You have been forced to nuke a country.

[Sojoez]

First I would give out a warning and a 2 month notice to the population.

Then I would drop the bomb on Israel. Make it a dirty bomb, I want the so called 'holy land' to be uninhabitable for the next fifty or hundred thousand years.

No more religious squabble and by the time the radiation has gone, nobody will even remember what was so holy about it. The end of religion.

 

[theevilgenius60]

I'd nuke either North Korea or Iran, God knows they have just been begging for it. Both countries are like "Making nukes? Us? Never!" but you just know that is their(and by they, I mean the leadership) biggest wet dream. So yeah, save the world and take out a potential threat? Easy choice.

 

[Moonlight Butterfly]

Tuvalu a set of small islands in the Pacific it's beautiful but it has the smallest population and is going to be underwater in 50 years anyway. It's also kind of in the middle of nowhere. Nothing is going to be a good option but I think that would be at least a restriction of deaths and fallout.

 

[SniperMacFox]

You are being forced to nuke a country. If you do not comply, the entire world will be destroyed. What country do you destroy?

Sealand. It's a small country in the british isles that's an abandoned oil rig. I'm serious. I'm sure the people there will have enough time to evacuate and we could always do with a few more mutated fish in the channel (or less mutated fish, given the levels of pollution there).

 

[Doomsday11]

I live in Iran, so I came into this thread expecting to see many people choosing this country as their target. Surprisingly, there weren't that many!
(for the record I'm not Iranian, my parents are. I grew up in Italy and we moved here when I was a teenager.)

I'm sorry middle east countries your on my targeting list because its too much work taking care of you and I'd rather just blow you guys up. If I could only pick one it'd be Iran those guys are looking at us the funniest.

At the risk of drawing flak from everyone and their mothers, who asked anyone to "take care" of these countries? Truth is, they're rich in oil and have high strategic value, so that's why USA is here. Saddam and Bin Laden were puppets anyway.

But I do agree that Iran is looking funny at the west. Hell I live here I'd know. The level of paranoia is high, they think the west has it in for them. The sanctions are heavy too to be honest. But if you think Iran would do any kind of military action that is not self-defence... you're wrong.

Iran there basically evil and I would be saving the world a whole load of hassle for when they next decide to have a go at either Israeli or the west in general.

Okay, you're stupid. Moving on.

China, Iran or USA...


You wouldn't even need to force me!

Interesting lineup of countries.

Iraq because I'm deployed here right now and this place is the biggest waste of earth I've ever thought imaginable. Seriously, when we (U.S. forces) leave, this country will get overrun by Iran anyway.

Why would Iran overrun Iraq? As if there would be anything of value left in there after the US leaves it lol. If you seriously think a country like Iran would "overrun" anywhere you have no understanding of how things work. Which is understandable, considering you were deployed to Iraq and all..

By "Nuke", you mean "toss every atomic weapon in America's arsenal" at them?
Hm... the Brits are getting too smug... but most of my favorite YouTubers are British...
FUCK YOU IRAN! And every country AROUND Iran. Terrorist problem solved!

Let's see. You'd nuke Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan because you hate Iran. What a champ. Though the "every country around Iran" mentality is something The US has been doing for a while, only instead of nuking they've been invading/planting military troops in them one by one slowly.

As for myself. Difficult choice. The first reaction would be Iran because I am stuck here and I hate the fact that I'm stuck here and it's driving me insane. And I hate the people and wouldn't mind seeing them go. But then when I'd realize I would not be able to kill that many innocent people because of my petty grudge so I'd do a thorough research in order to find out the location that would result in minimal casualties/damage.

I'm sorry but what makes you think the selection of iran is in any way stupid,you tool? While the middle-east in general may be oil rich it lacks in many other aspects mainly well organized,non-fundamental religious government add the fact that iran has on multiple times denied not only Israels right too exist but the Holocaust as well(Not to mention it's actions in harboring terrorists) and while there may be many innocent people there (just like north korea or china or any other country in the world)It's better in the long run too protect what is in my view the only stable,non-corrupt pro-western govenment in the middle as well as take out a country that is continually looking for ways in which to gain the ability to create nuclear material for military use(Also if country had said material do you really think it would not be tempted to at least wave this in the face of the west in some way thus making things harder on it's native population?
Really you need to look at things from a more detached perspective because if it ever comes down to a situation like this you need to be very clinical in chooseing what to do.

 

[Sean Hollyman]

Technically it's not a country but it sure as well thinks of itself as one so Wales. I went to uni there and loved it but apart from that small seaside town, Wales is a dank, dirty shithole. Every inch of it. I've got a lot of friends there so I'll get them all to safety in England or the sea first and then happily nuke Wales.

You do realise that the fallout from the nuke will basically murder everyone in England, Scotland and Ireland as well, right?

And we are a country.

Technically, you're not.

K


Goodbye

Absolutely amazing how much enlightenment you can fit into a letter and a word, isn't it?

Really, have you NOTHING to contribute? Yet you felt the need to post that? Right...

I know right?

 

[Fenix7]

I'm sorry but what makes you think the selection of iran is in any way stupid,you tool?

Good question. Your original posts reeks of stupidity. Look for yourself:

Iran there basically evil and I would be saving the world a whole load of hassle for when they next decide to have a go at either Israeli or the west in general.

"there basically evil" ...inability to spell aside, what are you? 12? Calling me a tool doesn't help your [poor] case either.

While the middle-east in general may be oil rich it lacks in many other aspects mainly well organized,non-fundamental religious government add the fact that iran has on multiple times denied not only Israels right too exist but the Holocaust as well(Not to mention it's actions in harboring terrorists) and while there may be many innocent people there (just like north korea or china or any other country in the world)It's better in the long run too protect what is in my view the only stable,non-corrupt pro-western govenment in the middle as well as take out a country that is continually looking for ways in which to gain the ability to create nuclear material for military use(Also if country had said material do you really think it would not be tempted to at least wave this in the face of the west in some way thus making things harder on it's native population?
Really you need to look at things from a more detached perspective because if it ever comes down to a situation like this you need to be very clinical in chooseing what to do.

Haha do you really believe this stuff or are you trolling. Because if you are, you're doing a very good impression of the brainwashed gullible idiot.

..if you aren't, let me just say that I feel sorry for you and have nothing else to talk to you about.

 

[Doomsday11]

I'm sorry but what makes you think the selection of iran is in any way stupid,you tool?

Good question. Your original posts reeks of stupidity. Look for yourself:

Iran there basically evil and I would be saving the world a whole load of hassle for when they next decide to have a go at either Israeli or the west in general.

"there basically evil" ...inability to spell aside, what are you? 12? Calling me a tool doesn't help your [poor] case either.

While the middle-east in general may be oil rich it lacks in many other aspects mainly well organized,non-fundamental religious government add the fact that iran has on multiple times denied not only Israels right too exist but the Holocaust as well(Not to mention it's actions in harboring terrorists) and while there may be many innocent people there (just like north korea or china or any other country in the world)It's better in the long run too protect what is in my view the only stable,non-corrupt pro-western govenment in the middle as well as take out a country that is continually looking for ways in which to gain the ability to create nuclear material for military use(Also if country had said material do you really think it would not be tempted to at least wave this in the face of the west in some way thus making things harder on it's native population?
Really you need to look at things from a more detached perspective because if it ever comes down to a situation like this you need to be very clinical in chooseing what to do.

Haha do you really believe this stuff or are you trolling. Because if you are, you're doing a very good impression of the brainwashed gullible idiot.

..if you aren't, let me just say that I feel sorry for you and have nothing else to talk to you about.

First you are a tool if you really believe that Iran and the Iranian government is in anyway a force for good if you are then I would have to say you are an idiot.
I'll admit that it was wrong to say that it was basically evil I was doing it for briefness but that was a folly of course the situation is more complicated than that so ok my bad there especially if you are a resident of that country then fair enough too you.
The fact's are that Israel is the only stably legitimate government within the middle-east not mired with corruption and/or run by religious fundamentalists(This is what I define as bad in my belief not due to the religion itself being Islam but I believe that religion and the state should be separate entities)the fact that said nation is also pro-western and does not belief that the other nations people around them do not have the right to exist and deny the worst tragedy in (relatively)recent history.
I was sort of trolling if only to say that I was tired of the fact that everyone tiptoes around the issue of Iran and the middle-east in general in public,Iran is run by a nutter just like north-Korea and at least half a dozen African states who if he had the power would obliterate Israel in a second,the same nation that kidnaps foreign civilians and uses them to leverage some form of favors from western governments(See the recent hitchhiking incident and the British couple held hostage after there boat was stormed by Iranian forces).Though other western and far eastern governments are by no means wonderful entities them selves but there better(in my opinion then Iran.)
In conclusion yes I was slightly trolling but there are a lot deeper issues at play here not least of which is the state of Iran politically at the moment and the fact that the middle east needs to find it's place on the world stage outside of the stereotype of just being the places where religious extremists are grown and the place for western nations to go to fill up on oil.However I did speak out of turn and I'm sure there are many good natured wonderful people there unfortunately being kept out of the limelight by the batshit insanity that is Ahmadinejad.
The spelling is due to a minor dyslexia on my end.