Not to mention looking like walking mailboxes.letsnoobtehpwns said:It's better than living in the Middle-East where girls aren't allowed to show any skin!
Not to mention looking like walking mailboxes.letsnoobtehpwns said:It's better than living in the Middle-East where girls aren't allowed to show any skin!
I've come to terms with it... I believe that as long as I don't have daughters myself, I will remain quite pleased with the situation.joystickjunki3 said:This is something we'll all have to come to terms w/ I think.
My theory? She was carrying it around for her parents. OR; They don't sell just-naughty things.L_Lawliet said:This happened to me a few weeks ago...
I, being the person I am, was in a GameStop just browsing. While I'm looking at a game, I hear a small voice ask an employee, "Do you have the Bratz game?" I turn around and see a small girl. I have two younger sisters and judged her to be around twelve to thirteen years old. Her parents were not with her, she was alone. Granted, that's not too strange, but was strange was what she was holding. She had two large shopping bags, one in each hand, both full. One read "GAP", the other, "Victoria's Secret".
What kind of world are we living in when little girls are going to Victoria's Secret? Moreover, "Bratz" are just mini skanks (I could use more choice language, but will not out of fear of moderation). They wear copious amounts of makeup, revealing clothing, always have to be on top of fashion, and are marketed to small children.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to buy stuff like that, but I find it sad that they feel compelled to buy it in the first place.
Comments?
There is also always the good old hover-turet.C4azyMik3 said:arg, choices choices!liamlemon7 said:Here it is mister will a 12gauge work or do you want the sawed-off mabet the combat shotgunC4azyMik3 said:then again, a sniper works just as wellSci-Fi luver437 said:Awwww I already got my Mini-Gun. XDC4azyMik3 said:does someone want me to get the shotgun?
And why would a little girl need perfume? Or lotion? To look cute and innocent for the boy they want? The girl was at an age where she probably giggles at the mention of sex.Maileigh said:It could be anything in that bag, not just lingerie. Whenever I go there I usually just buy perfume or lotion.
I wan't to add on to my note above.....Matronadena said:hey I shopped at Victoria's secret and Fredrick's and such when I was 13....but then again by 13 I was a high C, low D depending on the brand of undies, and most " average" department stores carried A) the cup size I needed but designed for " large" women. b) were made like crap so my boobs looked...awkward...for lack of a better term.
V.S's actually carries alot of average, day wear style undies, and clothes, lotions, socks, bath oils etc etc etc... not just sleek and sexy things for " romantic" events
It disgusting. Mothers are grooming their daughter into little whores from a younger and younger age. It's because of this neo-liberal feminist age we live in.L_Lawliet said:This happened to me a few weeks ago...
I, being the person I am, was in a GameStop just browsing. While I'm looking at a game, I hear a small voice ask an employee, "Do you have the Bratz game?" I turn around and see a small girl. I have two younger sisters and judged her to be around twelve to thirteen years old. Her parents were not with her, she was alone. Granted, that's not too strange, but was strange was what she was holding. She had two large shopping bags, one in each hand, both full. One read "GAP", the other, "Victoria's Secret".
What kind of world are we living in when little girls are going to Victoria's Secret? Moreover, "Bratz" are just mini skanks (I could use more choice language, but will not out of fear of moderation). They wear copious amounts of makeup, revealing clothing, always have to be on top of fashion, and are marketed to small children.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to buy stuff like that, but I find it sad that they feel compelled to buy it in the first place.
Comments?
one could also argue that the hijab/"bull-ka" is just one step closer to true equality of sexes. Not that I'm saying any girl should go and start covering their hair/face/w/e, but we live in societies that preach sex equalities, yet expect, girls to be pretty/slim etc ... etc ...Nmil-ek said:Not to mention looking like walking mailboxes.letsnoobtehpwns said:It's better than living in the Middle-East where girls aren't allowed to show any skin!
But of course! I think someone here sees what this means!Sewblon said:We are being digested by a decadent culture, spawned from a faulty amoral universe.
The summation of causation is correlation. Not that that sentence makes much sense.Khell_Sennet said:What she said.Susan Arendt said:Victoria's Secret sells cotton PJs, perfume, soap, body lotion...all sorts of things that would be perfectly appropriate for a little girl to buy. Not everything there is a merry widow or thigh highs.
And I am also massively less concerned over the unseen fashion choices of under-agers when the visible fashion they wear is way more appalling. Why get upset over expensive underwear when their pants have less fabric than a dishcloth and their tops resemble Xmas ribbon.