So I watch all your videos. I think your sense of humour and insights are downright brilliant. I've been hooked on this game, so I was excited to see your take on it. The review fucking sucked, or lack of a review that is. In fact I had to register just to ***** about it and I never register for anything.
This game lazily recycled 75% of its code from Fallout 3 and somehow is 500% buggier. However, people can't stop playing it. At first I was incredibly disappointed, but then started to see how much better everything was laid out. The plot, the humour, the sub-quests, the back stories are all richer and make the game far more entertaining. You failed to comment on any of these things and wasted my fucking time with Glen Miller and your step by step description of what you decided to do in the game.
Just admit that you didn't have nearly enough time to even scrape the surface of this game and threw this review like a comic throws a set because he doesn't like the audience. Meanwhile, despite your laziness this time round, your patriotic followers praise the review just because it's different than your usual style...which is actually reviewing the game.
Maybe the karma doesn't make a difference, but you failed to mention the introduction of "reputation" with the different factions. This is the closest I've seen to a choice-based game actually having a somewhat realistic impact on the the outcome of the story.
Anyway, I thought you might actually have some interesting and funny things to say about this monumental game and you half assed it like you got hammered the night before and then threw it together at the last minute.
You know I'm right.
This game lazily recycled 75% of its code from Fallout 3 and somehow is 500% buggier. However, people can't stop playing it. At first I was incredibly disappointed, but then started to see how much better everything was laid out. The plot, the humour, the sub-quests, the back stories are all richer and make the game far more entertaining. You failed to comment on any of these things and wasted my fucking time with Glen Miller and your step by step description of what you decided to do in the game.
Just admit that you didn't have nearly enough time to even scrape the surface of this game and threw this review like a comic throws a set because he doesn't like the audience. Meanwhile, despite your laziness this time round, your patriotic followers praise the review just because it's different than your usual style...which is actually reviewing the game.
Maybe the karma doesn't make a difference, but you failed to mention the introduction of "reputation" with the different factions. This is the closest I've seen to a choice-based game actually having a somewhat realistic impact on the the outcome of the story.
Anyway, I thought you might actually have some interesting and funny things to say about this monumental game and you half assed it like you got hammered the night before and then threw it together at the last minute.
You know I'm right.
