I agree.Abandon4093 said:Snip*
If I may, what isn't hot about that picture? Admittedly, people have different tastes, but with the exception of slightly over-done lipstick I'm not seeing anything even remotely barfable about that photo.Ossian said:Apollo45 said:She was hot. That's what Bay looks for when he makes movies; hot chicks, big explosions, and awesome special effects. Anyone who thinks she ever had acting ability needs to get their heads checked. And, on the same note, anyone who thinks she isn't hot needs to do the same.![]()
*BARF* *HEAVE* *GAG*
Not hot, any pictures you've seen she was hot, was extremely photoshoped.
Yeah, but Natalie Portman has been in stuff like "V For Vendetta" and "Black Swan". There's a REASON Megan Fox has only been in crap.clipse15 said:So all the people saying she can't act have seen her in what? Shitty action movies with poorly written characters? Wow you're all quick to judge. I've only seen the Star Wars prequels I guess Natalie Portman is the worst fucking actress i've ever seen
Cowabungaa said:Yaap, she's just screen filling. If anything, her career and skill as an actrice is a good representation of Mister Bay himself; on the surface she might be pretty to look at, but when you look under that thin veneer you see it's devoid of substance, quality and mostly just hot air.
That is, she as an actress. I of course have no idea what she's like in person.
But you know what's the worst about her? This:
![]()
Such a waste to see a pretty cute girl, despite all the make-up there, transform into a hideous Generic Bimbo Nr.6483. Fuck you Hollywood.
Silicon-filled boobs barely bounce.Accountfailed said:Two words.
Bouncy, bouncy!
The fact that's she's mostly plastic maybe?RAKtheUndead said:Something about her just leaves me completely cold.
Her hair and makeup are pretty badly done in all of this, this person explains it better then I ever could.Apollo45 said:If I may, what isn't hot about that picture? Admittedly, people have different tastes, but with the exception of slightly over-done lipstick I'm not seeing anything even remotely barfable about that photo.Ossian said:Apollo45 said:She was hot. That's what Bay looks for when he makes movies; hot chicks, big explosions, and awesome special effects. Anyone who thinks she ever had acting ability needs to get their heads checked. And, on the same note, anyone who thinks she isn't hot needs to do the same.![]()
*BARF* *HEAVE* *GAG*
Not hot, any pictures you've seen she was hot, was extremely photoshoped.
Alternative question; who would you say is hotter than her? Admittedly, she's not the absolute hottest girl ever made on this fair world, but she's certainly in the top 10% at the very least, and likely significantly higher.
But I agree with you, she is a very good looking gal, probably wouldn't be in my top 10, but still very hot.evilthecat said:If you mean post-processed, then that picture was photoshopped as well.
Let's face it, what's wrong with that picture isn't her. Her makeup is awful, like, amateur mistakes like choosing lipstick which clashes with her skin tone and then combining it with heavy mascara kinds of awful, stuff most girls learn when they're 15. She has too much blush, the contouring is seriously overkill. It's horrible, and someone should be fired for it.
I imagine the artist forgot that she'd be photographed in natural light. Indoors in lower light, that makeup might look okay, but assuming it's an award ceremony when's the last time anyone at an award ceremony got photographed inside the building? It's an amateur mistake.
Also, I don't know who decided to straighten her hair and emphasize the asymetrical parting, but they should probably be fired too. I can see why they did it, but it looks like some crappy 80s attempt at glamour.
She is attractive. Not really to me, but she has a very strong jawline, high cheekbones and good features which is pretty much 'attractiveness by numbers'. But she is a glamour model, and that means people are going to dress her in all kinds of cheesy shit. It's a problem with glamour modelling, not with her.
Ya but those movies came after the prequels which she was horrible in. So what makes you think that Megan Fox won't take the exact same route?Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:Yeah, but Natalie Portman has been in stuff like "V For Vendetta" and "Black Swan". There's a REASON Megan Fox has only been in crap.clipse15 said:So all the people saying she can't act have seen her in what? Shitty action movies with poorly written characters? Wow you're all quick to judge. I've only seen the Star Wars prequels I guess Natalie Portman is the worst fucking actress i've ever seen