Zero Consequence

[COR 2000]

Rid the world of Idiots, Racists, Chavs, and anyone else lacking a brain.

 

[Ursus Astrorum]

I'd walk into Fort Knox and take half the gold stored there. I'd then sell it and use the money to live peacefully for the rest of my days in a small cottage somewhere in northern Scotland. Perhaps the Isle of Skye.

Alternatively, find and use a device that allows me to start again on December 13, 1984 as a newborn child with my current experiences and memories. I'd love to see what sort of prophetic verses I could come up with, not to mention all of the second chances I could have.

 

[Raddragon]

Cleanse this world of evil...the hard way!

 

[Your Mom is Attractive]

i would run amok.

look it up.. the dictionary definition is quite hilarious.

 

[3rd rung]

Rip a whole in time and space destroyiong the universe if it would just go back the way it was with no consequense why not nothing bigger then that, also why not try and do somthing really good change the world in postive way like spend all my money and try to revolutize the world to seee if it would work and if not it would go back to the wya it was, or do it again in the consiquences were in fact good

 

[GRoXERs]

Lots of gene pool cleansing.

It would be great to be able to see the average IQ rising.


Anyway:
Usurp God's throne.

This.

Off-topic: The average IQ wouldn't rise, as IQ is a comparative function, with 100 being defined as average. Kill all the idiots, and the average would still be 100, but a 100 that was about equal to, say, 140 when all the idiots were still alive.

 

[Clashero]

Improve the gene pool.

 

[omicronpercei]

That's easy...Depopulation. There would be no greater day than taking vengeance on the people in this world who ruin being human. Jesse Jackson, George W. ,Al Sharpton, Hillary Clinton, a laundry list of celebrities (Paris Hilton, Woody Allen, Kanye West or any of those self-righteous twats that infest hollywood).

 

[Anarchemitis]

No consequence? I would definitely swim down a volcano and see what's there or I would swim to the bottom of the ocean. I'd love to see what did #1 on this list:

http://www.cracked.com/article_16871_p2.html

That's a great idea, and those are crazy.

 

[Roamin11]

No more preps, I have a shot gun of prep-B-GONE reved up and ready to go.

 

[Yegargeburble]

Kill all humans. Then make a throne out of their skulls. I'd be ruler of the world.

This, but minus the skull throne. I would use femurs to make my throne

 

[Zildjin81]

Create a disease that turns people into zombies and then watch the world squirm.

 

[Erikaiht]

Lots of gene pool cleansing.

It would be great to be able to see the average IQ rising.


Anyway:
Usurp God's throne.

This.

Off-topic: The average IQ wouldn't rise, as IQ is a comparative function, with 100 being defined as average. Kill all the idiots, and the average would still be 100, but a 100 that was about equal to, say, 140 when all the idiots were still alive.

Well, technically yes. However compared to before, it would have risen, just the strength of measurement would be different.

 

[Booze Zombie]

I'd take over the world with an unflinchingly loyal army of cyborgs and advanced mind transfer and cloning technology in the event of my death.

 

[kickin wiing]

Punch my history teacher square in the face.

 

[SquirrelPants]

Have you ever heard of the stick figure series, "Killing Spree"? Yeah, I would do that. I may post a link if I feel like it/can find it.

 

[DrX_1030]

Lots of gene pool cleansing.

i love it, lol but not in the racist type of sence more in the retard kind of way, or in the burden of the state kind of way. like retards that contribute nothing to society exept for more retard children

 

[Rolling Thunder]

If your going tio try and rid the world of scum, have the decency to start with yourselves.

 

[wordsmith]

Lots of gene pool cleansing.

It would be great to be able to see the average IQ rising.


Anyway:
Usurp God's throne.

This.

Off-topic: The average IQ wouldn't rise, as IQ is a comparative function, with 100 being defined as average. Kill all the idiots, and the average would still be 100, but a 100 that was about equal to, say, 140 when all the idiots were still alive.

How can that be right? If you cut the bottom of the range off, the average HAS to rise, as the new lower bound is now where the middle was (I hope that makes sense, it's too early for me to bother with numbered examples.