Its funny, how looking through every post, that so many more posts were defending/attacking Killzone 2 rather than discussing the review he posted...whatever, we'll roll with it. And just out of curiosity, how come goodwins law hasn't been mentioned in this thread yet?
oh, and to mazty, the whole point of a demo is to give an idea of what a game will be like, im not sure what you think they are for, but treblaine does have the right idea of how to look at a demo. At the same time, however, mazty would apear to be right about the grenade launcher attached to weaponry, as this is a game, not real life, and as such in order to be bought, which is any developers objective, it must be fun. This, however, could again be countered by the fact that KZ2 appears to want to be a realistic shooter, and that there was a gun that had a grenade launcher in the first killzone...and so on until yahtzee outrages them with something else and they feel the need to start up another long argument between other people.
but of course, since this post is TL;DR, these two people will either ignore me, or unite against me but for the fact that virtually no one will read their long synopsis, and none will be influenced in the slightest, I think I can safely ignore their pairing-up.
To end on a completly unrelated note, I thought vantage point was brilliant all the way through, although mazty thinks otherwise and treblaine hasn't posted his opinion yet.