Funny thing though. Reading through the article, it mentions not once was the girl shown engaging in sexual acts. It uses weasel words like: 'explicit nude pictures' 'sexually suggestive poses'. And like a lot of people, and even in this thread we take that to mean the worst.
On the one-hand, people have somewhat rightly noted that, one really shouldn't be distributing photos of themselves in this way, especially if you're underage. Moreso because there are people out there who will take advantage of this. But at the same time, seem to be propagating the idea that nudity is criminal, that, beyond when you're born, or when you're in the shower, that being unclothed is one of the worst things you can be.
And any depiction, whether through a drawing, a photo, a video is also morally reprehensible. And make shallow implications that anyone who does must therefore must have a low opinion of themselves. Which I find oddly laughable, since they're not the one's condemning their own naked bodies as something perverted.