Hmm...I agree with the akimbo 1887's but I just recently started using akimbo Ranger's and I don't know what all the fuss is about. Yes, the shotguns are powerful but with the rangers you sacrifice so much accuaracy it is almost not worth it....imahobbit4062 said:While I'm guilty of using the M93 raffica sometimes I agree with the M16 and Famas.cannot_aim said:I agree and I would add the m16, famas, and the m93 raffica because with each of those if one god damn bullet hits you or even is within 30 feet of you your dead.imahobbit4062 said:I agree 100%miracleofsound said:Hmmm, so many...
Prince of Persia 2008:
The combat in that was the only thing that ever caused me to actually damage a controller. The analogue stick is jammed left after being hurled on the floor. Piece of shit game.
God of War:
Spinning blade columns in Hades. Yeah. Fun.
MW2:
Broken party system
Broken matchmaking
Campers,
1887s,
lag,
host advantage,
the fact that I'll never be as good as some of those lunatics online,
chopper gunner,
ac 130,
and the fucking NUKE.
Fuck the nuke, it has completely ruined the objective games.
I dont care if you activate the nuke, just dont do it halfway through the fucking game you fucking twat!
But still, the 1887s...if you use them I will send you many abusive messages saying how fucking cheap you are.
Why did they have to butcher my favourite Rainbow Six Vegas weapon? WHY!?
Of course I LOVE the M16 and Famas rifles...I hate automatic weapons and the burst weapons (including the Raffica) I absolutely love. However, they also have their downsides, primarily the fact that an automatic can fire faster overall and you have to kill someone with the first or second burst before they turn you into swiss cheese...
P.S. I don't find the Raffica to be all that accurate.