UNKNOWNINCOGNITO said:
Have you ever seen the documentry "Loose Change ?" look it up on youtube because it perfectly explains how 9/11 was a inside job with great detail.
Oh and there are some obvious "WTF"'s in 9/11 because of the melting point of the structures metals and the fuel that was said to catch fire did not match up since kerosene ( I think thats the fuels name) burns with a lower tempreture then the metals boiling points.
as well as the obvious one. Buildings only collpase on them selves with controlled demoltion! Seriously if you see that way they fall considering they were hit by a damn plane it makes no sense to why the towers ended up falling in on them selves rather then breaking apart or toppling over.
but true fact is that there is more to 9/11 then what people say and the american goverment perfectly has the potential to do this since they did something similar back in the 50's (or 60's sorry don't know the exact date) ,, where a plan was made to frame cuba for attacking a airline with american citizans in it when really it was a plan that would be flying over cuba and be there were bombs inside and they would be denonated remotely from another area, ofcourse this plan was never executed but it proves what there capable of now and watch that documentry if you want realistic answers.
(And another thing thats for sure they really pissed of the muslims for making them sound like terrorist)
You know almost everything in "Loose Change" is either outright lies, misconceptions, or just plain inaccurate information right?
You do know that any metal exposed to even a very low heat over a time period of a couple hours will begin to bend and deform completely losing it's structuaral rigidity right? Seriuosly, if you don't believe go take a spoon and set your stove top to it's lowest setting and place the spoon on top of it. After an hour or two that spoon will bend and even snap in your hand if you mess with it too much.
You do know that buildings ESPECIALLY skyscrapers are incredible succeptible to collapse if their internal supports are weakened by fire right? The planes themselves heavily damaged the internal columns of the towers. The fire then weakened them further to the point where they couldn't support the towers immense weight any longer.
You do know that buildings during demolitions, again ESPECIALLY skyscrapers, are notoriously unpredictable and even demolition experts can't predict how a building will fall. Falling, floor by floor is not proof that demo charges destroyed it. All thats proof of is that one floor collapse onto the floor beneath it, which then couldn't suport the wieght of itself and the floor above it so it then collapsed, leading to a domino effect. Again not all demolitions fall like that and even if they did how the building fell had to do with physics and proved nothing.
You also do realize that a controlled demolition of the twin towers would take hunreds upon hundreds of pounds of explosives and weeks to setup. So they somehow smuggled in all those explosives, wired them up, installed fuses, all in not just one but TWO of the most active buildings on the planet and no one noticed?
Thats not mentioning that our gov't had no motives to do this, nor would our gov't even be able to pull off the elaborate scheme that "Loose Change" tries to insinuate that they do.
But you know those are just facts, who listens to facts when someones spinning a good story.
-----------
thiosk said:
The government is able to pull off something like that? Forget motive-- we are talking about the same government right? the US government? The bay-of-pigs government?
Not likely.
HAH I shit you not thats exactly what I said when i first heard the conspiracy theory. Man the gov't
wishes it was good enough to pull of the scheme this people try to spin.
