You Win Because You Are An Idiot. Goodbye.
- Thread starter MarcusStrout
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I think one of my all time favourites was on a forum debating chavs...
To which one of them posted (yes I'm amazed they understand the alphabet and typing, too).
'u can all suck my cock u fagz'.
It's just amazing that's he asking a multitude of gay men to fellate him while being angry at them for being gay.
It's up their with the guys Bill Hicks had to face after a show...
'Hey, Mister funny man...come here!'
*shoves bill in the chest, pushing him away*
To which one of them posted (yes I'm amazed they understand the alphabet and typing, too).
'u can all suck my cock u fagz'.
It's just amazing that's he asking a multitude of gay men to fellate him while being angry at them for being gay.
It's up their with the guys Bill Hicks had to face after a show...
'Hey, Mister funny man...come here!'
*shoves bill in the chest, pushing him away*
Class discussion: A case about felony-murder.
Idiot: They were all got sentenced to death because they were 18. If they were 17 it wouldn't have made much difference. "It's a poorly thought out loophole."
Me: Although I agree that a year won't make much of a difference, the law has to define some absolute extent. The law is being taken seriously. It's also not a loophole, and it wasn't intended to be one either.
Idiot: What kind of drugs you on? He wouldn't be a reformed man at 18, so it's a loophole in the law. And how would you know about the law being taken seriously? knowing your demographic, you have obviously had no experience with crooked cops.
*the scary part is, everyone in the class somehow agreed with him
Me: At this point I'm not going to even bother explaining it to you. I would like to see how long it would take you to figure it out, but I have little patience. My participation in this discussion is over, please continue without me.
Idiot: They were all got sentenced to death because they were 18. If they were 17 it wouldn't have made much difference. "It's a poorly thought out loophole."
Me: Although I agree that a year won't make much of a difference, the law has to define some absolute extent. The law is being taken seriously. It's also not a loophole, and it wasn't intended to be one either.
Idiot: What kind of drugs you on? He wouldn't be a reformed man at 18, so it's a loophole in the law. And how would you know about the law being taken seriously? knowing your demographic, you have obviously had no experience with crooked cops.
*the scary part is, everyone in the class somehow agreed with him
Me: At this point I'm not going to even bother explaining it to you. I would like to see how long it would take you to figure it out, but I have little patience. My participation in this discussion is over, please continue without me.
In my Radio Broadcasting class, there was one girl who just wouldn't stop asking about how Radio signals made it from the station to the radio. The teacher drew diagrams, explained it to her like she was a 3 year old. Eventually, I got fed up with her asking and screamed "IT'S MAGIC!!" And she said (I shit you not, humanity is doomed) "Well, that makes more sense then what he was saying", and continued to text her friend...
I hate people.
I hate people.
I remember being in a class organized debate a couple of years ago, and we had a nice little argument about editorial vs advertorial.
It came to the end and it was time to make rebuttal, and the opposing debater gets up and hashes her way through, not really taking into account any of the flawed arguments we made. When I get up though, I glance toward her desk and I notice on her notes the word 'Rebuttle'.
"You don't get to make a rebuttal if you can't spell it right"
We won the debate, but It really felt as if I were debating with a five-year old. It just made me feel dirty, and that has to be a victory in the final analysis, to the opposing team.
It came to the end and it was time to make rebuttal, and the opposing debater gets up and hashes her way through, not really taking into account any of the flawed arguments we made. When I get up though, I glance toward her desk and I notice on her notes the word 'Rebuttle'.
"You don't get to make a rebuttal if you can't spell it right"
We won the debate, but It really felt as if I were debating with a five-year old. It just made me feel dirty, and that has to be a victory in the final analysis, to the opposing team.
I can personally guarantee that 1/2 of the top 10% of my class would say shit like this. The best was when our valedictorian, in her graduation speech no less, described the halls of our schools as "stampedy" as in, what, full of stampedes? When asked later about it, she replied "It makes sense if you think about it, but, if not for Merriam-Webster, how would we know what words exist?"
Upon showing her it was not a word in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, she replied "Oh, you must not have the right version."
Holy. Shit.
Upon showing her it was not a word in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, she replied "Oh, you must not have the right version."
Holy. Shit.
Grampy_bone post=18.72612.767003 said:
Oh man, I'm in education and saying "Who's the teacher here" is like shooting yourself in the foot.
Yes, the prohibition was caused by women. Here's the canadian example http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0006515
With b), that happens to me all the time. People just don't let you have a victory. But with c), surely you could just use your facemouth to bite their hand off?Omnidum post=18.72612.769141 said:
Countless times on MMOs and other online things. My absolute favourite is NO U. Even though it's a terrible cop-out response, it still makes me laugh.