This is Blockbuster UK, who are separate to the now dead Blockbuster America, but they're circling the drain mighty fine as well.Zeh Don said:Two things really surprised me about this in particular.
1. Blockbuster is still around, and is accepting Pre-orders of Xbones.
2. Blockbuster is still around, and is accepting Pre-orders of Xbones.
It's not so secret if we've been doing it since the day of the reveal.Adam Jensen said:I really love how we all secretly decided to call that thing the Xbone.
Perhaps you're a bit spoiled because of the relativity, but many people are surprised for a good reason. They went bankrupt in 2010 and were pressured by the US government to liquidate most of their assets. Now, 3 years later in 2013, they were bought out by Dish Network and have roughly only 500 stores left in the US. While 500 may be a lot and it's certainly not a Circuit City scenario, it's that much less of presence considering just three years ago there were 3,300 stores, and that most people consider Blockbuster obsolete because of Netflix and Redbox (both of which contributed greatly to Blockbuster's downfall).Exius Xavarus said:I just call it the X1. I think Xbone is just silly.krazykidd said:It's a lot better than the guys that call it OX , like it's a fucking post card . I wonder , home many people pronounce xbone as X BONE VS X B ONE . I call it the X BONE.
I'm more surprised that people are surprised that Blockbuster is still around. My grandparents have one near their house, I didn't think they were going out of business anything soon.
I don't have anything beyond that article, which, while it is true that companies patent things all the time they do not use, they also have to patent things they are going to use, and since the exact nature of how the Kinect will function on the Xbox One is still a mystery, because Microsoft keep responding to everything with we will address this issue later it is still a valid concern at this point. It's fully possible it will be given an off switch that can be activated at any time, but it doesn't look like it, and the worst case is that Microsoft could totally use it to gather brand name recognition data or even key word recognition data, or could even potentially lock a person's profile/game/movie/music to their distinct face recognition, and disable the console if others try to use the game, or are simply present in the room. That is a possibility at this stage, and with the off-the-cuff ability of companies to alter their terms of service conditions to borderline illegal levels this could even become a thing in the future once millions of people have bought them.MrWunderful said:While I agree with some points you made, a lot of things are being touted as fact around the internet when they have not been confirmed.Hero in a half shell said:snip
Microsoft has not yet stated that there will not be a way to turn the kinect sensor off in a menu or something. They have stated that it will need to be connected, however.
Everyone also assumes that they will be recording your every move, which the thought of it is not unwarranted in today's age but it is no different than any webcam/smartphone camera or eavesdropping on your cell phone or game chat for that matter.
Do you have a source that said they implicitly stated that? If so I would be curious to see it. I know they had filed a patent that allowed them to see how many people are watching something source-(http://www.gamespot.com/news/microsoft-patents-tech-that-watches-viewers-6399616) but large companies patent things all the time they never use.Hero in a half shell said:Always on camera that Microsoft talked about how it could be used to spy on people in their homes to collect advertising information or to enforce limits on the amount of people able to watch a piece of media.
I'm afraid it's a bit beyond my tech knowledge to say for sure exactly if it is possible or not, but then again Microsoft haven't really been giving us any details, just vague statements.MrWunderful said:You also state that cloud computing would be impossible which I am curious about (you seem to be educated on this subject, and I don't work with computers so maybe you can clarify for me). If it was so process intensive, wouldn't having to stream all that data of video recording from the kinect just make it even more difficult? From everyone's xbox one, all at once?
I am looking forward to this console but I am still waiting until all the details are released to make my decisions but The more educated the better!
Dandark said:My parents were talking about it and wondering if I wanted to get it all since it go incredible reviews in the paper and it got 5 stars.
Apparently it's already getting reviewed and given 5 stars just from the announcement, seems that it's marketing which is going to sell the Xbone rather than it being any good.
What about Onlive? It needs a decent connection but it's playable.Hero in a half shell said:And the consensus appears to be that you cannot send calculations away to a processing cloud server and have it return in a fast enough time to keep a game at anywhere near a decent framerate.
Cloud is interesting in that it works as long as everything suffers from the same delay, causing everything to sync up nicely. OnLive, for example, runs the entire game on it's servers, and streams a highly compressed video back to the user - making it kind of ok, but not for a game reliant on reflexes.Bad Jim said:...What about Onlive? It needs a decent connection but it's playable.
Zeh Don said:1. Blockbuster is still around, and is accepting Pre-orders of Xbones.
2. Blockbuster is still around, and is accepting Pre-orders of Xbones.
I agree to an extent. A home theater pc that can be controlled with just your arms? I could see people spending money on it and being excited for its features. Its all the rumors that are scary. 24 hour check-ins (IF Microsoft keeps them) being the big one in addition to the overly complicated install process. The best you can hope for that the system for playing games based on installs works the same as it did with disks but you can never hope this system will ever be as simple as "you have a disk, you can play it"Tom_green_day said:Wait, why do you have to be uninformed or a casual gamer to think the XO looks interesting? I'll certainly say that it intrigues me. The only reason I won't buy it is because I love my pre-owned games, and I've been with Sony the whole time so I'll stick with them despite the PS4 looking (in my opinion) nearly as irrelevant to gaming as the XO.
Let's put it this way- XO contributes nothing to actual gaming... But then again, neither does the PS4.
I'm not defending the XO, I'm just upset at the automatic flaming and ad hominem to everyone who doesn't hate the XO or Blockbuster.
I've been talking to gamers in my extended family, who nicely fit the 'outside the geek bubble' demographic, and with the exception of one cousin who works for Gamestop, there's *no* awareness of the online requirements or used game shenanigans, (about half of them were no longer interested once I told them though, the other half are seriously thrilled for voice and hand gesture remote control).Casual Shinji said:I guess this is all just to remind us there's a world outside of our geek bubble that either doesn't know or doesn't care about whatever issues the Xbox1 might have, and simply want to buy a new console.