I worry about how broad this "hatred" is. Is it "hatred" to not want to be around a person? Or is it only when you start thinking of violence against them? Maybe when you just start trying to hurt their feelings?Best of the 3 said:Hating someone who smokes is like hating someone because they're fat (for me, that's how I see it). You can hate the person, you can hate being fat, but you shouldn't hate a person for being fat. That's the same view I have of smokers. You shouldn't hate a person just cause they smoke.
The point is, I don't "hate" fat people or smokers. I don't want to have sex with fat people (at least not obese people), and I don't want to kiss a smoker. It's not because I hate what they do, it's because what they do affects some quality which I use to determine my level of romantic and sexual interest in them. It's not their habits that I hate, but the results. That's not unreasonable, right?
I can extend this logic -- my brother has asthma and reacts poorly to cigarettes, and my girlfriend is outright allergic to them. If you're not used to it, they probably smell bad, and if you around it long enough to be used to it, you're putting yourself at risk from second hand smoke. So I "hate" people that (without asking) smoke when I'm in the car with them, or have the audacity to get pissed when I don't want them smoking in the building with me. "Hate" in the sense that I'd rather they not do that, because it displays a marked disregard for the comfort and safety of others. It's not that they enjoy cigarettes, it's that it's that there are effects of smoking that I don't want to and shouldn't have to deal with.
That's an interesting angle. Should health care derived from tax money be used to treat people with smoke related diseases? There is a marked risk. But in that sense, I can also see an argument for not treating athletes or even hikers with tax money. There is a notable risk associated with those things too.thaluikhain said:Smokers are putting an immense burden on the health system, which is both very important and under pressure as it is.
EDIT: I just read a post that mentioned cigarette tax. So yeah, I can see an argument that they actually pay for their own government funding. I don't see much to this line of thinking anymore.