Zero Punctuation: Ryse: Son of Rome

Recommended Videos

IrisNetwork

New member
Sep 11, 2013
106
0
0
But Yahtzee, the environments are pretty! 10/10 LOL

The beginning of the video is pretty much what Jim Sterling has been on about. Consoles now are just shit PCs. Sure there are exclusives but besides that, all the plus points go to the PC.

So, QTEs are just "Press X if you want to" now? Not even "Press X to not die"? You can't fail in this game?
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
EyeReaper said:
I want to play a game about Roman soldiers fighting shark people on the planet outlandish. That sounds at least 5-10x better than this piece of drivel. While we're at it, lets make them Shark Nazis. because goddamn, could there be anything more evil or horrifying than an alien shark nazi?
Oh my god! Prof. Farnsworth's experiments with Hitler's Brain were a success!
Rangerboy87 said:
Ulquiorra4sama said:
Adept Mechanicus said:
Can anyone translate the Latin in the credits?
1. In wine there's truth
2. Slander boldly, something always sticks
3. As you are, I was; as I am so you shall also be.

Not sure about the first two, but the last one is a Silent Hill reference so far as I remember.
The first is a Doc Holliday quote I think, the second is by Francis Bacon, the third I believe has to do with death being inevitable (which would make sense for Silent Hill)
That first one's posted in a lot of wine-tasting rooms in California Wine country.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Evonisia said:
He does suffer from Australian download speeds. In England for example all three games I've downloaded only took 5 minutes to do in general.
He's copying from the disc though, isn't he? Not downloading?
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I think my biggest thing with this game is that when you get damaged your screen flashes white. it just makes it all a distraction it seems.
 

Veylon

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,626
0
0
If they wanted someone to fight, they could always have gone with usurpers in various locales. They'd ship you out to Bulgaria to take on Regalianus, who has declared himself Emperor. Then you'd kill him and bring back his head, only to find out that Ingenuus is kicking up trouble in Croatia and Postumus is doing the same in France with both of them declaring themselves Emperors. So you'd go kill them and bring back their heads, only to find out that now there's four guys playing Emperor all the same time in Eastern Mediterranean....

Well, okay, maybe that'd get kind of repetitive, but the Romans had succession crises and usurpations like crazy.
 

Reddington

New member
Jul 14, 2013
1
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
This is gaming i expect from a few gens ago, not on next gen. No real excuse for it.
People see the awesome graphics and assume the developer put the same effort into the rest of the game. This being in spite of the number of games we've already seen with breathtaking graphics and mediocre gameplay.

The excuse is that these types of games sell despite numerous releases in the past that have awesome graphics and mediocre gameplay. This will continue until people stop supporting this type of development, until that day you can be sure we'll be seeing more games like this.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
Rainbow_Dashtruction said:
No, ONLY Sydney has that fast internet in Australia. Every other major city (except the Gold Coast :( ) has faster then most of the other cities, but no where near 100mb/s.
Fair enough, I've only ever lived in Sydney, though I do recall hearing Canberra got the NBN first for obvious reasons. Either way my point about Abbott being a twit stands.
 

jackpipsam

SEGA fanboy
Jun 2, 2009
830
0
0
I have enjoyed the game myself.

Then again I have decided to play it in one hour chunks.
It's not terrible I can say, it's decent for that it is.
 

CaptainThom

New member
Jun 24, 2013
55
0
0
rcs619 said:
I haven't really been keeping up with this game, but... really? Barbarians? They make a game about the Roman Empire, one of the largest, most militarily powerful nations in the ancient world, and the only people they can think up for enemies are Barbarians? Granted, there were some big fights with Barbarians, but in general they were never a real threat to Rome until the very end when it been substantially weakened. Did they just not read the parts about how absolutely crushing the Roman legions were for much of Rome's history?

If they really wanted an 'epic' war story, why not set it during the Punic wars? Carthage was actually one of the few real military threats Rome ever faced. And the bulk of the Carthaginian military was made of mercenaries from all over Africa and the Mediterranean, which gives you quite a large variety of enemy types to choose from for your badguys. Also, Carthage actually had, and used, war elephants. Since any game about Rome has to have them.
The so called barbarians beat the Romans many times throughout its history heck in the early years Rome was sacked by Gaulish tribes. Therefore I wouldn't suggest that the Barbarians were not a threat to the Romans, the only reason Caesar was allowed to conquer Gaul was because Rome feared Barbarian tribes might move into Italy. You may want to look at battles like Teutoburg Forest that show that the legions were far from invincible.

That said i do agree that had the story revolved around the Punic wars it would have been far more engaging, why make up false history when the real think is much better. Although i doubt how well the elephants would have been implemented into a hack and slash game.
 

JenSeven

Crazy person! Avoid!
Oct 19, 2010
695
0
0
I guess we can change the slogan for this game to:
"Veni, Vidi, Faeces!"
 

snekadid

Lord of the Salt
Mar 29, 2012
711
0
0
So, what yahtzee is saying is that Ryse was the first case of truth in advertising in a long time, because the trailer made the game look just as lame.
 

MrBaskerville

New member
Mar 15, 2011
871
0
0
I never got the graphics in this game, apparently they are impressive, but from what i´ve seen it all looks rather awful. A whole lot of boring grey and brown with gritty and ugly character models with strange faces. It just looks very unappealing in every thinkable way and the gameplay looks rather awful and boring.

But what can you expect from a game that started its life as a kinect exclusive?
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,649
0
0
MonkeyPunch said:
Steve the Pocket said:
MonkeyPunch said:
I also remember reading that Crytek were thinking of taking out the QTEs... yet they didn't. They just replaced the button prompts with colour prompts. tsk tsk
From what I've heard, the game was originally nothing but QTEs, and when people complained, they reduced it to just the finishing moves.
That's my point though. They are still QTEs just that instead of button icons they make the character flash the colour of the button you're meant to press instead. I don't think the mechanics were changed at all, or much from the early showings. They just took out the button prompt icons so that it looks less QTE-ish but in essence it's still the same - the mechanics are still there, if you know what I mean.
No, I mean the core combat, which is currently hack-and-slash meets Arkham Asylum with Call of Duty style setpieces thrown in, weren't originally there at all; that was all QTEs as well, somehow. Again, just going by what I've heard, and I have no idea how that would have worked if it was originally envisioned as a showcase for Kinect's features, so I could be way off.
 

deacon

New member
Dec 5, 2013
1
0
0
so basically instead of playing it for yourselves, the bulk of you opt to line up and join whatever the other guy is saying? lol sounds about right for this generation of gamers.

the game isn't close to being the worst launch game out there nor is the combat. unless you think Assassin's Creed 4 and a variety of other games all have repetitive gameplay that takes away from the experience because guess what .. nearly ALL games run you through the same function repeatedly.

how about this concept .. try the game and see if you agree with what this guy is saying. i've read hundreds of favorable opinions to contrast the uninformed rants people throw at this game.

it's not the greatest .. but it's not the worst either. it's a very good launch game .. one that you won't find many that look as good as .. the gameplay won't be for everyone but it's not unlike many others in its genre.

like i said, try it before you decide to bandwagon and have someone form your opinion for you.
 

tzimize

New member
Mar 1, 2010
2,391
0
0
DeadCoyote said:
Now they can with no shame put on their box this quote:

"10\10"
Zero Punctuation
Hah! True :p

Oh man, Mr. Croshaw....I really pity you for your job sometimes. The reason your videos are so hilarious is because I picture you suffering through this garbage, just to make a video for us. Thanks ^^
 

Knytes

New member
Dec 5, 2013
2
0
0
Reddington said:
SonOfVoorhees said:
This is gaming i expect from a few gens ago, not on next gen. No real excuse for it.
People see the awesome graphics and assume the developer put the same effort into the rest of the game. This being in spite of the number of games we've already seen with breathtaking graphics and mediocre gameplay.

The excuse is that these types of games sell despite numerous releases in the past that have awesome graphics and mediocre gameplay. This will continue until people stop supporting this type of development, until that day you can be sure we'll be seeing more games like this.
Actually...well, you better just adapt, cuz this is and will be the current trend for any game with "action" in the title. Talking about an action game of any sorts in this day and age having any type of decent plot/storyline is tantamount to talking about a normal person who lost the bronze in the special olympics because he saw a shiny nickel.

The only genre's that are pretty much guaranteed to have some semblance of a story, whether or not it is palatable, are sci-fi, adventure, and rpg's. And those genre's have been slowly shrinking, or are being blended into the action category, for nearly a decade. So either go into, or start, an indy game group, or just chalk it up to an emerging fact of life and go get your good stories from a book(s).

deacon said:
so basically instead of playing it for yourselves, the bulk of you opt to line up and join whatever the other guy is saying? lol sounds about right for this generation of gamers.

the game isn't close to being the worst launch game out there nor is the combat. unless you think Assassin's Creed 4 and a variety of other games all have repetitive gameplay that takes away from the experience because guess what .. nearly ALL games run you through the same function repeatedly.

how about this concept .. try the game and see if you agree with what this guy is saying. i've read hundreds of favorable opinions to contrast the uninformed rants people throw at this game.

it's not the greatest .. but it's not the worst either. it's a very good launch game .. one that you won't find many that look as good as .. the gameplay won't be for everyone but it's not unlike many others in its genre.

like i said, try it before you decide to bandwagon and have someone form your opinion for you.
"Try the game and see if you agree"? By that logic, every time I open up a Game Informer I should go out and buy every game they review and try it for my own opinion...or how about this: Go fuck yourself. I'm glad your daddy and mommy have the money to buy you whatever your little pre-pubescent heart desires, but for the majority of us that is not option as we work for a living, and have bills to pay.

Game reviewers exist, and receive a paycheck (or most of them do), for a reason. Their opinions, and yes we know it is an opinion, help us gamers to decide whether or not a game sparks our varied interests (and/or looks like fun) before we go out and spend our hard earned money on it. Granted, a lot of game companies probably do not care for this as it allows us to exercise a little thing called purchasing power, but hey! A free market is dandy ain't it?

So continuing on your path of genius, game reviewers shouldn't exist. Riiiight...First off, this is Yahtzee we're talking about. He is a cynic, sarcastic bastard, and that's why we love him. But you have to take 90% of his reviews with a grain of salt. If you go through all his reviews, you can probably count the number of games he has given a thumbs up to on one hand. I know for damn sure you won't be needing to take off your shoes to count your toes. However some of the games he has stomped into a prostitute's crabby cavern I have personally enjoyed, both the story as well as the game mechanics.
Yahtzee is funny, and he does speak some truths that a lot of us have realized or are beginning to, but there are multiple reviews for the same game out there so go read something. I know that's a shocking revelation for you, even though most of us learned that fact, and nearly everything mentioned in this wall of text, by the time we were ten-frikkin'-years-old.

Yahtzee...funny, as usual. Although, as the barbarians were also burly white men, at least in Central and Western Europe, and had hounded the Roman Empire multiple times and even sacked the city of Rome on occasion, I don't think they had logistics issues. Think of it like this, a crossbow bolt...that is a inch thick wooden dowel with a metal point...could pierce roman (and even some medieval) plate armor. Who knew a stick can be such a wonderful tool, right?