Your view on Sarah Palin and others' anti-wolf agenda?

Recommended Videos

Shotgun_Ninja

New member
Jun 2, 2009
31
0
0
No, I don't think I'm on board with this anti-wolf agenda for two reasons: (1) Sarah Palin, while a milf, is an idiot and (2) because wolves are awesome. However, I wholeheartedly approve of an anti-bear agenda, and intend to base my entire political campaign entirely on promises to rid our forests of "the ursine menace", with my bare hands (no pun intended) if necessary.

 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
I'm pro-wolf! Personally I think they need to be reintroduced to the uk to keep the deer numbers in check so we don't need to keep shooting them.
 

Shotgun_Ninja

New member
Jun 2, 2009
31
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
I'm pro-wolf! Personally I think they need to be reintroduced to the uk to keep the deer numbers in check so we don't need to keep shooting them.
Sir, your username goes against everything I stand for. That is all. Good day.
 

Fortunefaded

New member
Aug 12, 2004
113
0
0
pln9fos said:
Hi there everyone. I don't know if this topic ought to be in politics or not; I decided here because it has to do more with wildlife, although it is part of Palin and company's political agenda. I decided to post this because as someone who really cares about wolves, I wanted to see what others thought about what I view as a cruel practice that ought to be illegal. Please give me your views if you have the time.
Sheesh. Not everyone from this forum is from Alaska or the united states. Post some info on w/e you are talking about. I have no idea what the agenda is. In regards to where to post it, could be posted in the religion and political section as although it affects you a personal side due to nature of wolves/animals from what you've mentioned it is a political issue.

Don't mind where it is posted tbh.

tldr: Post a link to this 'anti-wolve' agenda.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Shotgun_Ninja said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
I'm pro-wolf! Personally I think they need to be reintroduced to the uk to keep the deer numbers in check so we don't need to keep shooting them.
Sir, your username goes against everything I stand for. That is all. Good day.
I'm all for militant bears in the UK too, which is fine as bears and wolves rarely endanger eachother.
 

Shotgun_Ninja

New member
Jun 2, 2009
31
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
I'm all for militant bears in the UK too, which is fine as bears and wolves rarely endanger eachother.
Sir, are you not aware of the evils bears represent? Little known fact: bears force our elderly into performing sexual favors.



Do you want that kind of strain on your grandmother's heart? DO YOU?! How would you feel if dear ol' granny went into bear-handjob-induced cardiac arrest? Not too good, I would imagine.
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,977
0
0
Wolves are so awesome! I don't see how anyone could think about hunting them :c
 

Enigmers

New member
Dec 14, 2008
1,745
0
0
I think there are much bigger and better things to spend your time and money on.
 

ploppytheman

New member
May 15, 2010
97
0
0
The hunter has become the hunted. I'd probably hunt moose or whatever else tastes good, not sure why you would hunt a predator unless they are overpopulated (like coyotes).
 

ploppytheman

New member
May 15, 2010
97
0
0
Rottweiler said:
Populations of animals caused Extinctions long before Man.
Animals dont have wars like people do. Animals don't fight with nuclear arms. How can you love with nuclear arms? You can't hug with nuclear arms.

jk

The days are getting colder. Yes. Wolves are dying by the truckload! Ha ha ha! Good riddance to 'em all! ? I like fall.
 

Ldude893

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2010
4,114
0
41
No Wolves = Food Web screws up = Environmental disaster

I always knew Sarah Palin hated Nature, and I dislike her because of that.
 

direkiller

New member
Dec 4, 2008
1,655
0
0
ObsessiveSketch said:
direkiller said:
The vice president has less power then Miley Cyrus(and thats a scary thing)
That's what the Republican party said when they appointed the no-good trouble-making loony named Teddy Roosevelt to the position. Then, hey presto, Mckinley's dead and the person they wanted to put out of the way is now the most powerful in the country. (Thank God he did a great job, 'ey?)

McCain, bless his old bones, is still alive. But there's no aspirin in the world that could lower my blood pressure if Palin was one stroke (literally) away from the Oval Office.

Only, unlike Roosevelt, she would...y'know...end the world.

PS. Wouldn't it just leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth if the first woman president was decided by presidential succession?
but but the teddy bear that's something good right

also the economy was due to crash regardless of who was in office because of practices of buying on margin and groups of people artificially inflating prices.

The current market crash was not George bushes fault. Jimmy Carter mandated the bad loans that got us were we were today. It just takes time for the economy to crash(more time then said president is in power that get blamed for everything).

I thought more people would get mad over the fact there is regulated hunting of wales in Alaska for a food source and i used this as a reason why i don't see any problem with regulated hunting of wolves