I'm not sure it's a matter of gender-related-status, the 'Hardcore' vs. 'Casual' issue is just a matter of elitism.
Most people, regardless of what circle or background they come from want to be recognized for their achievements, to be seen as king of the castle. It's sad that nowerdays a lot of people obsesses over their own arrogant position as a 'hardcore' gamer and use it as an excuse to act like a dipshit to others who perhaps don't have as much experience playing games.
I'm not saying the term 'hardcore' is essentially bad, it's just a label which descibes the dedicated amount of time which a player plays games - an experienced 'hardcore' gamer can still be a decent guy towards casual players. Sadly though nowerdays 'hardcore' is growing to be a desciption of ATTITUDE rather than gaming experience.
Because of this, I think using the term 'Gamer' without the specifity of Hardcore or casual would just make it more inclusive and universal...besides, opening up to and accepting a wider audience, however keen they are about games, can only a good thing surely?
Most people, regardless of what circle or background they come from want to be recognized for their achievements, to be seen as king of the castle. It's sad that nowerdays a lot of people obsesses over their own arrogant position as a 'hardcore' gamer and use it as an excuse to act like a dipshit to others who perhaps don't have as much experience playing games.
I'm not saying the term 'hardcore' is essentially bad, it's just a label which descibes the dedicated amount of time which a player plays games - an experienced 'hardcore' gamer can still be a decent guy towards casual players. Sadly though nowerdays 'hardcore' is growing to be a desciption of ATTITUDE rather than gaming experience.
Because of this, I think using the term 'Gamer' without the specifity of Hardcore or casual would just make it more inclusive and universal...besides, opening up to and accepting a wider audience, however keen they are about games, can only a good thing surely?