The Plunk said:
The vast majority of people will be parents at some point in their lives. And yet, we expect people to just magically know how to raise a kid. If they taught basic parenting classes in schools we could avoid many cases of people failing as parents such as this one. I really can't see any reason why this would be a bad idea.
Some schools do have a course in parenthood. My high school had one, but it was entirely optional. The only people that took that class were girls who were looking to have children the moment they graduated, and then they had children the moment they graduated. I feel most of them found it was easier to go down the road of house wife than to get a job, since all the ones that I spoke too really slacked off in every other class, but just enough to still graduate if they did at all.
Children die all the time, as do people, and sometimes they die because of their own parents. It's been going on long before this case, and while it's horrible to read up on a scenario where this actually happened, it's no different than any other scenario. However, I feel that having a mandatory parenthood class will not stop these scenarios from happening. Especially in cases like this where common sense should have easily told the woman "It's not a good idea to strike a 5 year old in the stomach."
You can't teach common sense to some people, and even then, it can fly out the window if a persons emotions become too extreme. People do really stupid shit when enraged. Some cannot control themselves under that kind of stress, this woman appears to be one of them. Does that excuse her of her actions? Of course not, but if anything, the woman needs guidance in learning how to control ones own emotions and impulses. Sadly, that is not taught in a parenthood class in high school. At least I wouldn't think it would be, if so, then every girl I've spoken too back in high school needs to take that class over again, because a lot of them were just bat shit crazy!
The woman is most likely not sick in the head, and if so, then not severely. She simply lost her cool. The story does not state whether or not there were outside factors leading up to this or not. As other people have stated, she could have been under intense stress from an outside source.
Looking it over again, it doesn't even state how enraged she was. There are so many questions that this article does not answer, though one would only have to assume you'd have to hit a child fairly hard in the stomach in order to render them dead.
What bothers me though, is that the wii is involved in this story when it shouldn't be. That's going to cause a stir in the media. When it comes down to it. A kid broke a TV and the mother hit him and 'accidentally' killed him. It doesn't matter how, or with what, especially since a wiimote comes with a strap to keep things like this from happening, and the wii itself takes any chance it gets to remind you to wear it. Now if the kid WAS wearing it and it happened to snap off. Then there is a problem with faulty equipment.
Which also brings in a lot of other factors. Was it faulty when they received it? Did it wear down after a lot of use? That sort of thing.
Yay for rambling on... What are we talking about again?
StellarViking said:
The post is leaving out a crucial part of the story, and I think it should be edited in.
The child died FIVE DAYS after the beating from his mother. She didn't take him to the hospital because she was afraid she'd get in trouble. FIVE FUCKING DAYS. She didn't just beat him straight to death, she beat him and let him suffer because she was afraid of the consequences. Imagine being that young and in excruciating pain and your mom ignores you because she doesn't want to get in trouble. This is the lowest humanity has sunk in a while here.
Yeah, that's something that really should be in this article. Again, emotions getting the best of her. Fear can mislead so easily
