Booster stuns the mudkips and throws a greatball.
Mudkip escapes and noms Booster's face.
Mudkip wins cuteality
Mudkip escapes and noms Booster's face.
Mudkip wins cuteality
Your Avatar vs Above Avatar?
- Thread starter mrhappyface
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I thought that the first few pages of posts were weird, what with the changed avatars not matching with the posts, but even these later ones are bizarre. For some reason I feel sorry for the pixel vortex. Clearly it would own all of us.
Now I have no idea what the above avatar is, something called Booster apparently, but my witch can fly, use witchcraft, summon bats...and eat pumpkin. You're doomed, particularly with that last fact.
Now I have no idea what the above avatar is, something called Booster apparently, but my witch can fly, use witchcraft, summon bats...and eat pumpkin. You're doomed, particularly with that last fact.
I would land on the both of you. And then rescue some short people from a witch, find a lion, a scarecrow, and a robot.
)
I've been waiting for this forum to update and only now have I realised it went onto another page (I should put this one on follow).
Anyway I'm not too sure what you two people are but you said cast Odin and Cyclops so I assume you are two summoners of Final Fantasy. I never knew there was a summon called Cyclops?
I believe both summons lack distant attacks so she will just keep her distance, cast Thundarga on Odin and as for Cyclops (checking the wiki) oh he does have a distance attack. Slight change of tactics for my avatar, have her cast Blind (I don't believe there is a Blindarga) on Cyclops and lure him to shoot at the summoners, while casting Thundarga on Odin. While he's blind it would also be easier to have my witch just kill the summoners, cancelling out both summons. Why didn't I have her do that in the first place?
Anyway I'm not too sure what you two people are but you said cast Odin and Cyclops so I assume you are two summoners of Final Fantasy. I never knew there was a summon called Cyclops?
I believe both summons lack distant attacks so she will just keep her distance, cast Thundarga on Odin and as for Cyclops (checking the wiki) oh he does have a distance attack. Slight change of tactics for my avatar, have her cast Blind (I don't believe there is a Blindarga) on Cyclops and lure him to shoot at the summoners, while casting Thundarga on Odin. While he's blind it would also be easier to have my witch just kill the summoners, cancelling out both summons. Why didn't I have her do that in the first place?
...Odin and cyclops are summon spells..you need to re do your tactic because you'll be blinding air check the final fantasy wiki for summoners from tactics...(PS1) because in tactic summon spells hit a small chunk of the battle dealing major damage not actually on the field so you couldn't hit them
(sorry if this is repetitive)
(sorry if this is repetitive)
And I haven't played Final Fantasy Tactics so this poses quite a problem. Thanks to quick research it says you have high mp but little else and also suffer from long casting time.
It's crude but quickly ramming into the opponent and casting quicker spells would probably work out. Admittedly you can use Earthen Wall and Ruby Light to cut damage and reflect spells but in theory a physical attack, or in this case a full blow flying ram, should knock the air out of the target, and using a spell of an explosive property at close range should effect the summoners regardless of reflection.
I wonder if Silence affects a Summoner's ability to cast summons as that would help a great deal. Also the bats can be used as per a distant attack and yet do not qualify as magic (neither does the pumpkin) and would be able to deal damage without being reflected. Finally due to your low health it should be sufficient if any one of these attacks manage to hit their target.
I think the most crucial problem (other than how this is technically a mage and her bats vs. two summoners) would be that according to the wiki the summoner are good at ignoring a targets magic evasion. I'm just bargaining that my witch can deal sufficient damage to your summoners before their spells can be cast. Well hopefully the tactics I came up with are enough to thwart your tactics.
It's crude but quickly ramming into the opponent and casting quicker spells would probably work out. Admittedly you can use Earthen Wall and Ruby Light to cut damage and reflect spells but in theory a physical attack, or in this case a full blow flying ram, should knock the air out of the target, and using a spell of an explosive property at close range should effect the summoners regardless of reflection.
I wonder if Silence affects a Summoner's ability to cast summons as that would help a great deal. Also the bats can be used as per a distant attack and yet do not qualify as magic (neither does the pumpkin) and would be able to deal damage without being reflected. Finally due to your low health it should be sufficient if any one of these attacks manage to hit their target.
I think the most crucial problem (other than how this is technically a mage and her bats vs. two summoners) would be that according to the wiki the summoner are good at ignoring a targets magic evasion. I'm just bargaining that my witch can deal sufficient damage to your summoners before their spells can be cast. Well hopefully the tactics I came up with are enough to thwart your tactics.
we dont have earthen wall or ruby light
..we have something similar though
golem takes all the normal phyiscal damage i think it can take 1000 damage and carbunkel adds refelct
..and yes silence works on us but we also have a silence summon
..but i think this would be a fair fight...
(sorry if i read your post wrong and correct me if i did)
..we have something similar though
golem takes all the normal phyiscal damage i think it can take 1000 damage and carbunkel adds refelct
..and yes silence works on us but we also have a silence summon
..but i think this would be a fair fight...
(sorry if i read your post wrong and correct me if i did)