All you guys are missing out on that sweet sweet Dr Facilier lovin'.
Dang son. He got the song, he got the looks, he even got the adorable voodoo dolls!
XMark said:James Earl Jones was awesome in the old Conan movie as the main villain. So much gravitas behind his every motion and every word. You totally believe that he could lead a cult and gain tons of fanatically devoted followers.
Stole two of my favorites.Malty Milk Whistle said:All you guys are missing out on that sweet sweet Dr Facilier lovin'.
Dang son. He got the song, he got the looks, he even got the adorable voodoo dolls!![]()
LifeCharacter said:Gotta be honest, I had a hard time seeing/taking Amon seriously as a villain. In any sense of the word. He was twisted and wanted power, sure, but he never really struck me as villainous in his actions, just differently viewed.renegade7 said:OT: I'm going to have to agree with this person
Ieyke said:Amon.
![]()
That and, well
Given the fact that Avatar Aang learned how to bend energies within himself and others, much like the Lion Turtles did in the time before the material and immaterial realms became separate, and the fact that once an avatar achieves the Avatar State the memories of their past lives combine. Korra would've learnt it on the spot and undone the damage that was done, so the entire first season "villain" to me was little more than a "let's see how long it takes Korra to achieve Avatar state for the first time" and less of a "Holy crap the Fire Lord is one evil SoB I can't wait until we see what he looks like and how he actually acts!"
Even at that, I never understood his motivation. I mean, I just don't get what the point of it all was, maybe I didn't pay enough attention and missed a crucial plot point or something but he just never struck me as an appropriately powerful villain, given Avatar Korra's personality being, well, pretty hot. By which I mean badass that can take care of herself, while also showing signs of weakness because she ultimately realizes she can't do EVERYTHING herself.
On topic, I haven't seen enough non-white villains to really compare with, I guess the closest I can think of would be Scar, but that's cheating, I mean, he's not even an anthropomorphic brown lion, he just happens to be differently colored than the rest of them, as if to say "Lookie here he's the villain!" I don't know if it's just a lack of searching or what the case is, but it seems to me like more often than not, the villain is non white simply "because I said so" and less to do with it being a part of the character because of actual human motivations.
But that's all he got. He didn't have a cohesive and well thought out plan, he didn't live up to the songs power and visual bombasity, he was, at best, a B- villain. Which sucks, because his villain song is among the best Disney ever produced.Malty Milk Whistle said:All you guys are missing out on that sweet sweet Dr Facilier lovin'.
Dang son. He got the song, he got the looks, he even got the adorable voodoo dolls!![]()
LifeCharacter said:Well depending on how you describe it a "villain" is really just the antagonist of the story, and Amon's views certainly put him in a very antagonistic position in relation to Korra specifically and benders generally. Sure he doesn't come across as blatantly evil, but that seems like a point in his and the creator's favor. Moral ambiguity is generally better than putting your heroes up against Hitler, unless you somehow make said Hitler fun to watch in some over the top way.Ninmecu said:Gotta be honest, I had a hard time seeing/taking Amon seriously as a villain. In any sense of the word. He was twisted and wanted power, sure, but he never really struck me as villainous in his actions, just differently viewed.
That and, well
Given the fact that Avatar Aang learned how to bend energies within himself and others, much like the Lion Turtles did in the time before the material and immaterial realms became separate, and the fact that once an avatar achieves the Avatar State the memories of their past lives combine. Korra would've learnt it on the spot and undone the damage that was done, so the entire first season "villain" to me was little more than a "let's see how long it takes Korra to achieve Avatar state for the first time" and less of a "Holy crap the Fire Lord is one evil SoB I can't wait until we see what he looks like and how he actually acts!"
Even at that, I never understood his motivation. I mean, I just don't get what the point of it all was, maybe I didn't pay enough attention and missed a crucial plot point or something but he just never struck me as an appropriately powerful villain, given Avatar Korra's personality being, well, pretty hot. By which I mean badass that can take care of herself, while also showing signs of weakness because she ultimately realizes she can't do EVERYTHING herself.
The problem with that is that Korra is spiritually weak in the first season to the point that she can't even air bend, meaning that there's no reason (beyond the knowledge that the good guys will win) to think that Korra will just suddenly get Avatar powers to fix everything. In addition, there's a big difference between Aang's energy bending someone's power away and Amon's blood bending someone into being incapable of bending. I mean, sure Korra could energy bend, but theoretically there's no reason to expect energy bending to be able to fix something physical like what Amon's blood bending seemed to be. Obviously that turned out to not be the case, but once it was revealed that Amon wasn't using some spiritual power but blood bending, spiritual powers stop seeming like the universal fix.
And Amon's motivation was that he hated bending and believed it to be a source of evil. After all, he and his brother were abused by their father for bending and, when he left and went to Republic City, he found benders running everything. The four nations send representatives to rule the council, rather than have representatives of the city (which is especially grating when you realize that Tenzin has a spot on the council even though he represents like a few hundred people at most), and gangs of benders terrorize people. You aren't supposed to see him as an evil SOB because he's not--at most he's someone who just took things too far--and you aren't supposed to wonder about how he looks and acts because he's a constant presence who's always taking part in things instead of being relegated to someone who does nothing until the finale.
As for being appropriately powerful, maybe I'm not understanding your meaning properly, but Amon is a martial arts master and likely on of the most powerful water benders in the world who has an army with advanced technology that manages to conquer Republic City and repel the navy sent after him. Had the creators not deigned to make Mako so cool as to be able to overcome blood bending, Amon would have won.
Yeah, but that's kind of the point of increasing representation, getting out of that mindset that "straight, white, cismale" is the default and everything else is just a deviation from that; and making it so that we can have female; gay or nonwhite characters "just cause" rather than as a statement. Because, there's a reason that our popular imagination of who can be the protagonist is so limited, and the "straight white cismale as default" is the reason for that.Ninmecu said:On topic, I haven't seen enough non-white villains to really compare with, I guess the closest I can think of would be Scar, but that's cheating, I mean, he's not even an anthropomorphic brown lion, he just happens to be differently colored than the rest of them, as if to say "Lookie here he's the villain!" I don't know if it's just a lack of searching or what the case is, but it seems to me like more often than not, the villain is non white simply "because I said so" and less to do with it being a part of the character because of actual human motivations.
LifeCharacter said:Ninmecu said:You're arguably right with regards to "Good guys always win." but unless they'd gone the route of lolfakeout, I wasn't really that intimidated by his presence because of the afformentioned Avatar State knowledge. Now admittedly we couldn't know for sure that the physical removal was un-doable by the spiritual nature of Energy Bending, it was a fair gamble in my books, which turned out to be correct. Also, despite the fact that Aang was in fact very spiritually gifted and clung to it nearly to the point of Zealotry(as seen throughout the series but most prominently in the Nightmares episode and the Lion Turtle moment.) it was mentioned by Avatar Rokku that the Avatar state is a defense mechanism, meant to save an Avatar from certain death. It wouldn't be a stretch to say that inevitably, an Avatar would be faced with a life or death scenario and would unlock the Avatar State of it's own accord.
As for Amon, you're right, that's very likely his motivation. I just have a hard time seeing those because having been in a very similar position(Minus the bending, which would be awesome.) I came out of it with a dramatically different outlook to most who have those situations. As for Tenzin, while he might only have the feelings of a few hundred people, in the grand scheme of things, the Fire Nation owes his people a lot of restitution for their past actions, giving them equal say in the formation of the future is a good way of maintaining a semblance of balance, it's also been shown that Tenzin has the peoples feelings at heart, for better or worse. While true Amon is meant to have a more in your face section to this story, given he was a key player in the events and moved things around to suit his needs, I just have more respect for Ozai from a purely villainous standpoint, not trying to downplay Amon. He was a pretty solid character in his own right, just not a villain in my books. Antagonist, yes, villain, no.
Yes he's an excellent bender, gifted with a uniquely powerful ability and has a lot going for him, it's just that we never saw him get a chance to really exercise a considerable amount of what he COULD do, he was relegated more to the back burner to Korra's Teenage Problems, which, in my opinion, hurt his chances to really solidify himself. Which is basically saying I wish he had more screen time to show that he was, in fact, a powerful foe who's motivations were strong and had the will of the people behind him. If it was in a more adult situation I'm sure he could've been a very villainous Villain. Whereas in this show, it's hard to give a character like him the room to become as powerful a force as he could've.
Do not under any circumstances assume that I'm claiming Korra or Aang are purely a childs show, they've both tackled some pretty out there plots and problems with an excellent story telling ability, love both series and hope they continue to raise the bar. I just feel that Amon would work more in a more adult-esque storyline, he strikes me as a more restrained/intellectual equivalent to Jagang the Just in The Sword of Truth series.In hindsight, it's a fairly good gamble to just assume that everything in the Avatar series will be solved by last minute spiritual powers. Aang survives being struck by lightning in the avatar state through magic water and doesn't have to give up pacifism because he met a Lion Turtle and learned energy bending, and Korra has not only had the Avatar state fix Amon's bloodbending, but also whatever the fuck you want to call the ending of the second season. That said, even if the Avatar state is a defense mechanism, Korra was never really in such a situation and, in fact, achieves the avatar state after the fact. I don't think Amon ever threatened to kill her or anyone else, just take away their bending, at which point they become harmless.
Well, while some people obviously come out of similar situations with different mindsets, there's also the fact that (and I'm assuming so sorry if I'm mistaken) you didn't have some incredibly clear trait to blame for the entirety of your and the world's problems. Bending resulted in child abuse, oppression, gang violence, death, and general inequality, which makes it a pretty good target. And I feel like it really just depends on how you're going to define villain, because there's a wide array of things it could be limited to from "an antagonist" to "cackling, genocidal madman."
That said, I feel like the lack of him showing his power really comes down to the way bending and fighting works in a city. The first episode shows what happens when traditional bending happens in a city: the city breaks. As such, you have more subtle displays of power. It's not until the second season when they're away from infrastructure that you see people really tear it up. In addition, Amon can't openly bend without blowing his cover, leaving his displays of power for most of the season to less fantastical things. He's a martial arts master who can defeat Lightning Bolt Zolt or Tahno in an instant; he can resist bloodbending out of sheer will (though bloodbending likely played a hand in it); and he has the power to take people's bending away; and he can blood bend without moving (putting him above King Bumi's chin bending). Seeing an actual bending fight would have been cool, but ill fitting, though just seeing more of the villain is also a plus.
And, while Tenzin is indeed good for the city, he doesn't represent the city and in the people's eyes I doubt it matters that the fledgling air nation got a position of authority because of genocide, it still leads to benders ruling over them.
I fully support the diversification of both Protagonists and Antagonists. However, what I don't support is it being shoehorned in without any logical reason beyond "lol diversity". If it informs the characters motivations through some way or enhances parts of a characters abilities, I've got no complaints. I just hate the argument that we need more non white characters because reasons.(Though admitedly, I'm a bit annoyed of the argument because I almost never hear the argument involve Native Americans, we tend to be put to the sidelines and when we are represented in a culturally accurate manner, it gets lauded as a negative. Take Connor for example, stoicism is considered by many tribes as an attribute that is greatly desired, but at the same time, I can understand why he wasn't seen as a good lead because of what we were brought up on.tbok1992 said:Yeah, but that's kind of the point of increasing representation, getting out of that mindset that "straight, white, cismale" is the default and everything else is just a deviation from that; and making it so that we can have female; gay or nonwhite characters "just cause" rather than as a statement. Because, there's a reason that our popular imagination of who can be the protagonist is so limited, and the "straight white cismale as default" is the reason for that.Ninmecu said:On topic, I haven't seen enough non-white villains to really compare with, I guess the closest I can think of would be Scar, but that's cheating, I mean, he's not even an anthropomorphic brown lion, he just happens to be differently colored than the rest of them, as if to say "Lookie here he's the villain!" I don't know if it's just a lack of searching or what the case is, but it seems to me like more often than not, the villain is non white simply "because I said so" and less to do with it being a part of the character because of actual human motivations.
Though, ironically, my two fave nonwhite villains actually do have race as a not-insignificant part of their stories, specifically the charismatically devious Dr. Facilier from "The Princess and the Frog" and the eerie; memetic "Candyman," played by the excellent Tony Todd in the film of the same name.