Hmmm uh, I don't know much about my family tree. My great great grandpa was a sniper in WW2 and got killed my motor fire apprently, so that's pretty cool I guess. (not the getting blown up part but being a sniper lol)
Yeah the chances are highly possible but again isnt it like many are related by merging families and what not? not by DNA,Eamar said:As far back as we can trace the family name (several hundred years), my family have been completely unremarkable and never moved outside the south west of England, or even more than a few towns from where the line originated. That's just my direct ancestors though, plenty of random siblings of blood relatives moved further afield, and I don't know anything about my mother's ancestry.
I hate to break it to you, but if you go back that far we're probably all descended from him.killerguythefox said:share a interesting fact or history of your families bloodline,
My example, According to some research through church papers and people registers. My fathers side of the family goes back to a certain viking king named Harald bluetooth the king of denmark,Some of you may know him he was the first viking to become christian and he converted denmark to christianity, The current royal family more or less comes from this bloodline,
Since these papers can't be unaccurate i'm inclined to believe it.
Kinda funny when your heritage says your a royal *blueblood* as the term says. Besides that it means i'm a viking by blood,
Please feel free to share a piece of history of your heritage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_recent_common_ancestor
It's pretty awesome that you managed to actually trace it though![]()
Think about that statement for a moment... same thing. Mathematically, we have to all be descended from him, and our DNA didn't spontaneously generate itself. Others may not be able to trace the name through a line of males, but the DNA still got passed on.killerguythefox said:Yeah the chances are highly possible but again isnt it like many are related by merging families and what not? not by DNA,Eamar said:As far back as we can trace the family name (several hundred years), my family have been completely unremarkable and never moved outside the south west of England, or even more than a few towns from where the line originated. That's just my direct ancestors though, plenty of random siblings of blood relatives moved further afield, and I don't know anything about my mother's ancestry.
I hate to break it to you, but if you go back that far we're probably all descended from him.killerguythefox said:share a interesting fact or history of your families bloodline,
My example, According to some research through church papers and people registers. My fathers side of the family goes back to a certain viking king named Harald bluetooth the king of denmark,Some of you may know him he was the first viking to become christian and he converted denmark to christianity, The current royal family more or less comes from this bloodline,
Since these papers can't be unaccurate i'm inclined to believe it.
Kinda funny when your heritage says your a royal *blueblood* as the term says. Besides that it means i'm a viking by blood,
Please feel free to share a piece of history of your heritage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_recent_common_ancestor
It's pretty awesome that you managed to actually trace it though![]()