leet_x1337 said:Bad Company 2, Dead Space 3, ME2 and 3, uhh...PunkRex said:what have EA released again that wasn't complete doodie?
Why am I defending EA?
leet_x1337 said:Bad Company 2, Dead Space 3, ME2 and 3, uhh...PunkRex said:what have EA released again that wasn't complete doodie?
Why am I defending EA?
1) Yeah, except these kind of games and their fanbase are far mor interested in either a gun show with top of the range military hardware, or simply in it for the ride. I thought COD was going to be kind of like Spec Ops: The Line, until MW2 came along.Markunator said:"Paranoid American power fantasy"? Sorry, I just don't agree. Portraying a war through the eyes of Americans while portraying the Americans positively is not the same as a power fantasy.
Also, taking military action to stop Osama bin Laden was definitely justified, it's just the way it was handled as well as the war in Iraq which were questionable.
The bottom line is, I'm not down with the idea of throwing away the entire concept of military shooters just because there's been too many of them trying to copy Call of Duty. There is potential for good storytelling and gameplay within the context of modern war, and I think that potential is too good to squander. Just wait until ArmA III comes out - that isn't going to be a Call of Duty clone.
The problem is he doesn't play multiplayer. Which is what those spark gunkle wee wee games focus on. I would hate all modern shooter if I only played the single player as well because FFS they are all hopelessly boring and identical.Yopaz said:It's funny how people accuse him of not liking shooter when some of the games he give the most praise (Half-Life and Painkiller) are shooters.
I'm going to accuse him of not liking survival horror games for the bad review he gave Resident Evil 5.
I guess none of the titles he reviewed seems appealing to me. I guess I like modern shooters a tad more than he does, but only because he really, really hates them. Hilarious as always though.
Warfighter is a generic term applying to soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen, etc. Don't call a marine a soldier unless you want to piss them off, and vice versa. It's a slightly more professional word than "troops" and shorter than writing all of the above. It's more that the title is using a somewhat obscure term than anything.Farther than stars said:I'm pretty sure we have a word for 'warfighter'. They're called soldiers. -.-
I resent that remark! I am by no means an above-average gamer; I am in fact quite below average, borderline terrible.blackrave said:The very fact you are on this website means you are above average gamer
I'm actually all for US intervention abroad, but that moment with the robot (as described) still creeped me out. If you're going to do something like that, you'd better do a good job of establishing the bad guys as a) obviously evil b) morally neutral but regrettably in the way of obviously evil people c) not deserving of human rights (e.g. zombies). While applying movie logic to real life is stupid, Warfighter is a video game that has to play by dramatic rules.Lonewolfm16 said:Yahtzee has repeatedly said that having better tech makes killing people wrong... I don't get it, seriously how does being the superior fighters mean that everything you do is morally terrible? Have we switched to a movie based system of morality where the scrappy under-dogds are always the good guys and the rich, skilled, constantly winning sports team is invariably evil?