Your biggest "Fuck you" to the audience

Recommended Videos

Greater Evil

New member
Apr 18, 2009
40
0
0
http://illdothetalkingpodcast.libsyn.com/

One of the hosts starts telling the audience he hates their guts by about the 7th episode
It took so little time
 

ThePurpleStuff

New member
Apr 30, 2010
424
0
0
Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon not making proper DVD box sets of their old school cartoons, forcing me to get them through means I don't like or buy them off other people instead of just selling them online directly from their sites. It's like, "fuck you, no childhood nostalgia for you!" So I say right back, "then fuck you too, you don't deserve my money, you clearly don't want it in the first place."

When my first ever 360 red ringed right as soon as its warranty ran out. I swear to god it was a deliberate design choice just to milk more money out of people.
 

Colour Scientist

Troll the Respawn, Jeremy!
Jul 15, 2009
4,722
0
0
Parasitic_Chick said:
The ENTIRE 7th season of Doctor Who. Never have I been so appalled by a tv show then when I watched that pathetic excuse of a season. I still think Russel T. Davies and Matt Smith should go and die a slow horrible death.
Someone's already pointed out that Steven Moffat, not Davies, but yeah, it was pretty bad.

How many times can the say "Doctor Who" in an episode, or bring up bow ties, fish custard and don't get me started on River Song.
Their attempts to be cutesy and funny just felt so forced by the end of Matt Smith's run.

It definitely had it's moments but I was so sick of being reminded that bow ties are fun and cool every two seconds, just in case I had forgotten that Steven Moffat is hilarious.

Season five was one of my favourites and six had some great episodes but I gave up watching season seven when it was airing. I watched all of the reboot recently and finally got around to watching the last handful of episodes and they were an effort to watch.

Hopefully season eight will be less wibbly-wobbly.
 

Pseudonym2

New member
Mar 31, 2008
1,086
0
0
The ending for comic Wanted

The comic insults the reader for being a loser and not a racist murderer and a rapist (which the comic assumes is synonymous.) It also insults the reader for wanting the protagonist to succeed despite the only reason I finished it was to see the protagonist fail. He got away with everything. It's the type of comic Elliot Roger might have written.
 

iAmNothing

New member
Feb 22, 2012
66
0
0
I guess it's not particularly a "fuck you" but more of a heart-wrenching twist that occurs in the documentary Dear Zachary. Anyone who hasn't seen it should do so as soon as they have stocked up on tissues and are ready for a big weeping session.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,324
475
88
Country
US
inu-kun said:
Schadrach said:
Quantum Star said:
For the uninitiated, this a summary of the lead-up to the last alternate ending of a game called Drakengard:
To unlock this ending, you have to collect every weapon available in the game, which number upward of 60. Many of these weapons require you to complete bullshit difficult challenges, run around playing guessing games, exploring every last nook and cranny of the often huge maps, and in some cases, waiting around doing nothing for up to 20 minutes until one spontaneously appears.
After you manage all this, you finally get to fight the boss, and in this hack-and-slash Dynasty Warriors type game, the final boss is a bullshit hard rhythm game which requires 100% perfection, or else you have to try again from the start. If you managed to win against that, you earn this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G80XpHACiuw

And Drakengard 3 had something similar as well, which is both better and worse.
The most important question is this: Are any of the Drakengard 3 endings likely to spawn a spin-off game?

NieR could be argued to have it's share of Fuck You's too.

It's a game in which you are a man trying to save his daughter. The main villain is essentially the soul of the guy you were cloned from (to serve as a vessel for him, no less) who is trying to do exactly the same thing -- save the "soul" of his daughter by merging her with the person cloned from her.

Also, the "true" ending deletes your game save, and every ending results in man going extinct, because by stopping the antagonist you shut down the cloning process and the clones are sterile. That this would happen is not evident until the last 20 minutes or so of the game, at most.

Also, in new game +, you can hear the monsters for what they really are -- the scared and confused "souls" of people who aren't quite right because people don't keep that well without bodies.
Actually,
It's implied that Drakengard and Nier share the same world, with drakengard being a distant sequel to Nier, so humanity somehow survives, either they had a different terminal in europe (where drakengard series plays) or they found a way to restore it.
The final boss in 3 is still a giant fuck you.
I actually knew about the connection between the games, but you have it backwards, and that that's the case for Ending E of Drakengard specifically (this is the ending where Angelus gets shot down by fighter jets after defeating the Queen of Grostequeries, white chlorination syndrome being caused by the maso from remains of the "White Giant" and magic being developed from the remains of "Red Dragon"), while Drakengard 2 follows Ending A. Hence my comment about whether or not one of the endings would lead to a spin-off game.
 

wAriot

New member
Jan 18, 2013
174
0
0
There are a lot of "fuck you"'s out there, specially in the video game industry.

But in my opinion, the worst of them (because of how common it is) comes from the consumers themselves.
And it's when someone talks/posts about a glitch or bug they had in a game, and people reply along the lines of "it doesn't happen to me, so it isn't a problem".

They are as obnoxious as those who reply with "it works in my computer" or "works for me" in tech help forums (as a related note, people who reply "I'll send you the solution in a PM" score a second place).
 

TheWorstMuppetEver

New member
Jun 5, 2014
30
0
0
The first one that comes to mind for me is South Park's second season debut, 'Terrance and Philip in Not Without My Anus'. Soooo many people were about to find out who Cartman's father was and this episode was just a giant middle finger to everybody who waited. I'm pretty sure that was the biggest "fuck you" in Matt and Trey's long list of "fuck you's". Ahh, classic!


On a more personal level, the ending to LA Noire left me feeling a bit cold...
(Playing as Cole during the Arson Cases) Why does everyone hate me now? ;_; I can't walk down the street without someone a-shaking their fist at me! Is it because I'm with that German lady? How does everyone know? Also, now I'm dead in a sewer. They'll probably never find my body. Why is Weasel McGee at my funeral? Was this secretly Jack's story the whole time? I guess we'll never know...
 

Kyber

New member
Oct 14, 2009
716
0
0
One thing that happens in the movie Serenity.
Wash's death. His death didn't mean anything to the story, it was just a giant "fuck you, we need a sad thing to happen"

The only thing in that movie that I really had a problem with.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
The movie "Law Abiding Citizen". My God how I hate how it ended.

The ending for Mass Effect 3 (specifically not Shepard dying, but how she was killed off), Command & Conquer 4, Dawn of War: Soul Storm. And by grand extension; Every poorly ported console to PC game ever.

X-Men: The Last Stand, Wolverine's origin movies, Chun-Li's Streetfighter movie, The Bayformers movies, Indiana Jones & The Crystal Skull.
 

Kyber

New member
Oct 14, 2009
716
0
0
Unkillable Cat said:
Kyber said:
One thing that happens in the movie Serenity.
Wash's death. His death didn't mean anything to the story, it was just a giant "fuck you, we need a sad thing to happen"

The only thing in that movie that I really had a problem with.
I always felt that the point of that scene was to show that since it was almost certainly the shows swan song, nobody is safe. The following showdowns are supposed to be given an extra edge by it.
But I hoped that it would have meant something, it was so random and so out of nowhere, it felt so pointless.
 

beastro

New member
Jan 6, 2012
564
0
0
Someone mentioned the last for minutes of Lost as being this, I disagree.

The biggest one in the series was a few episodes before it where we get to see the backstory of Jacob and the Man in Black and discover that Jacob really was the complete ass he came off to be and the Man in Black was screwed over and demonized over having completely understandable and sympathetic motives, most of all, simply being a sensible, rational guy who didn't unquestionable do or agree with what his mysterious "mother" was up to.

But that's all semantics in the end, the biggest part of it is that it maintained what was constantly pushed thanks to the writers laziness and moral bankruptcy "The Man is Black is evil because we just say he is, so keep rooting for Jack as he becomes the last in a long line of people to fuck the poor guy over!"
 

bono9001

New member
Nov 9, 2011
2
0
0
Dalisclock said:
YuberNeclord said:
Actually that character was introduced before the last book in the Dark Tower series.
If you read Stephen King's 'Insomnia' you'll get to find out more about the origin of Patrick Danville. I actually haven't read any of the Dark Tower books, but I've read Insomnia a few times now, and every time I do it does make me want to give that series a go.
I actually got into the Dark Tower because of Insomnia.

Which is one of the reasons the Crimson King is so much of a Disapointment, considering all of the build up he was given in both the preceding books and Insomnia.

Don't get me wrong, the series is still good (though you can skip the middle 90% of book four and miss nothing worth talking about), it's just King apparently decided that he made the Crimson King too forboding and climatic sounding and took steps to remove any level of interest or threat he had once posessed.
I just wanted to add my two cents as a huge Stephen King fan...

I thought the entire second half of the final Dark Tower book felt rushed, not just the final confrontation but the entire lead up to it. In one of the earlier books King mentions in his afterward the gunslinger approaching the tower for an unimaginable final battle. What we got was nothing of the sort. Still, though, the series is more than worth reading and has some of the best moments I have ever read. In particular, I have never read a book with better and more ominous foreshadowing than The Waste Lands.

My final note is about skipping the middle of book 4. When I first read book 4, after years of waiting for it to come out, I was disappointed as it is mostly flashback. However, when King announced he was publishing the final three books one after another, I reread the first four to prepare. On a second reading, I found the 4th book to be my favorite. I was amazed since I was originally disappointed in it. I think it was because I knew what I was getting (a flashback) and also knew that the continuation of the real story was right around the corner. So I advise giving the fourth book another shot-- the flashback segment is, in my opinion, the most complete and well-plotted part of the Dark Tower story, and ranks among the best things King has ever written.
 

CrazyGirl17

I am a banana!
Sep 11, 2009
5,141
0
0
ThePurpleStuff said:
Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon not making proper DVD box sets of their old school cartoons, forcing me to get them through means I don't like or buy them off other people instead of just selling them online directly from their sites. It's like, "fuck you, no childhood nostalgia for you!" So I say right back, "then fuck you too, you don't deserve my money, you clearly don't want it in the first place."
Agreed, it's like all they care about is making the "nostalgia dollar" by putting their classic shows on late at night. It pisses me off to no end.

OT: The ending to Digimon Tamers is bullshit. Basically, the heroes have saved the day, but some some technobabble forces their partners to go back to the Digital World, or else be deleted forever. The very last few minutes are of Takato discovering a portal back to the Digital World... and that's it. What the fuck, writers!?! I know Digimon Tamers is the "darker and edgier" season, but couldn't you just give the characters a happy ending?!?
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,784
0
41
Sutter Cane said:
I think your problem is that your standards were set ridiculously high.There was no way that they were going to make drastically different levels for all of the choices that you made in the previous games (hell Skryim can't even have characters react to shit you've done within that same game. I mean I can be the archmage of the college at winterhold,the head of the theives guild and the listener for the dark brotherhood and it basically has no effect on anything outside their respective questlines. I know that has nothing to do with ME3 but it just really annoys me), and it's not like they have no effect on anything either. You get different dialogue, and different outcomes to the scenarios themselves. Also I don't really understand your point about character death. Sure you don't really see certain characters after a certain point, but in that case (and especially in the case of mordin) it's usually the end of their character arc. You might as well say that it doesn't matter if characters die at the climax of a film from a ramatic perspective, because the film is basically over and you never hear from them again (Unless there's a sequel). The death of well known characters is a legitimate consequence whether you want to admit it or not.
I think when playing a game that was built and sold 3 times on the promise that our choices would effect the fate of the universe, expecting some of those choices to come up, especially (ESPECIALLY!) the 2 at the climaxes of the previous games
Choosing the council seat and destroying/keeping the collector base. which were arguably the two most disregarded decisions in the series to at least have the most minute effect on literally any aspect of the story.

That was my standard going in to Mass Effect 3. if those two decisions were respected I probably would have let 75% of what they did slide, because I would have at least felt like they acknowledged the fact that the first 2 games existed.
When a character died in the suicide mission Bioware took that as an opportunity to write less, not differently, just less. or they replaced them with a character who was functionally the same


There's a mission where you fight Mirands's dad
and if Miranda survived ME2 she kills him
if she's dead you get to choose whether he lives or dies, but it doesn't matter because nothing he does comes up again
he doesn't continue working on the husk thing, you don't get to work with him, nothing.

People will accuse Mass Effect 2 of Cerberus railroading, but at least that was narrative justified. Mass Effect 3 has crucible railroading, which is stupid because it's the one option you know nothing about and it's the only option you're allowed to work towards (Wait choices... character deaths...right)


uh... when you first land on Rannoch with Tali her and Shepard have a really romantic scene regardless of you romanced her, or whether she was even loyal at the end of mass effect 2....
I mean if Tali is alive and an admiral (Which doesn't make sense) the Quarians shouldn't be at war with the Geth because her, Rahn and Corris all say they appose war and only Garrel and Xen are in favor of it. that's 3>2 how did Bioware get that wrong?

Ashley/Kaiden are both written out of the first half of the game
Daag and Grunt are the same character
Legion and Legion VI are literally the same character
Thane dies in such a stupid scene that it's impossible to feel anything for him

Anyway my point about Mordin is that saving him is hard to do (It's not, but what ever)
You need to keep Wrex alive and save the data in a renegade run. You need to make at least 1 decision that's outside your character's base. So it seems like it would be important.
But doing it nets you the same option as shooting Mordin in the back You get "Slarian numbers" instead of Krogan numbers"

That's really the core of it, everything is numbers, they're not people they're not choices they don't have any moral weight they're just numbers. they took all the emotional weight you invested in the first 2 games and boiled them down to math.

recognizing how bad Mass Effect 3 is doesn't have anything to do with my standards. Yes I liked the first 2 so I (Foolishly) expected the third one to be good, but it wasn't even bad, it turned out the absolute worst it could possibly have been. That's why it's a bigger fuck you than anything else I could imagine.
 

gridsleep

New member
Sep 27, 2008
299
0
0
Chemical Alia said:
I'm still not over the last ten minutes of the last episode of L O S T. It was kinda like when I watched that movie North as a kid (the earliest movie I recall raging over), but with a lot more investment.
I love hearing young people talk (or post "conversations.") Gives me a reason to shake my head and wonder why you don't realize there was an entire universe that existed for, like, eternity BEFORE 1995, or whenever your earliest memory resides.
 

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,865
0
0
Many movies have the "fuck you" attitude that I find extremely hypocrite. For example, in S1m0ne, the whole point of the movie was a critique of egotistical movie stars; while, at the same time, having Al Pacino chewing the scenery. It was like a parody of their aesop, while taking itself seriously.