The horror...Bobbity said:Take that, whichever bastard tries to quote me.
Captcha; ebasen tomatoes
The horror...Bobbity said:Take that, whichever bastard tries to quote me.
Jim Gaffigan quote FTW!FirearmsKill said:I'd go back to when I was eating bacon.
Invent time travel = create alternate universe?Rellik San said:Ah but then that requires a belief that time is constant and things are preordained. How do we know you just wouldn't create fractal universes when you alter something, or that maybe you're meant to go alter a specific event? But then that requires a belief in predestination, in which case, what's the point of time travel? Time is not a linear concept on a universal scale.Arqus_Zed said:If the first, I would probably tell nobody and destroy the damn thing, because paradoxes would definitely ensue, causing fractures in the time-space-continuum that could destroy existence. Just not worth it.![]()
Back to the Future part 2.Arqus_Zed said:Invent time travel = create alternate universe?
I've heard that one before, but I'm not sure how I feel about that theory...
Would be awesome though
I don't believe in preordained things, fate or destiny, that kind of stuff. I see life as a game, there are certain rules that can't be broken, but anything can happen and stories are written as they go.
And yes, I've heard the whole "time is not like the flow of a river, more like the expanding ripples in the water after throwing a rock in a lake" story before.
I just don't believe it's possible to invent time travel and then go to a period when time travel didn't exist yet. One could also presume that's the reason why we haven't seen time travelers yet.
Oh, I actually got it from a Thorgal comic bookRellik San said:Back to the Future part 2.Arqus_Zed said:Invent time travel = create alternate universe?
I've heard that one before, but I'm not sure how I feel about that theory...
Would be awesome though
I don't believe in preordained things, fate or destiny, that kind of stuff. I see life as a game, there are certain rules that can't be broken, but anything can happen and stories are written as they go.
And yes, I've heard the whole "time is not like the flow of a river, more like the expanding ripples in the water after throwing a rock in a lake" story before.
I just don't believe it's possible to invent time travel and then go to a period when time travel didn't exist yet. One could also presume that's the reason why we haven't seen time travelers yet.
Why does existence need rules, sure on a moral value and such, but why should our existence be bound by anything but our understanding of the universe, if we learn to manipulate time, who's to say where and when we can't travel.
There was a time travel experiment a fairly famous one, I'll look for the information on it and post it when I found it, but scientists sent a particle back in time by one second... but in that second before it arrived, it hadn't yet been sent back, so for that one second time travel wasn't invented, when it had arrived.
Well it's a fairly popular theory I suppose.Arqus_Zed said:Oh, I actually got it from a Thorgal comic book
That said, I can see you have a typical scientific understanding of time travel: try to go as far and deep as possible, with nothing but good intentions. That's a wonderful thing, but it's kind of like dynamite and nuclear fusion/fission: imagine how such power could be perverted.
I know particles that travel back in time are known as tachyons. But I thought those were only used in hypothetical situations, you know, thought experiments and stuff...