Couldn't have said it better than this guy.Simalacrum said:I seriously doubt that those claims are true.
Considering that Nintendo rarely focuses its time/money/effort on beefier power, it seems very un-Nintendo-ish to do such a thing.
In fact, one could say that Nintendo is most commercially successful when they focus on innovation (or gimmicks, depending on the console/perception) rather than power - the NES, SNES, Game Boy, Wii, etc, are all out-classed in terms of power when it comes to competition, yet all said consoles have sold bucket loads - compare that to consoles like the N64, and one can see a correlation between lack of power (and price), and sale figures.
Heck, I'd be surprised if the 3DS turned out be more powerful/graphically capable than the PSP! (though, not that surprised, naturally)
Right, because the SNES being more powerful than the Mega Drive, the N64 being more powerful than the PSX and the Gamecube being more powerful than the PS2 was all just a happy coincidence. People need to stop looking at the Wii and thinking they know Nintendo's full history and ideology.Terramax said:Couldn't have said it better than this guy.Simalacrum said:I seriously doubt that those claims are true.
Considering that Nintendo rarely focuses its time/money/effort on beefier power, it seems very un-Nintendo-ish to do such a thing.
In fact, one could say that Nintendo is most commercially successful when they focus on innovation (or gimmicks, depending on the console/perception) rather than power - the NES, SNES, Game Boy, Wii, etc, are all out-classed in terms of power when it comes to competition, yet all said consoles have sold bucket loads - compare that to consoles like the N64, and one can see a correlation between lack of power (and price), and sale figures.
Heck, I'd be surprised if the 3DS turned out be more powerful/graphically capable than the PSP! (though, not that surprised, naturally)
I think they're more likely to focus more on giving it the same attributes as the competing Iphone and Ipad have than making it a graphical showpiece.
Errrmm....No, the 360 is not a 8800GT, it's equivalent to whatever Radeons were around in 2005...X900 or whatever they were, and similarly, the PS3 is based on a GeForce 7900. If they were 9800GTX+'s, then the home consoles would be able to achieve 1080p, which currently, they struggle with greatly.Mazty said:No it's not possible because of cooling. The 360 is on par with the 8800GT and the PS3 is on par with probably the 9800GTX+ but there is no way the 3DS will be close to either.shaboinkin said:I think it is quite possible. Why?
Gaming laptops today have GPUs that can far exceed the processing power of the 360. If I recall correctly, the gpu in the 360 is about the same as a nvidia 7800. Or something like that.
That is about the size of a laptop gpu.
All you need now is the CPU, some RAM chips and all the other necessary elements that make up a circuit board, and I do believe it could be as small as the DSi, maybe a bit bigger.
There is one thing with my claim that worries me. That laptop gpu right there has that big ass heatsink on it. Heatsink + handheld = My fingers are gonna be hot.
EDIT
Another thing that should be noted.
They say nothing about graphics. It just says it basically needs to create a copy of the game being played and show it at the same time.To provide stereoscopic 3D effects the system must have the ability to render each game field twice, one for each of the player's eyes, a technique that will require significant horsepower to produce," claims the report.
Power =/= graphic capabilities
Firstly, size - to fit in a powerful GPU and CPU you need room and there is no way they are going to be using the newly manufactured 28nm chips as that'd cost a fortune. Plus with power you need electricity and there is no way the 3DS will be able to power powerful chips unless it has a battery life of 30 mins. Also as I said before cooling will be a big issue and there is no way that chips the power of the 360 and PS3 can be cooled with simple airflow. The smallest GPU in terms of power to size that Nvidia make is the GT240 and that still needs a fan and about 60W of power, while still being quite a bit less powerful than the 8800GT, even though it is a 40nm chip.
What we are more likely to see is a console with the power of the Nvidia Tegra chip, which is somewhere between PS2 and Xbox 360 but certainly not the power of the HD consoles. It's in a lot of pads so I'd be amazed if it wasn't, or something similar, in the 3DS.
You'll be happy to hear Nintendo has announced the 3DS is an entirely self-contained 3D system, ie you can view 3D effects without the use of glasses. Which sounds cool, but it makes you wonder how portable it's going to end up being.t_rexaur said:Personally, I'm a bit dismayed that Nintendo are going down the 3D gimmick route. Oh if they make it work then fine, but I better not have to wear any sort of stupid glasses, because they just don't work with me. Saying that I've not tried the new ones they use for Avatar and such.
Yes, but then EVERY COMPANY SAYS STUFF LIKE THAT. And no where in the Article did it say "This is from the mouth of Nintendo".icaritos said:They said the same thing about the Wii, way before any detail was released. Remember how that turned out?