Your views on Underage Sex?

Recommended Videos

Legendairy314

New member
Aug 26, 2010
610
0
0
In the immortal words of South Park, "17, you're ready." I believe that's a decent age that has the most compromise between sex early and actually understanding the consequences. Any younger than that and I just see the number of mistakes rising considerably. So even 16 is a stretch for me.
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
The thing a lot of people fail to see is we are programmed to do it.

I find that if you are careful, and don't become like a slut, you are fine.
Do it every once in a while, I can understand.

Do it constantly, that's where I draw the line.
Why? As you say, we are programmed to do it, our bodies activally encourage us to do it (with arousal, orgasms and such) so why not? I play videogames because they're a ton of fun, I have sex because it is also a ton of fun! (Alright, I'll spill, I'm not actually old enough to have sex, but I masturbate a lot so close enough (not really but it'll do))
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18 (dont quote me on those numbers), so whats underage in america isnt always in sweden
But really, as long as its not forced on them, with someone of the same age and they know what theyre doing, i dont see whats wrong, but below teenager years and its just wrong for me :S
And i think its upto people what they do, its their bodies and so forth
Oh and big age differences unless the youngest is at least 16 or 17 is not only wrong put probably counts under pedophilia

Kinda complicated when you think about it without saying no outright
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
The thing with the age limits is they are just arbitrary numbers. Britain has 16, America 18, Spain 13. These numbers don't really mean anything, but you have to make a line somewhere. In Britain we have 16 because at 16 you can leave school, in America I assume it's because 18 is when you become an "adult". I guess Spain chose 13 as the beginning of puberty.

If you didn't have the line then anyone could have sex. And none of us want 8 year olds getting it on.

So we've got to have a line somewhere, and really, and we might as well respect that line or why bother having one at all?
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
Well there's only so far stomping around say "YOU KIDS SHOULDNT HAVE SEX" will work, it does result in a lot of kids feeling like they can't talk about it to their parents, as awkward as that is anyway they're basically told they best lie about it or they will be in trouble.

Contraception should be readily available to kids, I don't think them having sex is a good thing but at least let them have access to safe sex. Of course this won't prevent EVERY underage pregnancy but it prevents a lot more than having no contraception whatsoever. I remember being a young teenager and wanting sex pretty fucking badly. I didn't really talk about it with my parents but they were smart enough to arm me with condoms.

But naturally I'm against people over the age of consent having sex with people below and I know this must be a faded line when you've just hit that age but deal with it and find someone else to stick it in!
 

Deadlock Radium

New member
Mar 29, 2009
2,276
0
0
Gennadios said:
If there's grass on the field, play ball.

OT: I think that if they're both matured, use contraceptives, are in a good relationship and they both agree to do it, they should be 15.

I just find it unsettling (Dunno if that word can be used in this context.) when I hear about people under that age having sex. Here in Norway, the legal age is 16, though, and I'm fine with it being that "high", as younger than that is kinda disturbing.
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
Underage sex is kinda really not thinking, the only safe way to have sex is by not doing it. And if you're that horny you need to feel like you need to be having sex at..what are the kids these days doing it at?*reads newspaper* GOOD GOLLY 13 seriously! I mean comeon! Wait till you're 18 or something!
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
Ah ok then, so not as easy to get around as i thought, if its based upon where you live it might be harder to get around in theory, but how easy is it to enforce in reality? Ignoring actually catching them but say tracking them to where they live if they had skipped to a state with a lower age of consent?
 

xvbones

New member
Oct 29, 2009
528
0
0
orangeban said:
xvbones said:
Count Igor said:
or mature 15 year olds (I say 15 as it's close to 16)
There is no such thing as a 'mature' 15 year old.

15 year old claiming to be mature are precisely as immature as 15 year olds with no illusions about their inexperience and immaturity.

Unless that 15 year old was brought up in a war zone or has otherwise spent the majority of their life taking care of themselves and/or others, in which case that 15 year old would likely not be on this forum, discussing such frivolous things as 'when fucking is appropriate', they would be in the process of taking care of themselves and/or others.

I mean no offense to any teenagers in this thread or on this forum who think that being well-read, reasonable or intelligent is the same as 'mature.'

It isn't.

You're not.

It's to do with your life and experience:

At 15, you've spent about 3 years, tops, with any responsibility whatsoever, if that, you've had almost no life experience and have barely had time to make any catastrophic mistakes to learn from (the process called 'growing up.')

As for whether or not you're ready to have sex, that's nobody's business but yours, hers and your parents. Talk it over with them.

And wear a fucking condom.
I don't think you can wave of all 15 year olds as not being mature (even if we don't count those who grew up in war zones or who looked after themselves totally alone).

We all learn from experiences in different ways, some take petty mistakes and learn huge amounts, some lose limbs and learn nothing. 3 years of life experience could be more than enough for some, 30 years can be lacking for others. There is no magical point where you've had enough experience to be mature.

Besides, maturity is just about knowing how to react sensibly to things, common sense and (effectively) tact. It isn't some worldly wisdom that can only be picked up by living for decades.
Actually, I can wave all the 15 year olds off as not being mature because they aren't. Maturity isn't wisdom, wisdom is wisdom (15 year olds do not have wisdom either, as they have not been alive long enough to accumulate it), what maturity is, see, is maturity.

The word 'mature' literally means 'aged'. 'Fully grown'. 'Your personal peak of physical an mental development.' Taken literally or metaphorically, at 15 you have miles and miles to go. You have barely started. You are not even expected to be mature for another six years, nor are you likely to be especially mature even then.

You also need to understand, I'm not saying that the inherent immaturity of a young teenager (who in America is really not actually legally responsible for his own actions, cannot vote, cannot drink, cannot fight for his country, cannot legally hold most jobs) is a bad thing, nor that young teens are bad for their inherent immaturity. It goes with the territory, it is part of being human.

At 15, see, what you are is hormonal.

Let me put this in terms easily understood by this forum:

At 15, you are a noob.

You went through puberty at most 4 years ago, more likely three.
Your junk has only been in a functional state for less years you have fingers on your favorite hand.
Three years ago, you were in the age range Jar-Jar Binks was aimed at.
Ten years ago you were barely capable of forming complete sentences.
There are people who have been striving for decades to achieve true emotional maturity, do you honestly think you have it all figured out after three years?

With respect, you are a noob.

A lowbie, attempting to pretend you are no different than an endgame raider, but you're not.
Not because you lack the logic, the reasoning or intellectual capacity, because you have seen almost nothing of the content.
Your gear is shit and your build is rudimentary and incomplete, it will be years before you even know enough about yourself to fully form your own personality.

You are still leveling.

(btw, wear the fucking condom.

Also, everyone else in the world has felt the exact same drippy, butterflies-in-the-stomach omgsheismyentireworld that you are, you're not hardly the only one and everybody else does actually know precisely what you're going through, because they either have already gone through it or they in the process of going through it.

When it ends, for fuck's sake don't write poetry about it.

And if you write the fucking poetry, for fuck's sake keep that shit hidden, do not ever let anyone else read it, it's not deep, it's not beautiful, it doesn't reveal your tormented soul, all it does is make people avoid you because unless your name is Byron, your weepy, sorrowful poetry will invariably be wretched, godawful shit that will never stop embarrassing you.)
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
sumanoskae said:
I don't see how this is any of my business. Sex is sex, people insist on demonizing it, but that's all it is. It's not mine nor anyone else's right to tell people what to do with their free time. Things like STD's and teen pregnancy would be less common if people would just support the choices their children make and stop trying to engineer their lives.

People need to stop assuming that just because sex was a big deal for them that it will mean exactly the same thing for everyone else
Actually, considering the fact that some of the tax I pay goes to sponsoring stupid teenage mothers in the form of government welfare (which every parent or couple get in my country to insure that their kid doesn't starve to death or have to walk around without clothes) I'd say it IS my business to some extent if stupid, underage teenagers practice unsafe sex and the stupid, naive 14 year old girls refuse to have an abortion because they can "surely make it" as a parent, despite the fact that they aren't even through school yet and will most likely doom both themselves and their spawn to a life of being social parasites.

If I got to actually CHOOSE what MY taxmoney paid for, then I couldn't care less how much underaged kids fucked around with eachother or how many doomed babies shot out of their nether regions, because I sure wouldn't be the one paying for it (i'd invest my mandatory share of the taxes in more worthy pursuits like science or the weapons industry). But now that my government pretty much force me to pay for such unnecessary "delights", I think it's reasonable to say that it IS my business and that I AM entitled to an opinion about who fucks with who, how and why.
 

xvbones

New member
Oct 29, 2009
528
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
sumanoskae said:
I don't see how this is any of my business. Sex is sex, people insist on demonizing it, but that's all it is. It's not mine nor anyone else's right to tell people what to do with their free time. Things like STD's and teen pregnancy would be less common if people would just support the choices their children make and stop trying to engineer their lives.

People need to stop assuming that just because sex was a big deal for them that it will mean exactly the same thing for everyone else
Actually, considering the fact that some of the tax I pay goes to sponsoring stupid teenage mothers in the form of government welfare (which every parent or couple get in my country to insure that their kid doesn't starve to death or have to walk around without clothes) I'd say it IS my business to some extent if stupid, underage teenagers practice unsafe sex and the stupid, naive 14 year old girls refuse to have an abortion because they can "surely make it" as a parent, despite the fact that they aren't even through school yet and will most likely doom both themselves and their spawn to a life of being social parasites.

If I got to actually CHOOSE what MY taxmoney paid for, then I couldn't care less how much underaged kids fucked around with eachother or how many doomed babies shot out of their nether regions, because I sure wouldn't be the one paying for it (i'd invest my mandatory share of the taxes in more worthy pursuits like science or the weapons industry). But now that my government pretty much force me to pay for such unnecessary "delights", I think it's reasonable to say that it IS my business and that I AM entitled to an opinion about who fucks with who, how and why.
You pay about fifteen cents per year towards unwed mothers.

I'm fairly certain you can spare it.

And if you don't want to spare it, tell your congressman you'd prefer your fifteen cents per year go towards sex education and contraception.



Edit: You mention 'stupid teenage mothers' who 'don't want to get an abortion' because they're certain they can hack it.

So. What about the dads?
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
Ah ok then, so not as easy to get around as i thought, if its based upon where you live it might be harder to get around in theory, but how easy is it to enforce in reality? Ignoring actually catching them but say tracking them to where they live if they had skipped to a state with a lower age of consent?
Generally they buy hotel rooms(were you must be over 18 to rent a room) or have sex in a car, in a parking lot, usually police officers stroll by parking lots and if they catch you they have to arrest or call your parents.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
xvbones said:
You pay about fifteen cents per year towards unwed mothers.

I'm fairly certain you can spare it.

And if you don't want to spare it, tell your congressman you'd prefer your fifteen cents per year go towards sex education and contraception.
It doesn't matter if I can spare it or not, the fact that it's money that society claims that im obliged to pay out of my salary, going to something I really don't see a viable reason paying for, gives me the right to have a fucking opinion about it (which was the point I was making in respons to the post I quoted).

I have a right to have an opinion of other people's sex life if society force me to pay for the resulting and costly mistakes of other people's sex life. It's that simple. I PAID for that right after all.

xvbones said:
Edit: You mention 'stupid teenage mothers' who 'don't want to get an abortion' because they're certain they can hack it.

So. What about the dads?
The dads are idiots as well. But the mother is ultimately responsible since it's legally her decision whether a costly parasite to society is going to be born or not, since it's up to her if she's going to undergo an abortion or not.

If abortion never was an option that women had a been given a right to, then the responsibility would be equally shared.
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
I remember having lots of under-aged sex, and I remember it being EXTREMELY fun.

Seriously, if two sexually mature, consenting humans want to slap nasties, that is entirely their business. I lost my virginity when I was 14, and I'm a perfectly healthy, functioning adult with no diseases, children, or psychological issues.
 

LTAshler

New member
May 26, 2011
63
0
0
It's unwise at best. Even if there were zero risk of STDs, the emotional damage caused when the relationship breaks up is always a factor. At the age of 16 it is prohibitively unlikely that the relationship will ever reach a lifetime partnership arrangement. Even if the initial persons involved are *largely* unaffected emotionally (also very unlikely, especially at that age) someone in one of their later relationships will be hurt. The same can be said (perhaps to a lesser extent) about adult relationships.
Sex is approached with such a casual air these days and it really shouldn't be. It is a deeply interpersonal act that belongs on the Marriage bed. Call me draconian if you wish, but I've talked to dozens of people both of age and otherwise, from various levels of sexual 'experience, and those who didn't wait have been far and away more irritable, sad and remorseful (especially in their relationships) than those who have.
My stand on sexual behavior was shaped in very large measure by this simple observation.
 

DarkishFriend

New member
Sep 19, 2011
265
0
0
Honestly, I don't know how I feel about this. My first sexual experience that actually involved something physical came at 17, and even then it wasn't sex. At the time I understood the consequences and the key part, my responsibilities if I wasn't careful. When I was 15 and trying to get with one girl I wouldn't have given the proper gravity to any of the possibilities. Kids, diseases, and sex complicates everything.

At 12 - 14, that just sounds creepy to think about. My best friend had sex at 14 and when though she developed early, that still sounds creepy to me. I mean, who wants to have sex that young? The girl's boobs are squares and the guys still look like females. And as others have said, the younger it gets, the harder it is to educate them about it and really determine consent and what is appropriate and not. At 12 - 13 I would've had no idea what to do, even though I watched porn and took the sex ed classes.

The best way to go about this would probably not to be so scared of the subjects in schools and focus more on teaching kids safe methods, because odds are they are gonna do it anyways, they might as well be smart about it. All of my close guy friends lost their virginity without condoms and say using them is stupid, which is beyond idiotic for me. Most of them can't even hold down education + job and why they would risk the chance of a kid for some extra pleasure is beyond me. In my opinion, the good age to start getting sexually active is around 15, which of course doesn't mean just going straight into sex. It's like baby steps, I didn't get interested in a girlfriend/sex (seriously) until late 15s.

That said, if I had a daughter I know I would have a huge double standard, because I know how guys think because I am one, and I have seen how others have acted about their girlfriends. I'd probably be torn hard between giving them the personal freedom I had when I was a kid, and protecting them from themselves. I know utter protection isn't the best policy, but at that point, the kid is not able to deal with the consequences. I think I would try my hardest to make my daughter think smart if she was going to. I'd make sure to have the talk with my kids, because my parents didn't with me. Though, I didn't exactly need it.

EDIT: xvbones that is probably the best analogy I've ever read. Also, I think consent varies on state because in NC the age is 16 and if more than 4 years apart if one is under 16 is a felony.