your logic is pretty sound. i concur!Pyro Paul said:wrong. Time is relative.Denamic said:Without time, there's no heat.
And the air itself would be like impenetrable concrete.
And there would be no light, as it would be standing still.
So you'd be unable to see, unable to breathe, unable to move, in absolute zero.
such a machine, if it existed, would make you go(occulate) at 1.5 times the speed of light while retaining all preceptive inputs. at such speed your preception of time would be so finite that to you, time would stop, but to every one else less it would go on normal.
it is like a camera. We normally experience things at 30 frames per second. but if you took a high speed camera and made it film 30,000 frames per second, but played it back at 30 frames per second, the high speed film would have 16 minutes of content while the normal camera would have 1 second of content.
simply said, you experience 24 hours, but for every one else, only 1 second has passed.
the only problem with this is that either you're unable to interact with anything as you're occulating at too high a frequency (you would pass right through things). or because your physical entity is moving at 1.5 times the speed of light, the first thing you touch would cause an explosion that rivals the big bang.
although i always wondered, if you spun around in a circle going at least than the speed of light, would you be seen by people or would you just be some other dimension vacuum? (going around that fast in a circle would cause some kind of tornado thing, wouldn't it?)