Zero Punctuation: Saints Row: The Third

Recommended Videos

leviadragon99

New member
Jun 17, 2010
1,055
0
0
Mmm, Angry Joe had pretty much the same position, though it seems he and Yahtzee are in the minority on this one among critics.
 

DataSnake

New member
Aug 5, 2009
467
0
0
There's a bowler hat available...as part of an on-disc DLC pack. I WISH I was kidding.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
I honestly feel that the 2 games are equivelent, SR3 does have some features that dont work as well as they did in SR2 but is also has a lot of new stuff that does work. One thing that I see in a lot of reviews is that people just talk about the stuff that SR2 had that SR3 doesnt and they skip the new stuff entirely.

I liked that they did something diferent, like when they made SR2 I liked that they made something diferent after SR1. For me this is what a sequel should be, its kind of the same without being the same.

Prof. Monkeypox said:
Ha! Nice little callback at the end.

Anyway, yeah, something I noticed about SR3 (without even playing it, mind) was that it was trying to hard to be "wacky."

If the very first shop you enter lets you buy a nine-foot dildo (along more conventional weapons, mind) then they're basically just giving you things they find hilarious, not letting you find your own hilarity.

Ideally "the penetrator" should be a hard-to-find weapon in a fetish shop that needs to be hunted down.

It should be like a Dead Rising thing:
"Hum de dum, oh a new store, let me check it out."
"Oh, I can buy leather gear, that's kind of funny I guess, maybe I'll buy a..."
"what's that in the corner, it looks like a dildo but..."
"what, I can pick it up? Swing it around"
"Ha! What will it do to this pedestrian! OMG this is awesome!"


It's a lot less funny when they just hand it to you at the start.
This is what I mean, this guy didnt played the game and because of the reviews (most of them, this has nothing to do with ZP now) he thinks that everything is given to the player right at the start, its not. There are a lot of rewards, like:

They arent exactly spoiler material but if you want to be suprised when you unlock it maybe you shouldnt open this
Playing as a toilet

Futuristic guns

These are just 2 of many more
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
So who else saw this one coming?

Yeah, there was no way he was ever going to give it as good a review as he gave the first one. Because as always people seem to have gotten the wrong end of the stick. He wasn't praising SR2 for being wacky, he was praising it for being wackier than Grand Theft Auto. When the third game is just wacky it loses the context in which he made the first review.

Ah well, I'll probably get it anyway, because I like my games wacky every once in a while, but that is really depressing to hear about the clothing options. That was practically the only reason I bought SR2.

Also, is it just me or has Yahtzee given three positive reviews practically in a row?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Zombine3D said:
sr1~sr3 . and the devs said that sr4 will be whackyer than sr3... of course after 40 weeks worth of dlc...
I can't wait. Dual wielding dildos.

Dual wielding EXPLOSIVE dildos.

Dual Wielding EXPLOSIVE FLAMING dildos while defecating on the Mona Lisa and screwing the enemy boss' mum.

LOOK AT US! WE'RE CRAAAAAZAY!
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
So let me get this straight:

Extra Punctuation: Skyrim - "Goddammit there are too many options for character customization!"

Zero Punctuation: Saints Row: The Third - "Goddammit there aren't enough options with the clothes!"

It looks a little odd to complain about there being less options when a few days earlier (or later, depending on when the video was made) you went on about how there's "almost too many options" somewhere else.
 

Shadow-Phoenix

New member
Mar 22, 2010
2,289
0
0
999realthings said:
I'm glad Yazthee wasn't affected at all by his hype for the game. I can't udnerstand why every crictic is rating this game higher than SR2 when it's stripped a lot of the element from the 2nd.
Don't forget that another game got a lot hype and scores compared to SR3.

OT I did enjoy most of what was to offer from SR3 but would also look forward to the next SR if it had a little less "whacky" involved.
 

Stabby Joe

New member
Jul 30, 2008
1,545
0
0
Wow, this really seems like a step down. The Saints Row 2 review was probably the first (if not only) Yahtzee review that actually got me to go out and play it.

While I can't say anything concrete about The Third, it did strike me as "trying too hard" in the previews. I don't know, I wil still probably get around to it at some point...

...so...many...games!
 

Xman490

Doctorate in Danger
May 29, 2010
1,186
0
0
The story does have some sort of progression, just not "rags to riches". It's more about getting more and more powerful so that you can show the unruly Syndicate boss who's really "like a boss" by running through the final mission with bullet-proof skin and your choice of "death to all who oppose me" or "we the people of 'totally isn't New York'".
 

Freaky Lou

New member
Nov 1, 2011
606
0
0
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
The Problem with SR3 is they tried to reinvent the wheel, when SR2 had a perfectly good thing going. Had they merely expanded on that this game would have turned out much better.
What? From everything I've heard, there's not really anything new in this installment, just way more emphasis on the crazy parts.
 

Freaky Lou

New member
Nov 1, 2011
606
0
0
Vegosiux said:
So let me get this straight:

Extra Punctuation: Skyrim - "Goddammit there are too many options for character customization!"

Zero Punctuation: Saints Row: The Third - "Goddammit there aren't enough options with the clothes!"

It looks a little odd to complain about there being less options when a few days earlier (or later, depending on when the video was made) you went on about how there's "almost too many options" somewhere else.
Well, he did explain that in a game like Saints Row, where you'll be looking at your character in cutscenes and during general gameplay, having characters that looks just how you want them to is important. But he felt that in a game like Skyrim, where you'll be spending most of your time in first-person anyway and absolutely none of it in cutscenes, it really doesn't matter that much.

Personally I love the character customization in TES games so I don't agree anyway, but that's what he's saying.
 

Mrsoupcup

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,487
0
0
Freaky Lou said:
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
The Problem with SR3 is they tried to reinvent the wheel, when SR2 had a perfectly good thing going. Had they merely expanded on that this game would have turned out much better.
What? From everything I've heard, there's not really anything new in this installment, just way more emphasis on the crazy parts.
It's hard to explain, but thats how I felt after playing both back to back.
 

LazyAza

New member
May 28, 2008
716
0
0
Yeah 3 definitely feels like it was lacking in content and modes compared to 2 but I still enjoyed it alot and unlike 2 I actually finished the story and 100%ed the game so eh.

The rest of yahtzees complaints though seem really odd based on his usual comments about games. I figured the non stop wackiness would have been right up his alley but I guess not.
 

The Brian J

New member
Apr 18, 2009
177
0
0
100% agree with Yahtzee here. While SR3 is still very fun, it is missing "da magicz" that SR2 had.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
trollpwner said:
Unfortunately, they were beaten by a gun that shoot shurukiens and lightening. So, yeah.
Maybe they will actually come out with a Shuriken/Lightning gun that has tits and is on fire.

And the tits will have that really ridiculous jiggle physics where turning a quarter of a degree rocks them like an earthquake.
 

Zero Serenity

New member
Nov 21, 2009
120
0
0
Did anyone have some strange problem with the video feed when it would turn half yellow and with some blurry textures or was that just me?

(Most sandbox games aren't for me, but the reviews can be facinating.)