95% population reduction

[SqueeFactor]

http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html

I learned about it off a movie called 'Esoteric Agenda.' Pretty good, kinda preachy towards the end. Anyhow, the World Health Organization and the world's top governments are planning to start 'codex alimentarius' on December 31, 2009.

I'm no conspiracy theory psycho-type with tin foil on my ceiling, but given all the food recalls and the downward slant of worldwide diplomacy, it's doesn't seem so far fetched that top officials will regain control over people by controlling one of our basic necessities- food. For instance, fluoride in the water is bad, to say the least. It puts holes in your blood cells and screws up your teeth in large amounts. The after the food recalls of peaches, tomatoes and spinach, people started to notice it didn't taste quite the same, something seems to be 'missing.'

Anyhow, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daN8249zTYk&feature=related

Thats just one video you can watch to see what people are saying about it. Just be sure to mute it at 5:55.

 

[asinann]

You underestimate how many bullets there really are.

 

[Mardy]

I don't think it's going to happen either way. "Ooh noo, killer food is killing us!"

 

[traceur_]

All problems will be solved by diplomacy and a barrage of missiles, preferably at the same time.

 

[Lullabye]

The majority owns food, in no way can they control all farmers and industries.

Exactly, the masses cannot be controlled. Lets see 5% of the world controll 95% of the world, there aren't enough bullets.

All power to the people.

bombs. not bullets. And you really only need a few well placed ones to do the job.

 

[zeroharpuia]

5% controlling 95% just isnt plausible. I mean remember slavery? 60% controlling 40%, and in the end it didn't work out.

So what I'm saying is IF there is a plot and IF it is sucessful, it wouldn't last very long.

 

[headshotcatcher]

Is that serious? Come on, she even said she and her children won't survive..

 

[Aardvark Soup]

Like most conspiracy theories that haven't got any valid evidence to support their outrageous claims: bullcrap. If you just think about it for a moment you realise how unpractical, illogical and plain impossible this is. But since I'm just a disguised reptile monster alien working for the government/pharaceutical industry/Illuminati, just ignore me and make up some more conspiracy theories if that makes you happy.

 

[super_smash_jesus]

Oh man, it was hard listening to that load of garbage...

 

[Kuliani]

That is unproven. Having done a report on it, there is no compelling evidence that fluoride in small, controlled amounts is detrimental to a persons health. Somewhat different in minors, but all in all it strengthens a persons tooth enamel from 5 and upwards.
To be blunt, things like codex alimentarius are utter, utter crap, usually written by some uneducated loon trying to give himself some kind of academic credibility which they have never had due to a lack of brain cells. It's either a conspiracy, the New World Order or some other crap we should be worried about and arm ourselves to teeth over.
As for the earth's limit to how many people it can sustain, then war could happen, but not for a long time, and with the rate of cybernetics, I doubt in 500 years if we actually need food and just a power plant to hook up to.

Correct, fluoride strengthens tooth enamel, which is the opposite of screwing up teeth. Almost all toothpaste also contains fluoride as an active ingredient to further provide strengthening. The addition of fluoride to the water supplies is extremely common: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation

But for those interested in why people don't like it, read the oppositions argument: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_opposition

But, statistically, 40% of childhood cavities are prevented due to fluoridated water supplies. (from wikipedia: Yeung CA (2007). "Fluoride prevents caries among adults of all ages". Evid Based Dent 8 (3): 72?3. doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400506. PMID 17891121.)

 

[johnman]

I couldnt even read it, Codex Alimentarius?? What kind of bullcrap name is that? Its on the same plain of thought that theres a massive alien base on the other side of the moon and the goverment just not telling us.

 

[Lullabye]

The majority owns food, in no way can they control all farmers and industries.

Exactly, the masses cannot be controlled. Lets see 5% of the world controll 95% of the world, there aren't enough bullets.

All power to the people.

bombs. not bullets. And you really only need a few well placed ones to do the job.

Why would money grubbing corporations blow up their own property?
Why would soldiers work for these people?
Why would armies hand over there weaponry (bombs etc) to people whom wish to kill 95% of the population?
Bombs have never been useful at killing an idea, an idealogy is bulletproof.

Well, money grubbing corporations would destroy there own property if it makes them more money, actually that happens quite alot(it's called fraud)
Why would soldiers work for money grubbing corporations?...uh, have you been living under a rock for these past few years? Soldiers are not always the strongest thinkers. They can usually be swayed easily with a dab of patriotism. Watch Zps lateset review on hawkx, you'll get the idea.
Good question, hmmmm, well there ARE these people called arms dealers who sell wmd's for a living. And once you conquer a contry they tend to be more helpful(usually).
An idealogy is anything but bullet proof. You cant stop people from thinking but you can control what they think about. But then look at the jews, their idealogy has been shot more than 50 cent, and they're still going strong.

 

[TopHatTim]

The majority owns food, in no way can they control all farmers and industries.

Exactly, the masses cannot be controlled. Lets see 5% of the world controll 95% of the world, there aren't enough bullets.

All power to the people.

Sweet, someone agrees with me, also I need vodka, get me some.

As you wish, comrade.

woah thats a party. lemme join in on that

 

[Damien the Pigeon]

Why do people always start conspiracy theory threads with "I'm not a crazy conspiracy theorist, but... <color=red> crazy conspiracy theory!!!"

No, I doubt this would happen. The powerful need the weak in order to have power, so even if someone wanted to do this, they never would.

 

[Farson89]

The majority owns food, in no way can they control all farmers and industries.

Exactly, the masses cannot be controlled. Lets see 5% of the world control 95% of the world, there aren't enough bullets.

All power to the people.

Throughout most of history the top 5% has controlled the other 95%, never underestimate the common man's ability to lie down and do as it's told by the man in the suit.

 

[Nomad]

5% of the population already controls 95% of the population. In fact, it's more like 2% vs 98%. Not on such an obvious level, though. That'd just be stupid. Why would they? Things are working out fine for them as they are.