Zero Punctuation: Call of Duty: Black Ops

Recommended Videos

Kurt Horsting

New member
Jul 3, 2008
361
0
0
I think Yahtzee was simply mentioning that the game just lacks pacing. Since everything is just going from one fire fight to the next there isn't a contrast to make it feel dangerous, fast paced, or exhilarating. In COD4 (the one that had the best single player of all of them)you had several sneaky missions including crawling on your belly through hostile territory to assassinate a bad guy, then was a mission where you where a gunner of a AC130 escorting a platoon of soldiers, then there was fire fights in between. Its a good example of contrast of gameplay to make you feel danger for different reasons other then being shot at.

From what it seems (although I haven't played black ops personally) its just random gunfight, to the next random gunfight in a different place. Same thing was wrong with MW2's champaign. It felt all the same cause there wasn't anything too radically different between missions.

At least I know that Marvel vs Capcom 3 will have a retarded story no one will care about, but still be the best game of 2011. So calling it out on that is kinda like calling out a retarded kid for a double dribble, you just gotta let it slide. I am so hyped for this game; liquid hype bursts from my pores!
 

BrownGaijin

New member
Jan 31, 2009
895
0
0
Yesterday North Korea starts talking smack. Today YZ says that we Americans need to go to war.

Hmm...
 

civver

New member
May 15, 2009
128
0
0
With the situation on the Korean Peninsula, that war fantasy may be fulfilled.
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Well Yahtzee, I'm still mad at you for disliking Modern Warfare 2, because it seemed to me like you criticised that story unfairly because it confused you and you had to rush through it to get your review out. But we agree on Black Ops. It had a shitty, disjointed story handwaved by a poorly done interrogation/brainwashing framing device, and it certainly wasn't what I was expecting going in.
From the various trailers I assumed the piloting the Gunship level would be the Crowning Monent of Awesome for the game, coming after a good deal of sneaking around like the SAS "cockney weasels" in COD4.
The pity is some of the stealth sections were pretty cool: like the bit where you snatch the guy from underwater (though I think the throat slitting was a bit unnecessarily graphic), and the pit where... uh. Well that was it really, wasn't it?

The zipline window breach was pretty cool.

But other than that it really was just 6 hours of stuff blowing up. There was no point where I really felt engaged by the story or the characters. Almost everything in this game has been done better in previous games, with the exception of the aforementioned gunship mission and the part where you're spotting for a team on the ground from the Blackbird... which was a monumental anti-climax. You sit through a cutscene much like the doomed astonaut in MW2, climb into a plane, and then play a strategy minigame where you point some troops in a direction.
There's an achievement for guiding them safely, except it tells you what button you need to press to, for example "dig in and hide" about 2 seconds after it would have been useful to do so - which is another in a long line of broken directives the game gives you - late warning on QTEs, misplaced checkpoints, unclear objectives and objective markers.

The poor story is only the terrible icing on this half-baked cake. I frankly preferred World at War to this mess.



Sneaklemming said:

This is only an interactive movie...
Wow, you mean an easy tutorial mission where the allied NPCs do most of the work? Hey, you know how that guy walks forward, takes cover when he gets hit? That's called playing the game.

I dislike Black Ops, but this is the stupidest way to bash something ever. Most games these days ARE interactive movies. What you're forgetting is that shooting, walking, jumping, climbing, grenading, scavenging for ammo and loot, building an empire and blowing up the galaxy are all forms of interaction games allow us to do.

Not firing bullets doesn't count as not playing the game. If he could put the controller down and the game could still justifiably get him to the end of the level and complete the objective without him touching a god damn thing, then you could criticise the game. But this is not the case.
 

Superior Mind

New member
Feb 9, 2009
1,537
0
0
Sneaklemming said:
Wow. That's really quite something. It's hilariously ridiculous.

Why do people wet themselves with excitement for every Call of Duty game? There is nothing to get excited about. Take away the fact that you've seen it all before and it's still bad.

I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade and say that you shouldn't enjoy Call of Duty I'm just wondering why you would.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
When it comes to US bashing I think it's just that other nations don't like the reminders involved, both in a current sense (who is the dominant world power), and of things we did in the past to get there.

Truthfully, I rarely if ever hear any major complaints when someone decides to do a Napoleanic or medieval war game where all of the countries are european because the USA doesn't exist, or isn't powerful enough to be a factor.

That said I think Yahtzee needs to understand the differance between "Espionage" and "Black Ops.". Espionage is when you send in the shadowy spies and do quiet, sneaky stuff. Black Ops. are off the books military operations. One country violating another's national sovreignty to kill people and break things while maintaining denial that you did any such thing.

Typically Black Ops. are conducted in such a way that stuff just gets destroyed and lots of people die, but there is no one around to tell you who did it.... if they go right. If they fail then typically they try and kill themselves, or give false information about who they actually work for.

Black Ops. being conducted during peacetime when one country wants to do something to another country but an overall war is not seen as being appropriate, the primary concern being the reaction of the rest of the world (third party nations).

The "Cold War" was an unusual event with the US and USSR both involved in fighting for position and to curtail each other in various parts of the world, to see who could come out on top. Neither side wanting a direct, all-out war because both sides knew that if it went beyond these kinds of operations and getting position that way, then everyone on both sides would die, and the rest of the world would line up in the Grim Reaper's queue as a result of the crossfire.

I mean I get it, Yahtzee was expecting some kind of spy game, that isn't what this is about.

Typically the spies go in and gather the information so then the black ops. guys can come in and stomp the crud out of everything. That base the spy hero infiltrated, and confirmed that yes there are weapons there? Well the purpose of doing that was not just for after-dinner conversation, it was so it could be destroyed.

Think of it this way as well, how does a country complain about having a secret military base they weren't supposed to have due to treaties or whatever (or which was threatening another country) destroyed? What are they going to say? These guys were more ruthless and underhanded than we were?

Torture during a time of conflict is a hot button issue here, and I'm not going to open that can of worms again. The point being made there was probably that in real war there are no "heroes" or "good guys" despire how the winners spin the propaganda about themselves. Simply put whoever the bigger bastards are, are the ones that win. We did plenty of bad things in World War II as well in order to win, not to mention how decades were spent hunting down Nazi remnants. The Nazi party was not entirely military, and it didn't just go from a huge international movement, lead by an internationally praised man of the year, to a fringe movement due to someone waving a magical wand of conveinence. If you look in the right places you'll find the US and allies left behind their own share of body piles and mass graves.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
Great, now I have the Inspector Gadget theme stuck in my head.

And yes, these constant firefight war FPS's NEED TO FUCKING STOP. They're the bland sludge of the game industry. Even Vanquish had pacing with quieter sections like the sniping section and escort mission. Someone really needs to do a deconstruction of the whole war FPS genre, though that might be above a lot of the games industry
 

alexbaxthedarkside

New member
May 21, 2009
39
0
0
never fear, ass creed brotherhood will be next in line i reckon, I did play the zombie missions in black Ops, and the red dead redemption undead nightmare looks like a lot of laughs. I think these games are supposed to be there to vent our frustrations so we don't incur another war. But i do agree with Yahtzee that that seems to be the only output we are seeing these days.

Love the review Yahtzee. Will always watch your show, always alot of laughs and absolute comic genius ^_^
 

alexbaxthedarkside

New member
May 21, 2009
39
0
0
never fear, ass creed brotherhood will be next in line i reckon, I did play the zombie missions in black Ops, and the red dead redemption undead nightmare looks like a lot of laughs. I think these games are supposed to be there to vent our frustrations so we don't incur another war. But i do agree with Yahtzee that that seems to be the only output we are seeing these days.

Love the review Yahtzee. Will always watch your show, always alot of laughs and absolute comic genius ^_^
 

TheLiham

New member
Apr 15, 2010
477
0
0
Wow, So basically it sucks, and is the same as every other Call of Duty.

Just like I've been saying since about 3 months before it came out!
 

alexbaxthedarkside

New member
May 21, 2009
39
0
0
does seem to be sad the only games that sure fire make a return are war FPS games, will be very sad if it just makes more angry people.


but i gotto say the multi player was pretty invigorating. but really id rather go back to battle tetris ^_^
 

ace_of_something

New member
Sep 19, 2008
5,995
0
0
Yes... these games don't sell eleventeen cocktillion copies world wide. It's just the US buying them...

Also,

Slab Bulkhead
Fridge Largemeat
Punt Speedchunk
Butch Deadlift
Bold Bigflank
Splint Chesthair
Flint Ironstag
Bolt Vanderhuge
Thick McRunfast
Blast Hardcheese
Buff Drinklots
Trunk Slamchest
Fist Rockbone
Stump Beefgnaw
Smash Lampjaw
Punch Rockgroin
Buck Plankchest
Stump Chunkman
Dirk Hardpeck
Rip Steakface
Slate Slabrock
Crud Bonemeal
Brick Hardmeat
Rip Sidecheek
Punch Sideiron
Gristle McThornBody
Slake Fistcrunch
Buff Hardback
Bob Johnson
Blast Thickneck
Crunch Buttsteak
Slab Squatthrust
Lump Beefrock
Touch Rustrod
Reef Blastbody
Big McLargeHuge
Smoke Manmuscle
Beat Punchbeef
Pack Blowfist
Roll Fizzlebeef


Thank you MST3k. There we shouldn't have to reuse hero names for a while.
 

JackRyan64

New member
May 22, 2010
295
0
0
Electrogecko said:
I can't believe I'm reading comments seriously saying we need another world war. For that matter, anybody who thinks that the U.S' obsession with shooting games has anything to do with a desire for a real war or will be quelled by one is stupid. That's like saying everyone should go farm some crops and raise some livestock to get off their obsession with Farmville. The fact is that FPS' are great massive and competetive multiplayer hosts....that's it. Noboby invade us please.
This. I find it funny that Yahtzee made that joke because he's making fun of the stereotype that Americans are nothing but violent, gun-obsessed, right wing conservatives who don't know that the Soviet Union collapsed a long time ago. And here are people agreeing with another world war and therefore are being the EXACT kinds of people Yahtzee is making fun of.
 

Fidelias

New member
Nov 30, 2009
1,406
0
0
snowman6251 said:
I keep telling myself I won't buy the new Call of Duty games but I always do. Its the multiplayer. Its the ultimate skinner box and I can't get enough.

Speaking of multiplayer though, I know its not Yahtzee's thing but I think its a huge improvement over MW2. Everything's been nerfed and the game is much better for it. Everything feels more balanced.
Yeah, multiplayer does rule in Black Ops, but it's still not worth 60 bucks. Fortunately, I actually found the single-player kind of fun, so it's worth it to me.
 

LeafofStone

New member
Nov 19, 2009
78
0
0
To be perfectly honest, i feel as though yahtzee was being very mellow with this game (with the exception of the fan girl metaphor). I mean i played Black Ops at a friends house, beat in in one day, and the campaign not only didn't make sense, it cut out every 5 seconds for another explosion or cut scene of other varieties. the whole cutscene thing mightnt have been so bad if you could make scene of what was going on but you just cant (and dont tell me im slow with plots cos i got all of inception on my first view).
 

supermariner

New member
Aug 27, 2010
808
0
0
that first minute or so about the america/virgin metaphor was a refreshing return to form
it may have been more crappy toilet humour which he's been doing since day one
but for some reason it suddenly became very funny again
whatever he's doing he's doing right