Your thoughts on Zynga

Recommended Videos

Shintsu2

New member
Apr 30, 2009
123
0
0
And for those who can't be bothered to care, Zynga makes those Facebook games like FarmVille and such (I only know because I have friends who are addicted to their stupid "games"). It's funny how no game developers feel like treating them with any respect.

I gotta say that stuff like FarmVille is so stupid. It has 83 million people playing monthly, and asides from not being hard I see no real point. People tried to get me to play it but it's stupid - if I'm going to play a game like FarmVille I'd rather play Harvest Moon, it's way better made and offers more satisfaction from playing than that thing does. The game is just a stupid addiction like a drug, people just non-stop can't stop playing it, coming back and checking their crops. And it forces the people playing it to never stop. Unlike normal games with saves that end the game when you "power off" it never stops. Even games that people would liken to it (MMOs namely, like WoW) log your character off when you stop. It's not like you get attacked and killed while you're not playing.

What really steams me is how the sheep playing it feel the need to tell us people who've been playing games for years "Get over it, this is what new games are becoming". No, I can accept a change in the video game world - look how it's changed over time I mean it's nothing like Pong and Pac-man. And the people who played that stuff wouldn't say the changes we've made to get where we are now are BAD, but FarmVille could potentially damage the fiber of what games SHOULD be. Something worthwhile and meaningful. At the end of the day of playing FarmVille, what did you accomplish? Got more money to buy more crops to get more money planting more crops. Oh and you can buy special things to show other people how little of a life you have to pour into something that never accomplishes anything. Complexity is needed for games to have some sense of quality, even the slightest bit! After beating Final Fantasy - you have a rich story you're the better for, games like FPSes you have exciting action and memorable sequences, lots of games you can replay over and over (Like RTS games, or really any good game in any genre).

What replay value does FarmVille have? None, because it never ends. And you never accomplish anything. I'll allow it game defenition yes, but so is 52-card pickup - in the sense it gives you something to do and by the end you at least did something. In 20 years would anyone go, "MAN that FarmVille was so great!" - no, because it offers nothing memorable to the gaming world. Nothing unique, special, or worthwhile.

That said, Zynga is at the bottom of my list - down there with Activision and whatnot (But even Activision has more integrity and quality than Zynga). They contribute nothing except time killers, so why do people jump to defend a time killer? If you like it fine, but stop saying this is redefining the gaming world. No, you have an addiction - it's not redefining anything but yourself as a zombie who can't stop playing the same repetetive thing and still never accomplishing much more. Like the carrot on a stick on a treadmill - never gets anywhere and never really accomplishes anything.

So, what are your thoughts?
 

Ophiuchus

8 miles high and falling fast
Mar 31, 2008
2,095
0
0
Without meaning to be all Search Nazi, I think we've pretty well covered the Zynga thing recently, what with March Mayhem and these staff-written articles:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/6.185160-Experienced-Points-Zynga-and-the-Rise-of-the-New-Gamer
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/6.187811-A-View-From-the-Road-FarmVille-Isnt-Going-Away

But, since I don't think I commented on either of those: I'm not a fan, for the whole range of reasons as expressed by dozens of people already. Not much point in me reiterating stuff that's already been done to death.
 

Urgh76

New member
May 27, 2009
3,083
0
0
Meh

its alright itself for like a casual thing, but the amount of drones that it crates is unforgivable
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
... to play devil's advocate.. you do get a bigger and bigger and more and more varied farm... Heck, you see thecaptainof's avatar? you could do pixelated images on your farm. That, to me, sounds interesting. Something to get done in a week's time and then never touch the "game" again.

But I already have my time wasters: classic, great games like Asteroids, Space Invaders, Pandemic 2, that sort of thing.
 

SnootyEnglishman

New member
May 26, 2009
8,308
0
0
If you wanna play that and waste hours upon hours trying to build a virtual farm that's fine with me. If it all goes to you're head and you suddenly think that you are some kind god among men and you can beat any game you touch i have the utmost contempt.
 

Composer

New member
Aug 3, 2009
1,281
0
0
Shintsu2 said:
\ if I'm going to play a game like FarmVille I'd rather play Harvest Moon, it's way better made and offers more satisfaction from playing than that thing does.
ive made this arguement many times...sadly noone believes me...
 

GBlair88

New member
Jan 10, 2009
773
0
0
Slightly On/off topic: I guess the way of differentiating between a casual game and a 'normal' game would be one that has simple controls and easy to learn gameplay. One that lets you play it in short periods of time.

Or maybe it's similar to what makes sports (football, rugby etc.) and games (darts, chess) different is that you can drink a pint while playing a game, but not when taking part in a sport. If you were playing a casual game like Farmville you could do other things such as watch TV, eat lunch or whatever whereas with a more 'hardcore' game such as Battlefield, you need to concentrate on the game to play it.

Saying that I would watch films while playing EVE and I wouldn't consider it a casual game but hey ho.
 

Tasachan

New member
Jan 28, 2010
461
0
0
I played Farmville for a few weeks, then quit. I would log on to 100s of notifications from people sending me gifts (namely, my father) and sometimes I felt like I was planning my day around my crops. "Yeah, we can go out to lunch, but I have to be back by three to harvest my strawberries." I finally went, "wait, whyyyy amd I doing this to myself?!"
There is no end to the game. You make more experience by buying bundles of hay than planting/harvesting the actual crops. - And you can fit like 9 hay bundles into one square, versus one crop...

ANYWAYS.

I think many people started Farmville because it gave them something to do on Facebook. Then they didn't want to lose their gold they wasted planting crops, so they went back to harvest them... and it became a vicious cycle. Though, kind of a stupid reason to play... hey, whatever right?
But why spend actual money on these games? Whhyyyy??? I don't get it! Zynga makes so much money from these games, and it doesn't even make sense! Its such a scam. =|
 

Davrel

New member
Jan 31, 2010
504
0
0
I used to play farmville - but stopped after I found that getting people to harvest cotton from my elaborately planned Swastika fields was losing its entertainment value.
 

Tony2077

New member
Dec 19, 2007
2,984
0
0
i don't like them after reading the wiki controversy stuff


offtopic i hate snow wet heavy snow
 

ghostinthenight

New member
Aug 18, 2009
21
0
0
GBlair88 said:
Or maybe it's similar to what makes sports (football, rugby etc.) and games (darts, chess) different is that you can drink a pint while playing a game, but not when taking part in a sport. If you were playing a casual game like Farmville you could do other things such as watch TV, eat lunch or whatever whereas with a more 'hardcore' game such as Battlefield, you need to concentrate on the game to play it.

Saying that I would watch films while playing EVE and I wouldn't consider it a casual game but hey ho.

If you can't drink a pint and play Battlefield at the same time then you're doing it wrong :p
 

ghostinthenight

New member
Aug 18, 2009
21
0
0
Davrel said:
I used to play farmville - but stopped after I found that getting people to harvest cotton from my elaborately planned Swastika fields was losing its entertainment value.
...I don't think that could ever possibly lose entertainment value....
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
I think they are scam artists, I think they play dirty and I think they don't have a single orignal bone in their body.

I could care less if they appeal to the casual gamers. I actually encourage new gamers to get into gaming more. But I just can't support a game developer who uses "Every dirty trick in the book."

While most game developers attempt to come up with an orginal story, fun gameplay, and spend months and months attempting to perfect the game, Zynga copies a previous idea from another developer, try to brush it up with their own skins and then release it. If this is what the future of gaming is gonna be in a couple years, then I may as well throw my Xbox out the window.