The majority? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but you're the only one on this thread that I've seen who is pissed off. Everyone else thought it was an excellent review of an excellent game. I hardly think you alone are important enough to be considered the majority of Yahtzee's fanbase.DBlack said:It all makes sence now! The reason your not reviewing any good games is because your trying to piss off the majority of YOUR fan base by not reviewing any of their favorite games. Who the hell wants to know anything about some piss-ant game nobody cares about? I cant even find Amnesia at any E.B. games store!
I don't know where you get that idea. This is, from what I remember, the first indie game he's actually reviewed, and I personally saw that as a nice change of pace. And considering Amnesia came out only three weeks ago, I think it definitely qualifies as `still relevant'.I used to acctualy care what you thought about games but now I've realized you only review games (or dont review certain games) just to get some shock value, in order to attract attention. Even that guy who does Escape to the Movies reviews things while there still relavent. Because what good is a review of a game that nobody has, and no body cares about.
I'm pretty sure he gets enough support that he doesn't give a shit about what his viewers want to see ripped on. I expect he chooses his reviews based on the games he personally wants to play and review. Anyway, he didn't ignore anything, he just postponed Reach for a week. Even if he hadn't, he'd get to it eventually, with people like you shoving it up his ass. I mean, he finally did Brawl out of viewer pressure.So with your poor choices in mind I think you should not review any games that sell over 1 million copies this fall. That way every game that people want you to rip on can get throughly ignored with no favorites.
I think it's interesting how, earlier in your comment, you proclaim that indie games like this one aren't worth reviewing because apparently the fact that nobody knows about them makes them shit, and you'd rather he reviewed a game that you already know is shit, for the sole reason that it's the opposite of an indie game. I think I sense a little hypocrisy there, yes?And yes I'm still upset about how you didnt eat Starcraft 2 alive for being a predictable piece of shit, that only sold because of the name. WHOA Ticus was a trator!? That would have been a supprise if it didnt show it at the begining of the game!
Haha, yeah, I know exactly which room you mean. And that was fucking creepy as hell. If you ever finish Overture, definitely play Black Plague, it's much better, much scarier, and the psychological horror aspect (which isn't present at all in Overture) comes fairly close to rivaling the original Silent Hill games. Which is not something I say flippantly.tthor said:hell, i still haven't finished the game, after being severely creeped out by a certain room...
There's a demo. Go test it.Sovvolf said:Ba'h this computer would probably blow up before running such a game which is a big shame as I've heard from quite a lot of people that it's a recommend. Being a indie developed ga,e, I'm doubting it's going to have a full release on both the consoles and the P.C so I'm missing out on this one it would seem.
You aren't a true fan, as you clearly don't read his articles.Snakepiper said:Wow yay your reviewing Halo: Reach.... didn't you do that like 3 years ago? It was called Halo 3 then, but it's practically the same fucking game since the original Halo. Least you could've fucking did was reviewed SC2 instead of Gaylo: Reach Around.
I just came to say pretty much this same thing. I really hope this review helps with the sales. It's not like Frictional will have to close shop (worst comes to worst they're not really in financial trouble, and they're just too passionate to give up), but it would be really sad if they decided to forfeit horror in favor of a more profitable genre. They're just too f'ing good at this, and there's simply no one that can stand up to them these days. Horror needs them desperately.Mausenheimmer said:Food for thought: Frictional Games is concerned about their financial future based on the sales of this game (check it out: http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2010/09/one-week-after-release-of-amnesia.html). It'll be interesting to see if Yahtzee is able to galvanize his fanbase into saving the game.
1. I love how you're arrogant yet ignorant enough to think that A. nobody cares about this game, and B. it's clearly irrelevant because it's not in a box.DBlack said:It all makes sence now! The reason your not reviewing any good games is because your trying to piss off the majority of YOUR fan base by not reviewing any of their favorite games. Who the hell wants to know anything about some piss-ant game nobody cares about? I cant even find Amnesia at any E.B. games store!
I used to acctualy care what you thought about games but now I've realized you only review games (or dont review certain games) just to get some shock value, in order to attract attention. Even that guy who does Escape to the Movies reviews things while there still relavent. Because what good is a review of a game that nobody has, and no body cares about.
So with your poor choices in mind I think you should not review any games that sell over 1 million copies this fall. That way every game that people want you to rip on can get throughly ignored with no favorites.
And yes I'm still upset about how you didnt eat Starcraft 2 alive for being a predictable piece of shit, that only sold because of the name. WHOA Ticus was a trator!? That would have been a supprise if it didnt show it at the begining of the game!
...FIVE PEOPLE?!?!?!Schadenfreude said:I just came to say pretty much this same thing. I really hope this review helps with the sales. It's not like Frictional will have to close shop (worst comes to worst they're not really in financial trouble, and they're just too passionate to give up), but it would be really sad if they decided to forfeit horror in favor of a more profitable genre. They're just too f'ing good at this, and there's simply no one that can stand up to them these days. Horror needs them desperately.Mausenheimmer said:Food for thought: Frictional Games is concerned about their financial future based on the sales of this game (check it out: http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2010/09/one-week-after-release-of-amnesia.html). It'll be interesting to see if Yahtzee is able to galvanize his fanbase into saving the game.
A couple things that haven't been mentioned yet:
- The entire Amnesia team consisted of five people. I mean, seriously, gaming industry, what the fuck? FIVE PEOPLE! The best horror game since the first Silent Hill has been made by a developing team that could fit comfortably on a couch!
- These guys post quite regularly at their blog (http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/), and they have some really, really interesting ideas on game design.
You've basically got it right, but less is more applies to works and genres outside of horror. In terms of films, the original Alien is a great example, as we see very little of the xenomorph. Likewise, while the original Predator isn't quite as scary, you still don't see a lot of the hulking hunter until the last bit of the movie. I can hunt up more salient examples if you like.yoyo13rom said:Would you mind explaining me the "less is more" mentality?BlueInkAlchemist said:A horror game that doesn't rely on you being disgusted by a clearly-visible monster that's been seen in half a dozen previous iterations? Unpossible.
An actual recommendation from Yahtzee is a rare thing and probably not given lightly. Glad to see he isn't the only one who actually understands the "less is more" mentality. It shows in his writing.
I think it refers to less as in less monsters, and less on screen scares that equal more class psychological horror, but I want to be certain I got it right.
As far as engines, they are different, and Amnesia has more requirements.Dfskelleton said:Can I have some help here? I'm tring to decide if I want Penumbra: Overture or Amnesia. Nto only because I'm wondering which is scarier, but because I'm wondering which one has lower system requirements. I have a really crappy PC, so let me play this out: Portal works, Doom 3 doesn't. The Penumbra tech demo (which I loved) works fine, but i wonder if there's an engine difference. If not, I just need to decide what I feel like. Price is no big deal, 2 dollars difference, whatever, but I'd prefer whichever is scarier. I've longed for a horror game (that I haven't already played, Silent Hill) that truly scares me. Silent Hill freaked me out a bit, while I'm laughing at F.E.A.R, DOOM 3, Dead Space, and Resident Evil 4, saying "Wait, that's supposed to scare me?"(although those games are still good, just not scary.) I've heard Penumbra is really scary, though, but Yahtzees reaction has me split. I need help!
Here. Let me get some examples for you [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NothingIsScarier]. (warning: TVTropes)BlueInkAlchemist said:You've basically got it right, but less is more applies to works and genres outside of horror. In terms of films, the original Alien is a great example, as we see very little of the xenomorph. Likewise, while the original Predator isn't quite as scary, you still don't see a lot of the hulking hunter until the last bit of the movie. I can hunt up more salient examples if you like.
A good game? Hell thats easy! One I can play with my friends. The more the merrier. Playing a game alone can be entertaining, but playing it with others can be way more fun because you not only have the entertainment the game gives but also the BS that come along with a bunch of crazy basturds trying to co-operate.lacktheknack said:1. I love how you're arrogant yet ignorant enough to think that A. nobody cares about this game, and B. it's clearly irrelevant because it's not in a box.DBlack said:It all makes sence now! The reason your not reviewing any good games is because your trying to piss off the majority of YOUR fan base by not reviewing any of their favorite games. Who the hell wants to know anything about some piss-ant game nobody cares about? I cant even find Amnesia at any E.B. games store!
I used to acctualy care what you thought about games but now I've realized you only review games (or dont review certain games) just to get some shock value, in order to attract attention. Even that guy who does Escape to the Movies reviews things while there still relavent. Because what good is a review of a game that nobody has, and no body cares about.
So with your poor choices in mind I think you should not review any games that sell over 1 million copies this fall. That way every game that people want you to rip on can get throughly ignored with no favorites.
And yes I'm still upset about how you didnt eat Starcraft 2 alive for being a predictable piece of shit, that only sold because of the name. WHOA Ticus was a trator!? That would have been a supprise if it didnt show it at the begining of the game!
2. In reference to above, I care about this game. I've been tracking it since April or May.
3. "Not reviewing good games"? He LIKED this one! What more do you want!? "Oh, but I don't like it!" Um, you just said you've never played it, never heard about it, and probably don't know anything about it, thus you don't know if you like it or not.
4. He said he's going to go through Halo Reach, but he's delaying it to "bait fanboys". Reading your response, it doesn't even matter if you like Halo or not, he baited you anyways. And he is satisfied with his catch.
5. He gave us a couple weeks notice that he would NOT review Starcraft because he DOESN'T LIKE RTS games, yet people are surprised. Pay attention.
Out of interest, what do you consider to be "good" games? Considering how he's covered his bases pretty well in the past, I can't help but wonder why you're so butthurt now.