My sympathy to these peoples' families, but I find it hard to be genuinely sad when soldiers die if I don't know them.
Cause: embargoDevil said:Where did you get MILLIONS? Are you talking about when Saddam was in control?
I take it then that if you and one of the soldiers were held at gunpoint and only one of you would live and you had to decide, you would choose the soldier over your own life.Arsen said:Yeah. I'd say those thirty outweight the irrelevant, small thousand. Quality over quantity.retyopy said:Right. 30 dead. Because that's so much more important than the fact that over 1500 Iraqi citizens, completely innocent, have been killed...
There is a right to this war. They call themselves warriors of Islam, but Islam dictates that you should not kill. They serve only themselves, and they lost any moral high ground they once had when they started INTENTIONALLY killing civilians to feed their greed.Kopikatsu said:Not sure if anyone responded to this, but uh...hypocritical much?Jakub324 said:It's war, people die. Still, the Coalition will kill 100 Taliban within a week for revenge. Bastards. Condolences to those affected by the incident; nobody should have loved ones taken from them.
'30 guys died? That's awful. I condolences to their families, it must be rough losing someone you love. BUT AT LEAST WE'RE GOING TO KILL HUNDREDS OF THE OTHER GUYS. THEY'RE JUST FACELESS MONSTERS WITH NO FAMILY, WIVES, OR KIDS, AMIRIGHT?'
There's no right or wrong to war. There's just your side and the other side.
It's called the Monkeysphere. The smaller the number, the more 'tragic' it is. Five million people die? Statistic. Five people die? Tragedy.Dragonclaw said:I think it's amazing how times have changed...look how many died in any WW2 battle and we're shocked at a loss of 30...Personally I think we should have learned from the Soviets that Afganistan is pretty much an unwinnable quagmire...especially when there's no real objective other than "get rid of random people shooting at us"
Well, if you had to make a mistake one way or the other, it'd be better to assume it was an accident and then later change it to an attack if it was wrong than the other way around, wouldn't it? I think in terms of the "up to the minute coverage" it's more likely to be a mistake or an incorrect assumption than an actual lie, because first reports are often muddled and confused, and often times they end up picking a source and just going with it rather than waiting a bit for verification. They do let their personal beliefs color it to much, but outside of FOX and political commercials they rarely do straight out lying.The Virgo said:They knew that a helicopter fell out of the sky somewhere over 7,000 miles away and who was on board, but didn't know that a rocket hit it? Uh-huh, right. The news media has either lied or warped the truth so many times that I look upon everything they do with skepticism. At the very least, until they knew for certain, they shouldn't have said "accident".Ironic Pirate said:Yeah, they never just make mistakes, do they? No, everyone in the news media is a soul-less, godless flesh eating zombie created for one purpose: lying through their teeth. That is demonstrably true, and everyone knows they're all payed off buy the government with tax dollars. There's no way they're just incompetent, they all have an agenda, every one.The Virgo said:The news over here said it was an "accident".
Then again, I never believed it was an "accident". I always thought it had been attacked. A multi-million dollar helicopter doesn't just malfunction like that.
And they say we have a "free press".
EDIT: Oh, NOW they're saying it was an attack. God, I really fucking hate the news media, bunch of lying, dick-yanking bastards!
Sorry if that was a little much, but the escapist has a seemingly massive population of Bill Hicks wannabes, and it's annoying.
By the way, surprise that you were the one who replied, because I had actually been looking for you. I have to ask you: where did you find that GIF, the one you're using as a profile pic? I have to know, it's so awful and evil it's fantastic!Bambi getting eaten by killer whale = win!
I remember one time Wolf Blitzer on The Situation Room was interviewing some guy (I forget who, it was years ago) who they said was this and that (you know the whole "evil person" drill), but when they tried to make him look bad, he held firm and started saying things that started making sense. Eventually, Wolf said, "The satellite is going down, we have to end the interview."Ironic Pirate said:Well, if you had to make a mistake one way or the other, it'd be better to assume it was an accident and then later change it to an attack if it was wrong than the other way around, wouldn't it? I think in terms of the "up to the minute coverage" it's more likely to be a mistake or an incorrect assumption than an actual lie, because first reports are often muddled and confused, and often times they end up picking a source and just going with it rather than waiting a bit for verification. They do let their personal beliefs color it to much, but outside of FOX and political commercials they rarely do straight out lying.The Virgo said:They knew that a helicopter fell out of the sky somewhere over 7,000 miles away and who was on board, but didn't know that a rocket hit it? Uh-huh, right. The news media has either lied or warped the truth so many times that I look upon everything they do with skepticism. At the very least, until they knew for certain, they shouldn't have said "accident".Ironic Pirate said:Yeah, they never just make mistakes, do they? No, everyone in the news media is a soul-less, godless flesh eating zombie created for one purpose: lying through their teeth. That is demonstrably true, and everyone knows they're all payed off buy the government with tax dollars. There's no way they're just incompetent, they all have an agenda, every one.The Virgo said:The news over here said it was an "accident".
Then again, I never believed it was an "accident". I always thought it had been attacked. A multi-million dollar helicopter doesn't just malfunction like that.
And they say we have a "free press".
EDIT: Oh, NOW they're saying it was an attack. God, I really fucking hate the news media, bunch of lying, dick-yanking bastards!
Sorry if that was a little much, but the escapist has a seemingly massive population of Bill Hicks wannabes, and it's annoying.
By the way, surprise that you were the one who replied, because I had actually been looking for you. I have to ask you: where did you find that GIF, the one you're using as a profile pic? I have to know, it's so awful and evil it's fantastic!Bambi getting eaten by killer whale = win!
http://senorgif.memebase.com/2010/04/17/funny-animated-gifs-willy-nooooo/
I don't think that's where I actually found it, but it looks to be the same.
Sizzle Montyjing said:Yeah, but usually not in this large a number.zombie goat fetish said:That's the bloody truth of war folks, people die.
We all know people die in war, but does that make it any less tragic than a murder, or even a string of serial killings?
And if thirty people had died due to a serial killer, you wouldn't be saying that people just die.
The reason I don't feel sad is because they joined the army or marines or whatever. If those were people who had been drafted, I would feel sorry for them because they didn't have a choice and they weren't fast enough to get across the border. But there's no draft; those people joined knowing the dangers. They wanted to be on the front lines, well they got it.katsumoto03 said:You mean people who were actively participating in war were killed? My heart breaks, honestly.
My sympathy to these peoples' families, but I find it hard to be genuinely sad when soldiers die if I don't know them.
Again, I already kind of apologized for that comment, still, I sstand by everything else I said.One Hit Noob said:No. Just no. This is what the public thinks about the military, showoffs and jackasses. Some people join the military just for that, but as soon as you strap on those boots, put on that uniform, and leave boot camp, it isn't a movie, it isn't a game. It's what happens when you enter the harsh world of war. Everybody I met who at least served the military hate war and never want to go back, but they have to because it just became their job. Quit making such generalizations.Crazycat690 said:The only thing sad about it is that the US troops seem to believe they are the star in their own personal war movie.
Because it's been one day.cyrogeist said:why wont this thread just die already...
I don't think it's much, but hell, BBC had it as front page news on their website, and one death gets reported as major story over here, so to hell with it.derelict said:Sizzle Montyjing said:Yeah, but usually not in this large a number.zombie goat fetish said:That's the bloody truth of war folks, people die.
We all know people die in war, but does that make it any less tragic than a murder, or even a string of serial killings?
And if thirty people had died due to a serial killer, you wouldn't be saying that people just die.
Thirty is a large number of casualties now? Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I'd not bat much of an eye after hearing about some of the wars my pop was in.
That smacks more of general incompetence than evil. They tried to make him a bad guy and panicked, which implies a personal failing on Wolf's part rather than the media itself. Something like 90% of people in any given field either don't give a shit or are totally incompetent, and that ratio is likely even higher in the media. I don't 'trust' them, but I also don't assume they're sitting in a dark castle plotting how to mislead people for mysterious reasons, like in the Simpsons.The Virgo said:I remember one time Wolf Blitzer on The Situation Room was interviewing some guy (I forget who, it was years ago) who they said was this and that (you know the whole "evil person" drill), but when they tried to make him look bad, he held firm and started saying things that started making sense. Eventually, Wolf said, "The satellite is going down, we have to end the interview."Ironic Pirate said:Well, if you had to make a mistake one way or the other, it'd be better to assume it was an accident and then later change it to an attack if it was wrong than the other way around, wouldn't it? I think in terms of the "up to the minute coverage" it's more likely to be a mistake or an incorrect assumption than an actual lie, because first reports are often muddled and confused, and often times they end up picking a source and just going with it rather than waiting a bit for verification. They do let their personal beliefs color it to much, but outside of FOX and political commercials they rarely do straight out lying.The Virgo said:They knew that a helicopter fell out of the sky somewhere over 7,000 miles away and who was on board, but didn't know that a rocket hit it? Uh-huh, right. The news media has either lied or warped the truth so many times that I look upon everything they do with skepticism. At the very least, until they knew for certain, they shouldn't have said "accident".Ironic Pirate said:Yeah, they never just make mistakes, do they? No, everyone in the news media is a soul-less, godless flesh eating zombie created for one purpose: lying through their teeth. That is demonstrably true, and everyone knows they're all payed off buy the government with tax dollars. There's no way they're just incompetent, they all have an agenda, every one.The Virgo said:The news over here said it was an "accident".
Then again, I never believed it was an "accident". I always thought it had been attacked. A multi-million dollar helicopter doesn't just malfunction like that.
And they say we have a "free press".
EDIT: Oh, NOW they're saying it was an attack. God, I really fucking hate the news media, bunch of lying, dick-yanking bastards!
Sorry if that was a little much, but the escapist has a seemingly massive population of Bill Hicks wannabes, and it's annoying.
By the way, surprise that you were the one who replied, because I had actually been looking for you. I have to ask you: where did you find that GIF, the one you're using as a profile pic? I have to know, it's so awful and evil it's fantastic!Bambi getting eaten by killer whale = win!
http://senorgif.memebase.com/2010/04/17/funny-animated-gifs-willy-nooooo/
I don't think that's where I actually found it, but it looks to be the same.
THE SATELLITE IS GOING DOWN?! WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!! What happened is that you tried to make him look like the bad guy, but he had his shit together more than you thought and you didn't even the balls to admit that he was right and you came up with the most shit excuse ever! >:-(
Never, EVER, trust the media. That is probably the best advice I have to give you.
Also, thanks for the link to the GIF!I really appreciate it!
For those dirty foreigners to bend the knee and kiss the shiny barrel of their new overlord military's guns. Personally, I am impressed whenever a bunch of peasants manage to do what they did there, at least it's a major improvement over killing themselves.Asti said:Gee, guys. You're at war. What do you expect?