Stall said:
Hides His Eyes said:
Why is it illogical to ask about the best performances of the century so far? If I ask about the decade then I cut off 2010 and 2011. As for independent or foreign films, I don't know what your point is. It's sad that most people watch mostly big-budget American films so we shouldn't discuss our favourite films performances
Because the decade is only fucking 11 years old. It's not "best performances so far" or something... but "best performances". You are basically making objective statements over 89 years of film that has yet to exist. Even further, if you cut off 2010 and 2011, why wouldn't you say "best of the previous decade"? That statement is not only airtight and less illogical, but makes a whole lot more sense than "best of the century".
And good for you... you can name off one actor from a highly mainstream foreign film. Should I be impressed? It just strikes me as rather... ironic when people try to make statements about the "best whatever" in films when they have only watch one kind of film. I don't watch many other types of film either, so I don't try to make statements about the "best" since I know I might be missing amazing performances. It's just funny when people think they can have some kind of opinion on films with they barely even watch them.
There are so many problems with this post that I don't know where to start.
Ok.
Yes, it IS "best performances so far" because I said it was, and it's my thread. I am interested in hearing people's favourite performances of the 21st century up to this point. I am not interested in the 89 years we haven't had yet. And if you want to make a thread about people's favourite performances from 2000 to 2009 then go and make one.
And the "statement" in my original post is not illogical, it makes perfect sense, you just don't like the idea of it for some reason that I confess I still don't understand.
And no, of course you shouldn't be "impressed" that I can name an actor from a foreign film. What the hell kind of pretentious person even thinks in those terms?
Next: big-budget American films are not "one kind of film". My list of five included a historical drama, a biopic drama, a crime thriller, a psychological horror-drama sort of thing, and an action film which was also a superhero film, yet another type. Just because they all came from the big-budget film industry does not make them the same type of film, and does not make my taste narrow.
Naturally I expect people to limit their answers to films they have actually seen. If all those films happen to be Hollywood films then fine, that's not exactly surprising is it? If it includes a bunch of independent European films, that's great too. Everyone's opinion is limited by their experience, that's just common sense. Even if someone had only seen one film and they simply chose five of the actors in that film, their opinion would be perfectly valid. Probably not worth a whole lot to most of us, but nothing to get pissed off about.
If you're a troll, consider your mission accomplished.
EDIT: Oh and where on earth did you get "objective statements" from? I thought I made it pretty clear this was a thread about people's opinions. Apparently not clear enough.