VG_Addict said:
Nintendo makes a profit on both hardware and software.
Except when they don't, but we've been over this before. I posted several links detailing how your claims were false, and you've gone back and made the same claims in a new thread.
I'm saying that people who want Nintendo to go third party, IMO anyway, essentially want them to go bankrupt.
Based on no real facts or information. Basically, you'r trying to turn "I hope I can play their games" into ill will. That is disingenuous.
VG_Addict said:
Except Nintendo has consistently sold hardware at a profit. This has already been established.
Sorry, but now you're specifically lying. You've been shown this to be not true, and you're asserting it anyway. I'm sorry, but that's a flat out lie.
So the question is, why? Why cleave to what you know is wrong?
VG_Addict said:
Do you think more people want them to go third party because of the Wii U being underpowered and having no thir dparty support? Do you think that has influenced them?
I already answered this question, too. But to answer again, I don't think it's particularly that simple.
I do think the lack of power and third party support is an issue, but there are other problems, and problems that led to these problems. Nintendo has had a "fuck you, you'll do what we say" attitude since the NES days. It worked with the NES and SNES, but publishers started to jump ship even a generation later. Nintendo has spent a lot of time creating animosity with publishers and developers, which has led to their current scenario of third party support. Further, Nintendo went whole hog with the Wii when they decided they were going to court the fad market, and they damaged their brand in a lot of eyes right there. People are reticent to trust Nintendo like they once did, even if they want Nintendo games.
And this is console specific. The 3DS is selling better (though still an issue for Nintendo) in part because Nintendo has always dominated the handheld market. All of my 3DS games right now are Nintendo IPs (Zelda, Mario, Pokémon, etc) because the DS/3DS model is a competent one. I was initially put off by the 3D, though, and a lot of people seemed to be in the same boat. Nintendo's hardware is an obstacle not just because of of its power, but because they hide behind gimmicks like 3D and motion controls when a lot of people just want game hardware to play games.
This goes back to Nintendo making a profit on hardware. They may be making one now on the Hardware, but they were taking a loss before the price cut and a bigger one after the price cut. Part of what hurt them, if you ask me, is that they failed to differentiate the hardware beyond the 3D tech which is what made it so expensive in the first place. The 3DS is a competent system with good games, but the 3D is kind of a dumb add-on and made it look like it was just a DS with a new gimmick attached.
Nintendo has been so certain their name can move consoles they've stepped deliberately into loss leader for their last console and their last handheld. And in both cases, it bit them in the ass. Their hardware has become a liability.