I don't remember what review exactly, but I remember that Yahtzee is of the mindset that believes that a game must be able to stand on single player alone. Multiplayer is a side item, so he tends not to review such things in detail if at all.Extragorey said:Multiplayer? I'd have thought he'd at least say SOMETHING about it.
Science is daft in that regard. I've nearly lost consciousness more times than I could remember laughing too hard at something. Would be a great way to go though.XDravond said:Step 1 remember do not watch ZP in a public place... done. Oh wait why is everyone looking at me funny... step 2 forget that...
This was just great comparison laughed way to loud to often, and people think I'm weird duuuh...
I think he points out the really weak points here like invading Europe whole at once... ok that is going to be difficult, not that I expect a shooter to have realistic story....
And his right nobody wins...
Yay, for tuesday invasion...
O well, thank you yathzee for a longer life (laugh does prolong life according to science..)
YES! Stick with BO. Modern Warfare 3's MP is horrible. Maps are small even for COD standarts and akimbo weapons instantly kill people,have no recoil and have sniper like accuracy.Akimbo weapons are actully making MW3 unplayable, as soon as someone decides to have two SMG's you can just quit the game. Theres no point of playing anymore since that bastard can instantly kill you from any distance without even needing to aim. Stick to Black ops,COD 2 or 4. Best CODs imho.Sven_Untgaarde said:From what I've heard, MW3 is not very good in regards to multi-player.
Some also say that Black Ops, as "terrible" as everyone said it to be, was better in terms of multi-player.
I dunno. I liked Black Ops multiplayer, but hated the singleplayer. Should I just stick with what I've got?
Now I think that is a little harsh... I mean its a reskin of MW2. Its not bad. Its Call of Duty. As much as folks hate to say it or admit it... CoD is the staple of the first person shooter till something comes along and knocks it off of its high horse.ShAdDiX69 said:YES! Stick with BO. Modern Warfare 3's MP is horrible. Maps are small even for COD standarts and akimbo weapons instantly kill people,have no recoil and have sniper like accuracy.Akimbo weapons are actully making MW3 unplayable, as soon as someone decides to have two SMG's you can just quit the game. Theres no point of playing anymore since that bastard can instantly kill you from any distance without even needing to aim. Stick to Black ops,COD 2 or 4. Best CODs imho.Sven_Untgaarde said:From what I've heard, MW3 is not very good in regards to multi-player.
Some also say that Black Ops, as "terrible" as everyone said it to be, was better in terms of multi-player.
I dunno. I liked Black Ops multiplayer, but hated the singleplayer. Should I just stick with what I've got?
Depends if they patch MW3. Right now, there are obviously overpowered guns (Type 95 usually kills in one birst) and the spawning is quite simply the worst I have ever seen. People spawn behind you so often and there is almost always an enemy right around the corner from where you respawn.Sven_Untgaarde said:From what I've heard, MW3 is not very good in regards to multi-player.
Some also say that Black Ops, as "terrible" as everyone said it to be, was better in terms of multi-player.
I dunno. I liked Black Ops multiplayer, but hated the singleplayer. Should I just stick with what I've got?
What those games are incredibly similar and are definately the same genremjc0961 said:Yeah, thanks for reminding me of that horrible Prototype VS inFamous review where two games that are completely different from each other were compared. When are you going to put Final Fantasy and Gran Turismo against each other, or maybe Super Mario 3D Land and Skyrim should go head to head?
Or maybe we can stop comparing games from completely different genres to each other, hmm?