I think that eating meat makes you have a better sense of humour ;-) When people are all the time telling you that you shouldn't eat meat just because... That makes me think of those people as psychos.the December King said:I think what annoys me the most about this is that usually quotes like " I love my cat and I love steaks" or "I love animals... in my belly" and such all make people who do eat meat sound like psychos. Sure, you can love your pets and enjoy eating meat, I just think there are better ways of saying it.
You seem to be under the impression that all farmers/ranchers should let animals they love die naturally, which is rediculous, you raise them, you milk them, then when they get old enough but not too old you take them to a butcher you trust, it's not as if you raise them only to kill them.CarlMinez said:I really don't know about that. I don't doubt that a farmer can have a certain affection for an animal, but if that affection isn't strong enough to keep the farmer from killing and eating the animal in question, that affection can hardly be called love.Warachia said:Yes, you can love the things you eat, sometimes you can make it a little complicated, for example, one person I knew had cows that he had to have someone else kill because he couldn't. There are plenty of people who raise and love pigs, and then eat ham, some friends I know had cows and chickens that they'd raise and then sell their meat, I can't see why you say that it has to be one or the other.CarlMinez said:Okay, so this can really be narrowed down to a semantical issue.
Does "love animals" include all animals or just a selected number of species? If the answer is all animals: no, you can't claim to love while at the same time kill and eat what you love if you have the choice not to. The very notion is preposterous. I can't claim to love puppies while eating puppies. I can't claim to have love children while eating children. You don't have to think long before realizing that one can't possible claim to have a platonic affection for a living being that you also wouldn't mind chewing and digesting.
But if you by animals mean "dogs, cats and horses" then you can probably say it without being too hypocritical.
Let's instead apply our reasoning to another example to see how ridiculous it can get. The love that people have for dogs is not mere affection, it's a good example of platonic love. If you met a person who claims to love dogs, and learn that the person in question has a habit of killing and eating his canine pets, would you take this person seriously?
I wouldn't. I would wonder which strange definition of love this sick man has and then try to find a way to forbid him from owning dogs.
Now dogs is a category of animals that humans really do love in the true definition of the term. Pigs, cows, chickens - these typed of animals are seldom loved and that's why we can treat them like we do. They are not kept as pets or animal companions, they are in the end just property.
I can promise you that if we kept pigs as pets, we would be equally upset with the idea of eating pigs. It' just proves that there is no logics behind the way we feel about eating animals. It's cultural tradition and habit, nothing else.
Amen! I love my cat, doesn't mean I will eat her! Though, if the zombie apocalypse happens, all bets are off!Dags90 said:I just can't finish a whole one by myself.
What's funny is that I don't love people as a rule, but I'm decidedly not a cannibal.
Don't mean to be rude, but can you clarify a bit? Are you suggesting that everyone who eats meat has to have the balls to butcher it themselves? I enjoy my meat products, but I just don't have the stomach for seeing blood pour out of an animal. I highly respect anyone who can handle large amounts of blood and gore professionally, whether they be a butcher or a surgeon. Does this make me a bad person?NinjaDeathSlap said:The extreme to which they took that argument was idiotic. However, I would be lying if I said that it has never pissed me off how some people can gorge themselves silly on meat without a care in the world, but will recoil in disgust if they're ever told to do so much as pluck a chicken. I mean really, how hypocritical can you get? You want to be an omnivore? Be an omnivore. But don't then act like the farmer who has to cut Miss Piggy's throat in order to put yet another bacon roll in front of you is some kind of brute.
As a vegetarian the evolution argument has always pissed me of. It's only been a few decades that daily meat intake became available to most members of western society. Before that people ate meat, but not nearly enough as they do now. It was just too hard to get meat. Eating meat was like a bonus, something that didn't happen really often, and our body was not addapted to it being normal to have meat in your daily diet. Also many people who use the evolution theorem understand jake shit about it. And even if the evolution argument wouldn't have been complete bullshit, it's not like we can't get passed our evolution. Humans weren't evolved to use smartphones either.BeeGeenie said:That's kind of beside the point.Ginger768 said:Part of our Evolution? is that a joke?...Tell me if it is i'm terrible on picking up on this stuffTanis said:That 'argument' is bad, and whoever makes it should feel bad.
We're animals, that eat meat.
It's part of our evolution, DEAL WIT IT!
![]()
You can survive without meat there's no necessity for it. The human race wouldn't end if we all became allergic to the stuff. We're omnivores, and since we live in a society that allows you to choose what you want to eat and both meat and other types of food are always available whether you eat meat or not is optional.
We have canines, we can digest meat. We are evolved to be able to eat animals. Just because it's physically possible to survive without it doesn't change the fact that we're suited to it.
Yes, it is optional, but the reason it's an option at all is evolution... and over-abundance of food.
If there was a famine and all your tofu was gone, you might suddenly find Rover much more appetizing.
what do i think of the quote?Hobohodo said:Hello, I don't normally post a topic myself, but I saw something today, and I was just wondering what you guy's would have to say about it. On Facebook I saw an argument happening over the idea that 'If you're not a vegetarian, it's impossible for you to love animals'.
I don't know about you guy's, but I found this idea completely idiotic, the way I see it, we are in the food chain as-well as the animals, it's natural for us to eat them. I personally believe that whilst there's no problem in being a vegetarian, I don't think people should really be judged just because they eat meat, especially by making the assumption that they therefore do not love animals. It's just normal nature, you can still love animals, even if you eat meat.
So, what do you guy's think?
I'm not saying you have to want to butcher your own food yourself. It's just the people who honestly have next to know idea how the food on their plates got there, and then when they find out act like they're witnessing the Holocaust in action. Of course, none of these sort of people will ever actually follow through on their righteous indignation and actually stop eating the product of the slaughter that sickens them so much. A stop at McDonald's on their way home will normally put it right out of their minds.spacecowboy86 said:Don't mean to be rude, but can you clarify a bit? Are you suggesting that everyone who eats meat has to have the balls to butcher it themselves? I enjoy my meat products, but I just don't have the stomach for seeing blood pour out of an animal. I highly respect anyone who can handle large amounts of blood and gore professionally, whether they be a butcher or a surgeon. Does this make me a bad person?NinjaDeathSlap said:The extreme to which they took that argument was idiotic. However, I would be lying if I said that it has never pissed me off how some people can gorge themselves silly on meat without a care in the world, but will recoil in disgust if they're ever told to do so much as pluck a chicken. I mean really, how hypocritical can you get? You want to be an omnivore? Be an omnivore. But don't then act like the farmer who has to cut Miss Piggy's throat in order to put yet another bacon roll in front of you is some kind of brute.
Seriously, props to the doctors and butchers out there.