$2.50 Reviews: Aliens (1986)

Recommended Videos

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.306788-2-50-Reviews-Alien-1979>AlienNext Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.307207-2-50-Reviews-Alien-3-1992>Alien 3
$2.50 Reviews:
Aliens
http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/poster63.jpg

Aliens is a sequel to Alien in only a few ways. First, both films contain the same alien species. Second, the character of Ripley is in both films, after she was the sole human survivor (along with her cat) from the first film. And third, the set-up is similar, where a group of people end up being trapped in an area with the aliens from the title looking to kill them. Other areas like the tone and genre are very different.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="199" Caption="Still no alien picture." Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/aliens11.jpg[/Img_Inline]

Aliens begins right where Alienleft off. Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) is awakened by a group of salvagers who find her adrift in the middle of nowhere. She's been asleep for 57 years, they tell her, and she is asked to recount the events that happened from the first film. They don't believe her, and tell her that she's wasted millions of company dollars by blowing up her ship. She has her license suspended, and is forced to take mundane, low-risk job -- although we never actually get to see her perform it.

Enter Carter Burke (Paul Reiser), who tells her that the planet her former ship landed on is now colonized, and has been for decades. But Earth is no longer getting a signal from the colonized part of that planet. He doesn't know what it is, whether aliens are doing it or if it's a simple power outage, but he wants Ripley to help the marine force check it out, acting as a consultant. Ripley is initially reluctant, but caves in after she is offered her old job back.

But of course aliens are to blame for the loss of communication. The team arrives at the planet only to find it abandoned. Then they're ambushed, and decide to leave, only to have their ship destroyed. They're trapped and are told by one of the soldiers that they'd have to hold out seventeen days in order for anyone to send help. They're now trapped, just like the crew in the first film, only this time, there are many aliens instead of one. But this time, the humans have guns, so it's a fair fight. Right?

[Img_Inline width="275" height="177" Caption="Yay for guns!" Align="right"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/aliens10.jpg[/Img_Inline]

At this point, we've gotten over and hour into the film and have only had one action scene. It seems like it could carry the same type of tone as the first Alien film. I thought it would, and I was ready for it to degenerate into another slasher film. After all, in a series of slasher films, the enemy never really dies. But that's not what happens here. Instead, it becomes a nonstop action film that doesn't let up on the action for the next hour and a bit.

It's for this reason that Aliens is a lot better than Alien. Instead of becoming a weaker version of a genre that is fairly oversaturated, it becomes a strong version of a genre that is very oversaturated. The difference is that it does the genre well, instead of being just "okay". It doesn't let up, and the lives at stake are actually ones we care about, thanks to the first hour of the film that builds them up.

This time, I did care for the people who were set-up to be alien food. They all got enough time for me to get to know them, and they didn't take anything too seriously. The exception to this rule is Ripley, who continues being the most serious person in this series, wishing to just kill every last alien and then get out of dodge. The side characters are memorable and likable though, so when their lives are at stake, we want to see some sort of miracle to aid them in escaping.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="159" Caption="Looks post-apocalyptic, doesn't it?" Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/alien-10.jpg[/Img_Inline]

The action scenes, which populate the final hour of the film, are tremendous. Not only are they thrilling and have real importance to the story, but they're also inventive and simply exciting. Guns, flamethrowers and grenades all get involved at different points, with a nuclear bomb even having the potential to go off. The plan that the group finally decides is that they'll just nuke the planet, much to the chagrin of the business representative that followed the marines into battle.

That's something that the film hammers home near the beginning and during a couple of scenes during the middle: Big corporations are evil. They initially don't believe Ripley's story about the alien in the first film, and then they don't want to do anything that might cost them a bunch of money. At one point, the idea to smuggle an alien home after the mission is complete is attempted. (And we all know how great an idea that would be, don't we?)

I lied earlier, there's one more thing that the first two Alien films have in common: Something cute that we don't want to see die. In the first film, it was a cat. In this one, it's a little girl nicknamed Newt (Carrie Henn) that the adult cast finds in the wreckage on this planet. She initially doesn't talk, but eventually warms to Ripley enough to call her "mommy". Ripley sees her own daughter in this child, and promises to protect her no matter what. "Cross her heart and hope to die." Oh, and the visual effects hold up just fine in Aliens as well, so there's that too.

Aliens is a superior film when compared to its predecessor, because it does its genre well, instead of just in an average way. It's essentially an action film that has a lot of build-up to the action, which means you're in for a heart-pounding thrill ride. It's a departure from the subdued nature of Alien, but that ended up being a good decision in my eyes. It's an exciting film that has good effects and unrelenting action, which makes it definitely worthy of a watch.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,462
0
0
Good review matt Im looking forward to seeing this movie....some day.

But oh well Im just gonna have to stick to this Amazing Aleins rap till I see the movie.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Odbarc said:
I'm not reading any of that. But I liked this movie.
Then why'd you come into the Review Section if you're not going to read the reviews!?

OT: It's a well written review, although mentioning Newt and the cat from the first film felt kind of throwaway. Maybe that's what you intended, but having a small girl tag along with the soldiers feels like a big enough plot point to mention earlier in the review.
 

ImSkeletor

New member
Feb 6, 2010
1,473
0
0
I actually like Alien and Aliens equally though I think one reason maybe because I had not seen many slasher movies which made the movie very fresh. I might have to see it again to see if it still holds up.

Anyway good review.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
I can't agree that Aliens is a better film than Alien in any way. Aliens is just a bunch of macho space marines blazing away at the Aliens. Alien actually had pacing and a decent character exploration.
Aliens itself is a good movie, compared to Alien, it's a stupid movie that does not belong with the other 3.
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
Aliens is my favourite out of the series.

They got incredibly stupid after that.

Alien Resurrection should never have been made.

The problem with Alien 3 was, we didn't give a crap if they lived or died. They replaced the likes of Newt and Hicks with rapists and murderers in a space prison. Aliens did a favour purgung the place.

Alien Resurrection .... I have no words to describe how bad this film is.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
TimeLord said:
I can't agree that Aliens is a better film than Alien in any way. Aliens is just a bunch of macho space marines blazing away at the Aliens. Alien actually had pacing and a decent character exploration.
Aliens itself is a good movie, compared to Alien, it's a stupid movie that does not belong with the other 3.
I second this.

I can point out many reasons why Aliens is not that good, but I'll state the most important one: The Aliens are made less alien by turning them into giant ants. The entire alien setting from the first movie felt truly "alien", something beyond human comprehension, and because of that the alien derelict, the Space Jockey, and the Alien itself felt unnerving and terrifying.

And because Aliens creates a link between the Aliens and ants, it loses all that. The Aliens are no longer scary and have basically become cannon fodder.

Oh, and that stupid little girl. God, I hated her.
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
TimeLord said:
I can't agree that Aliens is a better film than Alien in any way. Aliens is just a bunch of macho space marines blazing away at the Aliens. Alien actually had pacing and a decent character exploration.
Aliens itself is a good movie, compared to Alien, it's a stupid movie that does not belong with the other 3.
You honestly prefer the third and fourth movies to Aliens? Ouch. Seriously, ouch. I mean Alien: Resurrection was so bad I'd compare it to the Star Wars prequels in that it managed to single-handedly kill my interest in an entire franchise.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
The Madman said:
TimeLord said:
I can't agree that Aliens is a better film than Alien in any way. Aliens is just a bunch of macho space marines blazing away at the Aliens. Alien actually had pacing and a decent character exploration.
Aliens itself is a good movie, compared to Alien, it's a stupid movie that does not belong with the other 3.
You honestly prefer the third and fourth movies to Aliens? Ouch. Seriously, ouch. I mean Alien: Resurrection was so bad I'd compare it to the Star Wars prequels in that it managed to single-handedly kill my interest in an entire franchise.
While Alien: Resurrection is a crap movie, I can almost sorta forgive it because I found the intial concept pretty interesting.

The concept had the promise of becoming a great body horror movie, like The Fly. It would've been a great send off to the franchise to see Ripley slowy turn into a mutant human/alien hybrid throughout the duration of the movie.

This didn't happen ofcourse, but because that creative spark was kinda there I'll always have a very small soft spot for this movie.
 

N3Burgener

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
43
0
11
TimeLord said:
I can't agree that Aliens is a better film than Alien in any way. Aliens is just a bunch of macho space marines blazing away at the Aliens. Alien actually had pacing and a decent character exploration.
I share these sentiments. Of the however-many marines they add into the mix, the only ones that have any kind of memorable role or characterization are Michael Biehn, Hudson, and Vasquez. Everyone else is just "stereotypical jarhead there to die." I also didn't care much for the way that individual xenomorphs became so underpowered in the sequel; one was terrifying enough in the first movie, but in the sequel one is just fodder to be thrown at the marines.
 

BlueInkAlchemist

Ridiculously Awesome
Jun 4, 2008
2,231
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
While Alien: Resurrection is a crap movie, I can almost sorta forgive it because I found the intial concept pretty interesting.

The concept had the promise of becoming a great body horror movie, like The Fly. It would've been a great send off to the franchise to see Ripley slowy turn into a mutant human/alien hybrid throughout the duration of the movie.

This didn't happen ofcourse, but because that creative spark was kinda there I'll always have a very small soft spot for this movie.
You know, I can't help but agree. Alien: Resurrection had a lot of potential that occasionally peeked through the crappy CG and overly campy moments. It's kind of like the first live-action Transformers in that while I cringe at some bits, I can appreciate what some of the film-makers may have been trying to do.

However, I can't agree that Aliens is inferior to Alien. While it's true that some of the mystique fades from the creatures due to how they are presented, there's still good characterization in the marines that aren't disposable (I won't say which ones) and Marter makes a good point on the breakneck pace of the second act into the third. What separates the Colonial Marines of Aliens from the space marines of just about any other shooter game or film is the ability of some key members to emote in a believable way. I can think of a few scenes where, even where few if any words are spoken, we feel for them.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
SirBryghtside said:
OT: Nice review. I've been meaning to check this film out, I watched the first one and didn't like it that much, but this one looks a lot more like my kind of film.
I would add my recommendation on, I didn't like the first film either but I thought this one was much better.

OT: I agree with this review, I found Alien boring for the most part and though Alien 3 had an interesting premise it was difficult to sympaphise with a bunch of murderers and rapists who all bar one were forgettable and I couldn't forgive the film for...

killing off Newt and Hicks either right at the beginning! Completely negates all that saving (and becoming the new mother of her) Ridley did for the little girl in the second movie.
 

BadgeMan

New member
May 21, 2009
59
0
0
I always thought of Alien as an amazing horror film and Aliens as a great action film. Watched Aliens on DVD just the other day and I felt while some bits didn't stand up too well to the ravages of time (the initial drop in), for the most part it held up pretty well visually. So many memorable lines ("Hey Vasquez, ever been mistaken for a man?" "No. How about you?"), and great action sequences. As for the Aliens being cannon fodder, don't forget they wiped out most of the marines in their first encounter, and unlike the first movie the marines were heavily armed and able to take out more aliens before dying.
Alien 3 I found kind of dull, definitely not as enjoyable as the previous installments, and I actually liked Alien Resurrection up to a point, but the whole newborn thing was really just plain silly. I think the film was originally meant to have a portion of it take place on the space ship, crashing towards Earth and then the rest taking place on Earth which I would have found much more interesting.

Good review btw.
 

CJSinc

New member
May 1, 2011
48
0
0
I still prefer the first alien as my favourite, im slightly heartbroken that its so cheap yet such a great movie :'(
 

Odbarc

Elite Member
Jun 30, 2010
1,155
0
41
SirBryghtside said:
Odbarc said:
I'm not reading any of that. But I liked this movie.
...yeah, not a very good idea to say that, especially when the reviewer is a Mod :p

OT: Nice review. I've been meaning to check this film out, I watched the first one and didn't like it that much, but this one looks a lot more like my kind of film.
Maybe s/he'll consider an alternation which may improve the attractiveness of the reviews and more people will read it.
I think maybe quoting a line in the movie and highlight it in bold would attract the eyes to a specific paragraph or sentence, especially around a plot point would be nice.


lacktheknack said:
Odbarc said:
I'm not reading any of that. But I liked this movie.
Then why'd you come into the Review Section if you're not going to read the reviews!?

OT: It's a well written review, although mentioning Newt and the cat from the first film felt kind of throwaway. Maybe that's what you intended, but having a small girl tag along with the soldiers feels like a big enough plot point to mention earlier in the review.
It was in the hot-topics (new posts) section. I clicked it because it had no replies on it yet either. I was curious, I looked.
 

RussetRanger

New member
Jan 31, 2010
325
0
0
Aliens = one of the best sequels ever! Stand-alone greatness along with building upon the predecesor.
 

Odbarc

Elite Member
Jun 30, 2010
1,155
0
41
SirBryghtside said:
Odbarc said:
SirBryghtside said:
Odbarc said:
I'm not reading any of that. But I liked this movie.
...yeah, not a very good idea to say that, especially when the reviewer is a Mod :p

OT: Nice review. I've been meaning to check this film out, I watched the first one and didn't like it that much, but this one looks a lot more like my kind of film.
Maybe s/he'll consider an alternation which may improve the attractiveness of the reviews and more people will read it.
I think maybe quoting a line in the movie and highlight it in bold would attract the eyes to a specific paragraph or sentence, especially around a plot point would be nice.


lacktheknack said:
Odbarc said:
I'm not reading any of that. But I liked this movie.
Then why'd you come into the Review Section if you're not going to read the reviews!?

OT: It's a well written review, although mentioning Newt and the cat from the first film felt kind of throwaway. Maybe that's what you intended, but having a small girl tag along with the soldiers feels like a big enough plot point to mention earlier in the review.
It was in the hot-topics (new posts) section. I clicked it because it had no replies on it yet either. I was curious, I looked.
Doesn't mean you need to post. Jesus Christ...
Good point. You didn't need to either. What compelled you?