Thankyou for that- this explanation really should have been in the OP.Saelune said:For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_Renaissance
Also, how many femme fatale types have we seen in as one of the main non-villain characters Disney films in general? I haven't seen them all, but I can't really name others besides Meg off the top of my head. The fact that she's neither a damsel in distress nor a "warrior girl" type going against conventions set by others around her also makes her more unique in the Disney female character pantheon.Harlemura said:I'm not that big of a fan of the renaissance stuff, more of a Lilo and Stitch era kinda guy, but from that list I'd have to go with Hercules. I follow Game Grumps' Arin's reasoning that it's one of the best Disney movies because Hercules and Meg actually go on a date and get to know each other as opposed to the norm of the main couple just deciding they're in love and going from there.
Also it's a crime that Zero to Hero isn't more commonly regarded as a classic Disney song.
The Lion King is a pretty shoddy adaptation as well though, of either Hamlet or Kimba. I suppose you can give it some leeway considering it's a looser adaptation though.hermes said:The Lion King, easily.
I seem to be in the minority here, but I am not a fan of Hercules or The Hunchback, mostly because I am a purist when it comes to adaptations...
Regarding Fantasia 2000.Hawki said:Are we really getting into adaptation debate here? Because let's see...
-Little Mermaid: Adaptation
-The Rescuers Downunder: Adaptation
-Beauty and the Beast: Adaptation
-Aladdin: Adaptation
-The Lion King: Adaptation/inspiration (Hamlet, Kimba, whatever)
-Pocohontas: Historical fiction (actual authenticity aside)
-The Hunchback of Notre Dame: Adaptation
-Hercules: Adaptation/inspiration
-Mulan: Historical fiction/adaptation
-Tarzan: Adaptation
-Fantasia 2000: Original
It isn't the first time Disney adapted established stories/folk-tales/mythology/whatever, and it hasn't been the last time either. Of the Disney Revival era, the only movies that haven't been based on pre-established stories are Wreck-it Ralph and Zootopia, and even WiR takes heavy inspiration from game properties. Not that I'm complaining mind you.
I guess I never considered Lion King as an adaptation, more like an influence. When I saw it I haven't even read Hamlet, and it works as a story of its own, that shares some of its themes.Sonmi said:The Lion King is a pretty shoddy adaptation as well though, of either Hamlet or Kimba. I suppose you can give it some leeway considering it's a looser adaptation though.hermes said:The Lion King, easily.
I seem to be in the minority here, but I am not a fan of Hercules or The Hunchback, mostly because I am a purist when it comes to adaptations...
Also, I agree with your sentiments regarding Hunchback, it's so far off from the source material it should be called something completely different. Frollo as a straight-up villain? Phoebus as a hero? Talking gargoyles and an happy ending? No thanks.
And thank you.Saelune said:For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_Renaissance