mr. awesome said:
Spineyguy said:
Space Marine for me.
Now before anyone flames me with 'how could you forget Portal 2, Deus Ex and gears of war?' let me clarify.
Please can we stop glorifying the big franchises, they don't change anything from game-to-game, so they don't improve, let the stand-alone titles have the spotlight, just for a minute, it's what they deserve.
You say: Portal = Portal 2 and Deus ex = Deus ex: Human Revulotion
I say: this [http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110417162658/nonsensopedia/images/4/48/Son_I_am_disappoint.jpg]
I have already explained this once to someone else. I did not at any point say that Portal and Portal 2 were the same game, that is something you have wrongly inferred by sewing together two completely unrelated comments.
Portal 2 is sufficiently distinct from Portal to be considered its own game, but the mere fact that it is a sequel with its own fanbase and pedigree means that it should not get game of the year, because that is supposed to be about the quality of a game, not the dedication of its pre-decided fans or the amount of hype it gets.
Portal 2 was great, it was a genuinely excellent game which I find hard to criticise in any way, but that doesn't change the fact that it wasn't original. As soon as you make a sequel to an existing game, as soon as you feel the need to stick a 2 on the end of the title, you have stopped making an original game.
If GotY were about a company's ability to maintain standards and consistently produce good games, Valve would win it like clockwork, but it's not (or, at least it shouldn't be). Game of the Year should be about originality, flare, style
and overall quality, not the amount of money you pump into a franchise.