A Problem With Youth of Today? No.

Recommended Videos

McNinja

New member
Sep 21, 2008
1,510
0
0
ExodusinFlames said:
Really?
McNinja said:
The thing is though sex is a biological urge that can be repressed. It's not required for the survival of a person. It's not that they can't repress it, it's that they choose not to.
Its actually one of the most BASIC of human needs. Look it up. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. At the most elemental level.

Granted drugs and alcohol aren't a part of that at all, in a direct sense. Sometimes their are stupid social choices that are a part of what in essence would be the third tier of the heriarchy.
If it is so BASIC how do people go without it for so long?


ExodusinFlames said:
link670 said:
And more specifically, why half of the people doing so are in that same age category.
So just because I am 15 that means that I agree with everything my age group is doing?
Not at all, just don't pass judgements based on things you yourself haven't sampled.
That's true, but with drugs it's far more dangerous. Yes, it's not a insta kill, but after some time it will. It's like saying not wearing a seatbelt in the backseat offers more freedom, and people say "no! it's dangerous!" and you say "well, have you done it?" "no..." "don't knock it til you try it!" Then a couple months later we see someone get hit head on and the person in the backseat who wasn't wearing a seatbelt isinside of the other car after flying through both windshields. It's a big risk doing it, or not doing it, in the seatbelt case. Kinda arbitrary example, but it works.
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
AvauntVanguard said:
I'm 20. Virgin. Didn't do drugs. Haven't touched alcohol.

Are you saying -I- should be ragged on because I'm not an idiot, and have a slightly better morale compass?
No you should not be ragged on for your personal life choices, but I might rag on you for implying that people who are not virgins, do drugs and have touched alcohol are idiots and have an inferior moral compass.
 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
My friends where going to host a party (on 2 separate occasions) and eventually it was cancelled because people started arranging to get drugs and alcohol, one kid even said he had a personal drug dealer(and I trust him, this is just the kind of thing he would do.) The thing is, it's true, kids these days are like this, the are all amoral pricks.
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
AvauntVanguard said:
I'm 20. Virgin. Didn't do drugs. Haven't touched alcohol.

Are you saying -I- should be ragged on because I'm not an idiot, and have a slightly better morale compass?
I'm 20, i've been sexually active since age 17, i've smoked weed occationally and will prolly do again, and i've been drinking alchohol since age 15 (it is/was legal in denmark.
But what does that have to do with my moral compas? i've never stolen, never attacked anyone, never harrased or bullied any1, i'm always ready to help my friends and family if they need anything. So would you care to elaborate on the morale thing

EDIT: oh yeah, btw non of those things have ruined my life. I got the highest grade in my class when draguation from gymnasium, i have a good job and is currently saving up for my education as a 3d animator, i've never been in trouble with the law either, not even a parking ticket or a speeding ticket.
I've never had any STD's or caused any pregnancies because i'm smart enough to practice safe sex, i've never driven while drunk

but i guess i'm still an idiot with a bad moral compas. I'm sure you know all about how horrible and life-screwing the things you've mentioned are, seeing that you haven't done any of them.

I'm not saying theres anything wrong with you not doing any of those things, but you should honestly drop the "holier than thou" attitude.

It's personal choices without any bad moral in them, it doesn't make you a better or a worse person.
 

DarkMessiah

New member
Dec 29, 2008
238
0
0
AvauntVanguard said:
Oopsie said:
AvauntVanguard said:
I'm 20. Virgin. Didn't do drugs. Haven't touched alcohol.

Are you saying -I- should be ragged on because I'm not an idiot, and have a slightly better morale compass?
I don't see what your morale compass has to do with any of the things you have listed.
...not ruining my life?
I understand where you're coming from with drugs, though it is possible to use some without a large amount of negative effects that's really another discussion...

But if you're sensible with alcohol and you have protected sex then I really don't see how either are going to ruin your life.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Okay,

When it comes to kids having sex, I have no real problem when dealing with teens. It's part of growing up and learning about life. I *DO* have a problem when your dealing with adults having sex with teens, but that is an entirely differant discussion. What I'm talking about is Teen on Teen behavior.

It's been going on forever, and is such a part of our lifecycle that people make movies about it, write songs about it, and everything else. I feel that people that argue against this one have simply forgotten in their age about what being young was actually like, and what they learned at the time and how it influanced their later development.

Drugs on the other hand are something else. Look at say the "young drug culture" of the 1960s and 1970s and what those guys look like today (the ones who survived). That's a real issue as I see things, even if you have the money to afford your habit, I think few people with a young and healthy metabolism truely realize that they will wind up the same way if they use drugs seriously. Even when it comes to things like pot, look at guys like Cheech and Chong (the quintessential stoner-comedians). I mean really look. Funny they might be, but is that someone you REALLY want to be (either IRL, or their personas)?

Really, you look back on things and this stuff has been going on forever. All of the same issues. Kids do the same basic stuff, adults always look down on it. I guess it's just that the "information age" has given the "eternal age conflict" a new platform that pipes it into your eardrums and eyeballs 24/7 like never before.

"It has all happened before, it will all happen again" >:)

I personally find it ironic that adults can sit down and find movies like "Porky's" or "American Pie" so entertaining "hahaha, that's cool. we were actually like that. How awesome to be young" and then sit down and yell at people for being the same way they were. (and this is coming from a 34 year old).

Oh and as far as Sex goes, yes it is a powerful drive, but my arguements above aside, one of the things that seperates humanity from animals is the abillity to surpress our biological urges and act totally on rational thought. This is why things like rape are a crime.



>>>----Therumancer--->
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
AvauntVanguard said:
I'm 20. Virgin. Didn't do drugs. Haven't touched alcohol.
You poor thing.

Anyway, a look through history says the 'yoof' of today are in fact not much different to the youth of any other generation. I think older people rag on them for two main reasons. One because they nostalgise their own youth, but also (mainly) people become more aware of social problems as they grow up.
Things you don't pay attention to at 15 are very apparent by the time you're 20, at a glance it appears things are getting worse but the reality is you notice how bad they already are.
 

Aardvark Soup

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,058
0
0
Confirmation bias. People tend to remember negative things about "the youth of today" and ignore the majority of young people who simply act normal.
 

Snor

New member
Mar 17, 2009
462
0
0
the kids of today aren't stupid because of drugs and sex, that always has been there. Nowadays people are increasingly rude,narrow viewed and violent (seen in my own area that is)

they also tend to be the "stupid" kids (those with a low education) but that's the majority of the poplulation anyway as not everyone goes to college...

edit: still it's not that bad
 

Voicuboyy

New member
Apr 15, 2009
336
0
0
i don't have anything against children drinking,sexing,smoking,stupiding.. i did that myself, and i am still doing it... the problem i have with kids today is that they have their fucking retarded phases andfashions like emo,punk,anime and all that fucking stupid bullshit
 

Bediz

New member
Apr 20, 2009
124
0
0
Just chalk it up to conservative backlash. With the way Baby Boomers talk about youth today, you'd never guess they lived through the 60s and 70s.
 

Danzaivar

New member
Jul 13, 2004
1,967
0
0
AvauntVanguard said:
fix-the-spade said:
You poor thing.
Quite proud actually. Not sure what you're going on about.
He's on about the fact you're 20 and a virgin. That gets you mocked in most social circles.

You not caring is fair enough, but "not sure what you're going on about" kind of implies you don't hang around with people much. That implies little social contact, which sucks for your social growth, hence the pity.
 

implodingMan

New member
Apr 9, 2008
719
0
0
I didn't know that there are so many 13 and 14 year old kids on the Escapist until this rash of "teen" threads. Viewed in contrast with myself, I almost feel old.

The idea that hedonism and the pursuit of pleasure through substance use and sexual experimentation is solely the occupation of idiots is, to say the least, laughable. When one moves on to college or university life, the prevalence of these activities does not decrease. If only idiots did this, then wouldn't the high entrance requirements serve as a deterrent? Obviously not. People capable of achieving 90 percent averages are just as likely to partake in alcoholic consumption as anyone else. The capacity to separate "work time" and "play time" is necessary, but doesn't stop people from binge drinking on weekends or smoking weed if they have some free time.

Despite what some would tell me, I am going to chalk up a lot of attitude towards users of drugs to life inexperience. This is not to say that all sober people are basement dwellers who have no friends. The sober and abstinent people that I know, intelligent people mind you, all acknowledge that a hedonistic lifestyle is no indication of intelligence.
 

Zydrate

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,914
0
0
Danzaivar said:
He's on about the fact you're 20 and a virgin. That gets you mocked in most social circles.
To which I often reply with "Keep your STD's and babies, thanks".
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
implodingMan said:
I didn't know that there are so many 13 and 14 year old kids on the Escapist until this rash of "teen" threads. Viewed in contrast with myself, I almost feel old.

The idea that hedonism and the pursuit of pleasure through substance use and sexual experimentation is solely the occupation of idiots is, to say the least, laughable. When one moves on to college or university life, the prevalence of these activities does not decrease. If only idiots did this, then wouldn't the high entrance requirements serve as a deterrent? Obviously not. People capable of achieving 90 percent averages are just as likely to partake in alcoholic consumption as anyone else. The capacity to separate "work time" and "play time" is necessary, but doesn't stop people from binge drinking on weekends or smoking weed if they have some free time.

Despite what some would tell me, I am going to chalk up a lot of attitude towards users of drugs to life inexperience. This is not to say that all sober people are basement dwellers who have no friends. The sober and abstinent people that I know, intelligent people mind you, all acknowledge that a hedonistic lifestyle is no indication of intelligence.
Quite true. Hedonistic lifestyle does not reflect intelligence in the slightest.

What does is when it's taken to excess, or starts to replace basic survival needs.

Honestly, the vast majority of kids today are perfectly fine, and they will continue to be fine for a good long time. The only problem is that the kids who aren't perfectly fine get much, much, much more attention than any previous generation. Information flow is so much vaster than at any time in the past that the problem kids seem to be much more prevalent, and important.

Essentially: kids are kids. Most of them are fine, and the rest just need to be shot.
 
Mar 12, 2009
915
0
0
People who say kids are dumb just because they engage in immoral acts are butthurt.

For some reason this thread has reminded me of a quote from Will Self's "Dorian", the quote being:

"If we are always happy we are always good but if we are always good we are not always happy"
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Danzaivar said:
AvauntVanguard said:
fix-the-spade said:
You poor thing.
Quite proud actually. Not sure what you're going on about.
He's on about the fact you're 20 and a virgin. That gets you mocked in most social circles.
You not caring is fair enough, but "not sure what you're going on about" kind of implies you don't hang around with people much. That implies little social contact, which sucks for your social growth, hence the pity.
No, that's not quite what I was on about.

Yes I was mocking you to an extent, but the main thrust is that I think decisions based on lack of experience (or worse, based on other people's experience) are never good.
You can decide to not get drunk or have sex (drugs later), but to do so without ever having done either is denying yourself the experience to make the decision properly.
I don't drink now, but I have been drunk a few times. It was actually a lot of fun, I just don't feel the need to do it again. Similarly I know sex is best with someone you have strong feelings for, but I'd never have found that out without going through a couple of relationships first.
Drugs are a bit different, the state makes that decision for you and if you can go through life without encountering drugs, good for you. As for me, peer pressure got me into my one and only experience with drugs, never again.

The point I'm trying to make is that it's better to decide whether you should or shouldn't do something after you've given it a go. If it's legal and nobody get's hurt, why not?
 

jboking

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,694
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Danzaivar said:
AvauntVanguard said:
fix-the-spade said:
You poor thing.
Quite proud actually. Not sure what you're going on about.
He's on about the fact you're 20 and a virgin. That gets you mocked in most social circles.
You not caring is fair enough, but "not sure what you're going on about" kind of implies you don't hang around with people much. That implies little social contact, which sucks for your social growth, hence the pity.
No, that's not quite what I was on about.

Yes I was mocking you to an extent, but the main thrust is that I think decisions based on lack of experience (or worse, based on other people's experience) are never good.
You can decide to not get drunk or have sex (drugs later), but to do so without ever having done either is denying yourself the experience to make the decision properly.
I don't drink now, but I have been drunk a few times. It was actually a lot of fun, I just don't feel the need to do it again. Similarly I know sex is best with someone you have strong feelings for, but I'd never have found that out without going through a couple of relationships first.
Drugs are a bit different, the state makes that decision for you and if you can go through life without encountering drugs, good for you. As for me, peer pressure got me into my one and only experience with drugs, never again.

The point I'm trying to make is that it's better to decide whether you should or shouldn't do something after you've given it a go. If it's legal and nobody get's hurt, why not?
What if you know that you have a very addictive personality? Would you consider it smart and knowledgable to avoid semi-harmful and potentially expensive things then? I personally have a heart defect and can give in to alcohol poisioning very quickly, so drinking has been a life or death thing for me.

Ps. I match AvauntVanguard's description of himself(I am 18), probably for very different reasons though.