I think microsoft wanted to have more focus on the additional features of the console because they thought "we're making a games console, of course it's going to have games!". Only it wasn't all that clear, since the other companies brought up their machines with useless gimmicky stuff most people don't need and therefore wont shell out money for it. Except for the useless gimmicky bullshit, i haven't seen anything that couldn't be done on the old consoles (albeit maybe in slightly lower texture resolution).
If my skyrim runs smoothly but stutters a bit when i download a new high resolution texture pack, would i run to the store to buy new parts for my computer to make it run faster for 500$? I highly doubt it.
Especially if those new parts came with annoying restrictions.
I do not care about social media connectivity, but companies would have me pay for the implementation of those things. Fair enough, i'll buy a ps4 controller and measure the "share" button. I will then make a plastic cap to fit over it and probably make a billion bucks.
Nintendo are masters of innovative controls that no one really wants. The wii mote might be fun for a while, but how many Wii's are gathering dust in your closets and attics?
The thing doesn't work reliably and if a can't have a "realistic" swordfight without having the most success by having a seizure i might as well not bother.
Three years after release they brought out the "wii mote+". It works better, still not as reliable as a button but it's something. After three years.
Might as well wait three years before i decide if i want to buy a new console.
All in all, i find this guide not cynical at all. I honestly couldn't recommend any of those new consoles to anyone.