I enjoyed Pulp Fiction. I havn't seen Kill Bill the whole way through, and havn't seen Resevoir Dogs, Jackie Brown or Death Proof. However I was hugely underwhelmed by Inglorious Basterds, mostly because it advertised itself as a comidic action film, not unlike James Bond in it's persona. What I got was a mountain of dialogue which I found completely uninteresting, and a few scenes of action littered throughout, as if by accident he made a film based on the exposition character. And then they threw in a random 'shoot-nazi-in-face' scene which, because i thought was just clutching at straws for drawing back some of the people who, like myself, expected action to some degree. I can sumarise the film into 5 main parts;
1) The bear jew
2) Churchill
3) Guy getting shot in the balls
4) Bon-jer-no
5) Hitler getting his face turned into a sieve
Ok, I'll admit, it wasn't a bad film. It just wasn't what it sold itself as. I don't go to an action film for dialogue for the same reason I don't read a book for the writer's note. They're not exactly what you look for, but you expect them to be there to a lesser extent.
Edit: To be honest I only think the bear jew is an important part because it gives an insight into the vivid detail which this film decides to go into, rather than what usually happens of cutting to the next scene right before the strike.