Why should I be expected to know this if it's completely useless for my everyday life?
Hell, I might as well argue that a good working knowledge of politics and law is more useful, as everyone takes part in elections. At least in Australia. The effects of politics affect everyone on a daily basis no matter what they think of the system.
How about a working knowledge of art and English and skill with a pen? There have been countless times where the best way for me to explain something has eluded me, and I'm normally very good at simplifying complex ideas. I believe that more skill with a pen or a more fluent understanding of my language would have benefited me greatly.
Hell, I've not used maths at all since I passed the GCSE with a C. Except in economics, and that's just long, long strings of very simple addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and powers. Everyone can do that with a few hours teaching and some practice.
I never intend to re-learn it. You can blabber on all you like about how maths is everywhere, but that crap is what every teacher cites, and it's just not true.
This is all redundant anyway. We've got computers and the ability to look up any knowledge we need at a moment's notice. Perhaps it's time we changed the way we think.
I think you're taking a very arrogant view by holding your subject above others. Especially as you're lauding it over the arts and humanities, both of which have very long and illustrious histories. Maths and Science are useful, but they're not everything. They are tools we utilise to achieve objectives. The setting of those objectives is determined by our humanity, and that is reflected by the arts and humanities. Observing your own humanity in the mirror of the arts is knowing your objectives, and knowing your objectives gives you a purpose. In the end- what are we without a purpose?