THis. Although I do think that games about rape aren't justifiable as 'entertainment' or 'freedom of speech'.MaxTheReaper said:Just responding to the question in the OP: Because murder can be justified.
See also: Dexter.
Rape can never serve a good purpose.
And now to read.
EDIT: Well fuck. It looks like you pretty much agree completely.
That's actually a bit weird.
Or maybe it's just a more common viewpoint than I thought.
actually a holocaust tycoon has been done back in the 70's or 80's it was called KZ manager i saw it in the book SupercadeTenmar said:Just pointing out the typo.Malygris said:Rape, on the other hand, can ever be justified.
Good article. Also a holocaust tycoon? Oh man I can't even imagine the amount of controvery.
Are you answering your own question here? As I would contend you can be an anti-hero or even a tragic hero and have still raped some one. Thomas Covenant would be such a character, while from a book not a game he is still a hero is his own very flawed manner.Arrers said:You can't be the hero, but can you be the anti-hero?
No, you can't. Rape is inexusable, everyone knows that. banning any kind of media on the grounds that it normalises a crime condesends people, treating them as idiots who mimic evreything they see.
How the hell did that not cause a controversy? Well, aside from gaming not being taken seriously as a form of media back then.Doomhammer828 said:actually a holocaust tycoon has been done back in the 70's or 80's it was called KZ manager i saw it in the book SupercadeTenmar said:Just pointing out the typo.Malygris said:Rape, on the other hand, can ever be justified.
Good article. Also a holocaust tycoon? Oh man I can't even imagine the amount of controvery.
What if its child-version Hitler? Although that would explain alot about him...MaxTheReaper said:No!The infamous SCAMola said:Also, if you want to have sex with someone but they won't let you.MaxTheReaper said:...Okay, fine, rape is acceptable if you're going back in time to rape Hitler.
But that's it.
No no! Very bad!
What if that person is a child, hmm?
Think of the children, Scammy.
Hmm... ok, I see that as a valid defense. Although I personally think that a reasonable society knows where the draw the line and won't let it slip.... and one day, we'll have a reasonable societyI don't see the entertainment value in molesting people who aren't your best friend (an in-joke that none of you will get, unfortunately, because you are not her,) but then I do find the idea of murdering people strangely attractive, so maybe I'm just weird.Doug said:THis. Although I do think that games about rape aren't justifiable as 'entertainment' or 'freedom of speech'.
I guess the only defense I can think for this kind of thing is a slippery slope argument: If we allow rape to be banned, we're setting a precedent.
Eventually it would work its way to violence, then "objectional" content, etc.
Well, children aren't really human beings... so it's a bit of a non-issue.MaxTheReaper said:No!The infamous SCAMola said:Also, if you want to have sex with someone but they won't let you.MaxTheReaper said:...Okay, fine, rape is acceptable if you're going back in time to rape Hitler.
But that's it.
No no! Very bad!
What if that person is a child, hmm?
Think of the children, Scammy.
its someones choice to play rapegames, is it not?Vanguard_Ex said:Bullseye. It's your choice if you kill any civilians, like it would be in a real city, but there aren't really any consequences. Thus why it is just a game, and does not really merge with real-life.Cliff_m85 said:Technically you aren't forced to cut down civilians.WrongSprite said:I give you GTA4. Is cutting down civilians justified? Then maybe they should both be banned.MaxTheReaper said:Just responding to the question in the OP: Because murder can be justified.
See also: Dexter.
Rape can never serve a good purpose.
And now to read.
Poor rat...The_root_of_all_evil said:Made my points on this already.
Rape games should be banned until there's a reasonable counterpoint.
Game murder isn't the same as game rape because of the emotional identification. The 'walking wounded' are hardly ever portrayed for that reason, it's too damn distressing. If you just count life as an on/off switch, you can justify most forms of brutality.
(Let's face it, they've done worse to the contents of your dinner plate most nights)
But, if you can get that emotional linkage in there, suddenly murder isn't quite so easy to rationalize:
![]()
Games like Rapeplay base their game around that aspect. Once someone can come up with a way of portraying sex realistically in a game, then I'm fine for it to be portrayed pervertedly: But don't let's let the perversions come first.
You miss my point. Within the game of GTA, you choose whether or not you kill civilians, whereas this game centres solely around rape.dogstile said:its someones choice to play rapegames, is it not?Vanguard_Ex said:Bullseye. It's your choice if you kill any civilians, like it would be in a real city, but there aren't really any consequences. Thus why it is just a game, and does not really merge with real-life.Cliff_m85 said:Technically you aren't forced to cut down civilians.WrongSprite said:I give you GTA4. Is cutting down civilians justified? Then maybe they should both be banned.MaxTheReaper said:Just responding to the question in the OP: Because murder can be justified.
See also: Dexter.
Rape can never serve a good purpose.
And now to read.
anyway, why are japan banning this game when america's people are outraged, america doesn't give japan profit from rape games, so japan didn't need to try and ban it at all
"we're japan, we'll bend over, for all your needs"