"You can't love animal's if you're not a vegetarian"

Recommended Videos

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,604
0
0
I love animals. I grew up with many as pets and considered them to be family. Currently, the family has a dog who seems attached to me at the hip whenever I come home from college for a few days. I also love animals as food (not the same animals, different ones... like pigs, cows, chickens, etc).

Whoever made that statement clearly doesn't know what a vegetarian really is or doesn't know what love is. My guess is that he is a hate-filled moron trying to troll. Which is sad because there are so many better ways he could have done so and come off reasonably intelligent (not exceedingly, just reasonably). Regardless, animals are awesome. They can be delicious.

....


Wait... By chance, he/she didn't mean "love" as in "sexual attraction" did he? Because I could see where he/she is coming from there... but then they have a different problem entirely and you're off the hook for that one.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,860
0
41
Is it just me or is the answer very fucking obvious.

Its totally arbitrary but you can eat meat and love animals. Just not ALL animals. The statement "I love animals" describes you feeling affection for animals plural. Many animals. And i do. I love penguins and giraffes and jellyfish and octopuses and whales. I cant say i feel this same feeling of affection for cows and pigs and chickens. So while as a meat eater i cant say "I love ALL animals" i can definitely say "I like animals" in the same way you can say "I like cheese" and not love ALL cheeses in the entire world. You can say "I like spicey foods" and hate spice flavored animal feces. Just because there are a few exceptions doesn't make the statement false since the statement isnt totally blanket. It isnt "I love ALL animals". As a meat eater i totally concede i am unable to honestly say this phrase. Im ok with that.

I accept the animals I like and dont like are fairly arbitrary. There is no rule of intelligence. Its tangentially related to scarcity and normality but not totally. I just view cows chickens and pigs as animals we have domesticated and bred for eating. I dont view them as a wild animal anymore (the wild relatives obviously being exceptions). They are farmed. Morally i feel like im close to being vegetarian. Im thinking about it. Although i cant say i feel BAD eating meat i can definitely see why being vegetarian is a morally sound stance compared to eating meat. I dont have the will to be a vegetarian. I dont feel it. I can reason it morally but in practice i dont really feel what i see on paper that i should. Maybe that makes me a bad person. Im not sure. Im still thinking about it.
 

pilouuuu

New member
Aug 18, 2009
701
0
0
the December King said:
I think what annoys me the most about this is that usually quotes like " I love my cat and I love steaks" or "I love animals... in my belly" and such all make people who do eat meat sound like psychos. Sure, you can love your pets and enjoy eating meat, I just think there are better ways of saying it.
I think that eating meat makes you have a better sense of humour ;-) When people are all the time telling you that you shouldn't eat meat just because... That makes me think of those people as psychos.
 

DrOswald

New member
Apr 22, 2011
1,443
0
0
I don't need logic or arguments to respond to this one. I have known many people who love animals and eat meat. This person is empirically wrong. The data at our disposal disproves the statement before we even begin.
 

Warachia

New member
Aug 11, 2009
1,116
0
0
CarlMinez said:
Warachia said:
CarlMinez said:
Okay, so this can really be narrowed down to a semantical issue.

Does "love animals" include all animals or just a selected number of species? If the answer is all animals: no, you can't claim to love while at the same time kill and eat what you love if you have the choice not to. The very notion is preposterous. I can't claim to love puppies while eating puppies. I can't claim to have love children while eating children. You don't have to think long before realizing that one can't possible claim to have a platonic affection for a living being that you also wouldn't mind chewing and digesting.

But if you by animals mean "dogs, cats and horses" then you can probably say it without being too hypocritical.
Yes, you can love the things you eat, sometimes you can make it a little complicated, for example, one person I knew had cows that he had to have someone else kill because he couldn't. There are plenty of people who raise and love pigs, and then eat ham, some friends I know had cows and chickens that they'd raise and then sell their meat, I can't see why you say that it has to be one or the other.
I really don't know about that. I don't doubt that a farmer can have a certain affection for an animal, but if that affection isn't strong enough to keep the farmer from killing and eating the animal in question, that affection can hardly be called love.

Let's instead apply our reasoning to another example to see how ridiculous it can get. The love that people have for dogs is not mere affection, it's a good example of platonic love. If you met a person who claims to love dogs, and learn that the person in question has a habit of killing and eating his canine pets, would you take this person seriously?

I wouldn't. I would wonder which strange definition of love this sick man has and then try to find a way to forbid him from owning dogs.

Now dogs is a category of animals that humans really do love in the true definition of the term. Pigs, cows, chickens - these typed of animals are seldom loved and that's why we can treat them like we do. They are not kept as pets or animal companions, they are in the end just property.

I can promise you that if we kept pigs as pets, we would be equally upset with the idea of eating pigs. It' just proves that there is no logics behind the way we feel about eating animals. It's cultural tradition and habit, nothing else.
You seem to be under the impression that all farmers/ranchers should let animals they love die naturally, which is rediculous, you raise them, you milk them, then when they get old enough but not too old you take them to a butcher you trust, it's not as if you raise them only to kill them.

This question is more ridiculous than the situation, a "habit" of killing and eating pets? Do they do this randomly, or can't they control it when it happens? Or is it once a month that they eat a pet? If they raise a pet only to eat it, then I wouldn't take them seriously no.

You also seem to be under the impression that people don't keep farmyard animals as pets, a surprising amount of people do keep pigs as pets, but I don't recall them having any problem with eating ham.

I fail to see how eating something diminishes a persons love for it, personally I think killing the thing you love would do more for taking away your love for something than eating it, and that's not even looking into specifics, like a single animal, since animals are individuals and vary quite a lot from one another, the reason pig owners don't feel bad about ham is because it isn't their pig they're eating.

Getting back to your earlier question, in some countries they do eat dogs, if a person had a dog for a pet that they loved, and they ate dog meat, I would not think of that as strange, or think they didn't love their dog.
 

TehMoustache

New member
Sep 17, 2012
6
0
0
Dags90 said:
I just can't finish a whole one by myself.

What's funny is that I don't love people as a rule, but I'm decidedly not a cannibal.
Amen! I love my cat, doesn't mean I will eat her! Though, if the zombie apocalypse happens, all bets are off!
 

Tsaba

reconnoiter
Oct 6, 2009
1,435
0
0
who doesn't love animals I ask you.... who?



Seriously though, I love dogs, when I went through a hard time with my parents divorce my dog was there for me, you sure as hell can't share that with a chicken or cow,... or other people (for that matter), seriously who can understand people other than that fur ball of unconditional love I ask you.... So, in closing, who ever stated that can kindly go take a long walk some where else.
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
tell that to a farmer who is passionate about his livestock. Nice way to get either a grown men crying or a solid punch in the d.

I think plants are pretty neat, I eat them though.

I'm sure the cavemen loved animals they kept around, but because they lacked another source of protine they would do poorly if they didn't eat them. Does this make them evil?

Do you spare the mosquito in your room, even if it does no real harm to you (outside of malaria country)?

You could make the argument that you probably shouldn't eat animals if you love them. But to say that you "CAN'T" is just retarded
 

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
The first movie I watched in cinemas was "The Lion King".Killing animals for food is just part of the circle of Life!
BUT, everything in moderation. Remember when Scar ate all the animals with his creepy friends? It turns the planet into a desert!

Eating meat isn't inherently "bad", but it makes me sick how some people tend to celebrate meat like it's the greatest thing. A healthy diet should contain meat, but it should also not be entirely based on it. And don't forget that this overconsumption of meat pushes the abuse and industrialization of the meat economy. We, as modern people in a modern society, could benefit from eating less meat.
 

spacecowboy86

New member
Jan 7, 2010
315
0
0
NinjaDeathSlap said:
The extreme to which they took that argument was idiotic. However, I would be lying if I said that it has never pissed me off how some people can gorge themselves silly on meat without a care in the world, but will recoil in disgust if they're ever told to do so much as pluck a chicken. I mean really, how hypocritical can you get? You want to be an omnivore? Be an omnivore. But don't then act like the farmer who has to cut Miss Piggy's throat in order to put yet another bacon roll in front of you is some kind of brute.
Don't mean to be rude, but can you clarify a bit? Are you suggesting that everyone who eats meat has to have the balls to butcher it themselves? I enjoy my meat products, but I just don't have the stomach for seeing blood pour out of an animal. I highly respect anyone who can handle large amounts of blood and gore professionally, whether they be a butcher or a surgeon. Does this make me a bad person?
Seriously, props to the doctors and butchers out there.
 

rutger5000

New member
Oct 19, 2010
1,052
0
0
Well that depends really are we talking about loving animals in general or loving a specific animal. If it's the former then the statement makes sense, you've got some screwed up ideas about love if you eat those you love. If it's the later then the statement is rubish. There are plenty of humans and animals I love, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't be able to personally kill a human or an animal, let alone just simpely being responsible of it.
 

rutger5000

New member
Oct 19, 2010
1,052
0
0
BeeGeenie said:
Ginger768 said:
Tanis said:
That 'argument' is bad, and whoever makes it should feel bad.

We're animals, that eat meat.

It's part of our evolution, DEAL WIT IT!
;)
Part of our Evolution? is that a joke?...Tell me if it is i'm terrible on picking up on this stuff


You can survive without meat there's no necessity for it. The human race wouldn't end if we all became allergic to the stuff. We're omnivores, and since we live in a society that allows you to choose what you want to eat and both meat and other types of food are always available whether you eat meat or not is optional.
That's kind of beside the point.
We have canines, we can digest meat. We are evolved to be able to eat animals. Just because it's physically possible to survive without it doesn't change the fact that we're suited to it.
Yes, it is optional, but the reason it's an option at all is evolution... and over-abundance of food.
If there was a famine and all your tofu was gone, you might suddenly find Rover much more appetizing.
As a vegetarian the evolution argument has always pissed me of. It's only been a few decades that daily meat intake became available to most members of western society. Before that people ate meat, but not nearly enough as they do now. It was just too hard to get meat. Eating meat was like a bonus, something that didn't happen really often, and our body was not addapted to it being normal to have meat in your daily diet. Also many people who use the evolution theorem understand jake shit about it. And even if the evolution argument wouldn't have been complete bullshit, it's not like we can't get passed our evolution. Humans weren't evolved to use smartphones either.
It's fine you don't want to be a vegetarian. It's fine not caring about the environment, public health, it's fine you don't care about animal rights. But don't be such a freaking pussy, and just flat out say so that you don't want to go through the effort to make a change in your diet.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
Hobohodo said:
Hello, I don't normally post a topic myself, but I saw something today, and I was just wondering what you guy's would have to say about it. On Facebook I saw an argument happening over the idea that 'If you're not a vegetarian, it's impossible for you to love animals'.

I don't know about you guy's, but I found this idea completely idiotic, the way I see it, we are in the food chain as-well as the animals, it's natural for us to eat them. I personally believe that whilst there's no problem in being a vegetarian, I don't think people should really be judged just because they eat meat, especially by making the assumption that they therefore do not love animals. It's just normal nature, you can still love animals, even if you eat meat.

So, what do you guy's think?
what do i think of the quote?

it makes me want to punch vegetarians in the mouth and eat a panda right out of spite for them being such pretentious stuck up *****!!!!!!
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
spacecowboy86 said:
NinjaDeathSlap said:
The extreme to which they took that argument was idiotic. However, I would be lying if I said that it has never pissed me off how some people can gorge themselves silly on meat without a care in the world, but will recoil in disgust if they're ever told to do so much as pluck a chicken. I mean really, how hypocritical can you get? You want to be an omnivore? Be an omnivore. But don't then act like the farmer who has to cut Miss Piggy's throat in order to put yet another bacon roll in front of you is some kind of brute.
Don't mean to be rude, but can you clarify a bit? Are you suggesting that everyone who eats meat has to have the balls to butcher it themselves? I enjoy my meat products, but I just don't have the stomach for seeing blood pour out of an animal. I highly respect anyone who can handle large amounts of blood and gore professionally, whether they be a butcher or a surgeon. Does this make me a bad person?
Seriously, props to the doctors and butchers out there.
I'm not saying you have to want to butcher your own food yourself. It's just the people who honestly have next to know idea how the food on their plates got there, and then when they find out act like they're witnessing the Holocaust in action. Of course, none of these sort of people will ever actually follow through on their righteous indignation and actually stop eating the product of the slaughter that sickens them so much. A stop at McDonald's on their way home will normally put it right out of their minds.