I was thinking about Simm, as he is the newest one (and not dead yet I think).arc101 said:Simm or Delgardo?Sindre1 said:The Master from DW ^^
But due to timetravel it may be Delgardo aswell. Or any of the others.
I was thinking about Simm, as he is the newest one (and not dead yet I think).arc101 said:Simm or Delgardo?Sindre1 said:The Master from DW ^^
Damn right, i do this all the time. I'ts not because i'm a good guy but because i don't consider the mostache-twirling crap the bad guys do as "evil"Seriin said:When I was younger, I would have agree'd with you in a second, but as I've grown up I find evil isn't as much fun anymore. This is the main reason I didn't like GTA4. A good game on its own right, but I have outgrown the chaos-simulator style.
More on topic however, in games that I play and am given a choice between light and dark I find myself siding on the "light" side as opposed to the dark. I do this without a goal of the light side in mind, it is simply that the light side is, well, nicer. The KotOR series, Mass Effect, Bioshock, etc. The sliding bar of good and evil is shifted toward good when I play these unless I go out of my way to be bad to see an alternative outcome. If a beloved series of mine, say pokemon for example, were to offer a good vs. evil choice I would choose dark to see what was new, but would probably ultimately succumb to returning to the light. I enjoy having a choice in the matter however.
That being said, I do enjoy playing as the supposed "bad guys" when the choice is merely choosing a team and isn't based on story based choices. In Star Wars: Empire at War, for example, my preferred team of choice is the Empire. I find them to be better and given that I dislike land battles in that game and enjoy space battles the option to simply blow up every planet after conquering its overhead streamlines the match.
One of the main reasons I am swayed more toward the light is because I dislike corruption, as cliched as that may sound. I tend to distance myself and distrust anything that becomes too large and too influential. It is part of the reason I have a vocal anti-religion opinion.
HOWEVER, I am looking into this far too much, sorry if I derailed this at all.
I prefer chaos... mainly cos' I'm a tiny bit evilHutchy_Bear said:For the EMPORER!
![]()
What the hell did you just say? I can't understand anything before "eldar". And even that should be "Eldar".Gebi10000 said:TO SIENCE!!!!!!!!!. or toth unitaid states of japan(gode geass).or to th eldar craftworld of biel-tan
I see your artillery, and raise you one that walks on legs and has 3 barrels.Armored Prayer said:True. While GDI had the better tech, NOD had the funner tech.firedfns13 said:It's funny because I would join GDI since they have the most kick ass technology.Armored Prayer said:I'd also would love to join the Brotherhood of NOD.
Who can say no to mechs with flamethrowers, artillery that can cloak, and vaper bombs?
You mean... These? [http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/hoodies/b7e2/]Amnestic said:Organisation XIII from Kingdom Hearts because of their snazzy coats and funky eyes.
I see your force and I'll raise you missiles, flamethrowers, SAM turrets, confessor cabals, stealth tanks, flame tanks, vertigo bombers, avatars, and the Redeemer (sp?). OK thats all I got.firedfns13 said:I see your artillery, and raise you one that walks on legs and has 3 barrels.Armored Prayer said:True. While GDI had the better tech, NOD had the funner tech.
Who can say no to mechs with flamethrowers, artillery that can cloak, and vaper bombs?
I'll also raise you railguns, sonic grenades, disrupter tanks, mammoth mechs, and the commando. Assuming no cyborg commandos allowed.
i guess it depends on whicj were playing. the original i would totally be NODArmored Prayer said:I see your force and I'll raise you missiles, flamethrowers, SAM turrets, confessor cabals, stealth tanks, flame tanks, vertigo bombers, avatars, and the Redeemer (sp?). OK thats all I got.firedfns13 said:I see your artillery, and raise you one that walks on legs and has 3 barrels.Armored Prayer said:True. While GDI had the better tech, NOD had the funner tech.
Who can say no to mechs with flamethrowers, artillery that can cloak, and vaper bombs?
I'll also raise you railguns, sonic grenades, disrupter tanks, mammoth mechs, and the commando. Assuming no cyborg commandos allowed.
Truth be told, the Earth Federation actually is a political body, but in times of war (i.e. the OYW and the Gryps Conflict), the Earth Federal Forces assumes control. But then again, Zeon wasn't much better, what with Space Hitler killing Degwin and assuming control and all that. So I must put my vote in for Char's Neo-Zeon.AXLE_BULLITT_19 said:I'd would have to conside joining the Zions from Gundam because the higher ups for the Earth Federation all sound like a bunch of politicians.
I guess your right. I've only played C&C 3 and KW on my 360. Lets just call it even.firedfns13 said:i guess it depends on whicj were playing. the original i would totally be NODArmored Prayer said:I see your force and I'll raise you missiles, flamethrowers, SAM turrets, confessor cabals, stealth tanks, flame tanks, vertigo bombers, avatars, and the Redeemer (sp?). OK thats all I got.firedfns13 said:I see your artillery, and raise you one that walks on legs and has 3 barrels.
I'll also raise you railguns, sonic grenades, disrupter tanks, mammoth mechs, and the commando. Assuming no cyborg commandos allowed.
Hell yeah. They get awesome armor.Flames66 said:StarWars, Mandalorians. Not good or bad as a whole but different characters have gone both ways. Nice alternative to the Jedi anyway.