said video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8dvMDFOFnA
oh agreed but our fastest achieved so far is 5.2kms[sup]-1[/sup], this is peanuts compared to 300,000kms[sup]-1[/sup] speed of light in a vacuum.aww yea said:Very difficult is a lot better than entirely impossiblecookyy2k said:Only problem is as you get faster the force required to accelerate you gets a lot higher very quickly, We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms.aww yea said:Due to einsteins smarts n stuff we can actually travel a lot farther in the universe than it seems (time dilation and lenght contraction) but when we get back to earth MILLIONS OF YEARS will have passed, and everyone you know would be dead n stuff.
But yea you could totally reach other galaxies in a near lightspeed craft in a lifetime despite them being lightyears away from us, just make sure you dont have anyone you know or love first.
This is called the Chandrasekhar limit, Anything above this will end as a neutron star or blackhole, anything below will be a white dwarf before it fizzles out unceromoniously. It currently stands at 1.4 solar masses.Valate said:Now I want to see the density scale so we know which of those will collapse into neutron stars and possibly 'black holes'.
hahahah oh..... thats really depressing. I wish you didn't remind me how backward we still are. One day. one day...cookyy2k said:oh agreed but our fastest achieved so far is 5.2kms[sup]-1[/sup], this is peanuts compared to 300,000kms[sup]-1[/sup] speed of light in a vacuum.aww yea said:Very difficult is a lot better than entirely impossiblecookyy2k said:Only problem is as you get faster the force required to accelerate you gets a lot higher very quickly, We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms.aww yea said:Due to einsteins smarts n stuff we can actually travel a lot farther in the universe than it seems (time dilation and lenght contraction) but when we get back to earth MILLIONS OF YEARS will have passed, and everyone you know would be dead n stuff.
But yea you could totally reach other galaxies in a near lightspeed craft in a lifetime despite them being lightyears away from us, just make sure you dont have anyone you know or love first.
Actually, I saw a documentary once that stated that we are capable of closing on the speed of light, but the closer we go, the slower time moves to compensate, it showed that time travel would be possible by building a train around the world, which would speed up to near lightspeed, and run for 10 years or so. By the time it stops only a week or so would have passed for the people inside, even though they were right there all the time.cookyy2k said:(snip)We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms. (snip)
The closer to the speed of light we go the slower your clock would move to a stationay observer, from your point of view time remains the same and stationary clocks move faster.John the Gamer said:Actually, I saw a documentary once that stated that we are capable of closing on the speed of light, but the closer we go, the slower time moves to compensate, it showed that time travel would be possible by building a train around the world, which would speed up to near lightspeed, and run for 10 years or so. By the time it stops only a week or so would have passed for the people inside, even though they were right there all the time.cookyy2k said:(snip)We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms. (snip)
The same idea applied to black holes; by using a spaceship to circle around the hole in a stable orbit for long enough, time would slow down and the crew would move to the future.
Sadly I can't remember the name, but I think it was on National Geographic.
I wouldn't want to be in the country the train passes through when something goes wrong and it crashes though, an object crashing into the ground at near-lightspeed would blow up the entire continent, or worse I guess.
That was Stephen Hawkings Into The Universe. And he said the train was impossible to make.John the Gamer said:Actually, I saw a documentary once that stated that we are capable of closing on the speed of light, but the closer we go, the slower time moves to compensate, it showed that time travel would be possible by building a train around the world, which would speed up to near lightspeed, and run for 10 years or so. By the time it stops only a week or so would have passed for the people inside, even though they were right there all the time.cookyy2k said:(snip)We cannot produce the forces needed to get near light speed on anything much bigger than a few atoms. (snip)
The same idea applied to black holes; by using a spaceship to circle around the hole in a stable orbit for long enough, time would slow down and the crew would move to the future.
Sadly I can't remember the name, but I think it was on National Geographic.
I wouldn't want to be in the country the train passes through when something goes wrong and it crashes though, an object crashing into the ground and near-lightspeed would blow up the entire continent, or worse I guess.