I liked the Mako too! In fact, to this day, I still can't understand what everyone was whining about. It's not any harder to control than any other vehicle in any other game that doesn't have a huge emphasis on driving. And there was only one planet where the terrain was so messed up that it was a pain to actually drive the Mako to where you needed to go, and that's not really the Mako's fault.
And then they took it away in the second game and just shuttled you everywhere. Boo! And when people complained, they gave us the Hammerhead. That thing was ass, but at least it was something. At least we'll get to use it more in Mass Effect 3 and have more actual planet exploring sections like the first game, right?
Nope, they took it away again. Really BioWare? Really? And the excuse is that it was away being retrofitted to get more armor and probably got blown up in the Reaper attack? Okay, fine, but surely you could have had us pick up a different vehicle somewhere. Instead we get this annoying scan from the Normandy where you push the left trigger one time and before you even have a chance to push it a second time, a million Reapers spawn to try and rape you. Lovely.
Oh, and then they tease you at the final mission by having tons of Makos everywhere. I want to drive one, why won't you let me drive one game?!
Oh yeah, and I can't forget about how you HAVE to play the awful, terrible, dreadful, shitty multiplayer if you want the super best ending which contains an extra 9 second cutscene! Hurray! And that the MP doesn't let you purchase the upgrades you want, but instead makes you buy these stupid packs that give you things randomly and gives you tons of junk you don't need. Then they have the nerve to ask for REAL MONEY to buy these stupid things, so in your desperation to get something good so you won't have to take on Banshees with a water pistol anymore, you can spend real money to get lots of packs very quickly and still get no useful upgrades. I blame EA for this one, as this reeks of their money grubbing. And this is why Valve doesn't want your games on Steam like this EA, and I for one fully support Valve on this. It's nonsense. Stop trying to milk us dry wherever you can. Any good multiplayer would let you spend your in-game credits to buy the upgrades you need for your class, but you forced Mass Effect 3's MP to be even shittier just so you can get people to spend more real money. How do people actually think that EA aren't the Satan of the game's industry anymore? Those people must be blind.
By this point it probably sounds like I hate this game. Not really. I really like it for the most part. I just needed to rant about a few things.
RedFeather1975 said:
No mention of Marauder Shields?!
Marauder Shields is easily the worst meme ever conceived. I'd rather hear about how Mass Effect 3 had a good ending but then it took an arrow to the knee than hear any more crap about "Marauder Shields".
teh_Canape said:
not really, the multiplayer is just an "alternative"
the war assets room has two meters exactly for that
war assets that you collect in the game and galactic readiness for your multiplayer stats basically do the same
so yeah, it's not necessary to play the MP, but it helps
And this is a post from someone who either hasn't played the game and doesn't actually know what they're talking about, or doesn't understand that leaving your galactic readiness at 50% halves your military strength which blocks you out from having enough EMS to get the "best" ending. Unless maybe the Day 1 DLC adds enough assets to get it up there regardless, but with no DLC, you NEED to play some multiplayer (or use one of those iThing apps) to get your readiness higher than 50% so your EMS goes higher.