Zachary Amaranth said:
It's also worth noting that it wasn't so much the issue as the fact that they were sure they'd sell over four million at Christmas and put them on expensive carts. Which, in fairness, Yahtzee does mention. But this is more the cause of the crash. Overspeculation on games like ET and Pac Man led to retailers having shelves full of unsold carts. It wasn't just a financial burden to the publisher, but also to the retailers. Faced with those full shelves, the retailers said "Whelp, that fad's over! What new toy can we find to replace it?"
Of course, this arguably couldn't have happened without a big name tied to it.
Well, that's a good perspective to bring up: video games were just "toys" back then.
As such, there wasn't really much of a critical press or consumer informant. They weren't taken seriously, and this fostered a dangerous relationship between producer and consumer.
Quality control was done entirely on a trust based system, and with the lack of licensing on Atari's part there was no reason to not go with the shovelware route and gouge like a ************. Grab a license, spend a pittance on development, sell for megabucks. Repeat. It's not like anyone could know the quality of content until they played it.
So consumer trust was betrayed time after time, priming the market to go over the edge.
And then Atari grossly over-committed on E.T., and rightly fell.
Anyway, I still enjoyed the episode, so I'm not knocking Yahtzee. Just engaging in some fact-based information in the comments section because it came up.
Agreed. It's nice to see something other than the usual industry myths trotted out.
Saying that E.T.
Ed130 The Vanguard said:
'Did it cause the crash of the entire Western videogames industry?'
ET and to a lesser extent Pac Man for the Atari 2600 were major contributors to the crash, Custer's Revenge was merely a symptom and not as high profile as the two Atari titles.
And like I've already said, E.T. was not the only contributor.
An entire industry doesn't collapse over one bad product. A systematic failure is required for that to happen.