TheDooD said:
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
The7Sins said:
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
The7Sins said:
Well the kid supposedly was a thief. If so IMO they did not beat him enough. They should have continued to knocked out or just go the Vegas route and cut off one of his hands. Basically scar him for life and make him remember to never ever ever steal.
Are you sure that's all that happens when you physically "educate" a child though? Maybe he wouldn't steal again(and I mean "maybe"), but it's pretty fucking dumb to think that the effects end there.
I don't think children can handle beatings, period. I also think there's something perverse about adults that are willing to dole out beatings to children.
I would not care what the extra side effects would be. If it caused him to not steal again then it was for the good. Being emotionally or physically scarred for life is merely part of the consequences the punishment for theft would bring.
If I'm doing something, I like to aim for an optimal outcome...that's just me.
The idea that hitting kids can fuck them up, isn't exactly wacky and unsubstantiated. You're not only warping them in abstract and intangible ways, you're also teaching them that hitting is how issues are resolved.
When the kid frustrates you and you snap and decide that smacking the undeveloped(mentally and physically)person is the way to go, your body gives you a nice chemical reward for getting rid of that aggression. That reward makes you more likely to be aggressive the next time something ticks you off...slippery slope from there.
It really is in societies best interests to keep the aggression contained.
Holding in aggression only leads to bigger explosions of rage and or other stress related illnesses. Plus sometimes kids are THAT fucking annoying that you just have to pop'em one because they aren't smart enough for reason so the pop teaches them instantly not to do whatever they did.
OT
Where in the fuck are the kid's parents.
I've always thought that was overstated, Oprah kind of bullshit. You keep your anti-social urges bottled, or you alienate everyone around you. Your stress is your problem/malfunction, working on yourself seems like a better option than lashing out.
When you smack a kid, you're not teaching it much other than "violence solves problems, your natural role-model seems to think so"...or possibly that you're an idiot that they should get away from at the first chance that they get. When your kids leave and never visit/call you know you've fucked up, because a loving and respectful family is a joy to have.
I don't accept the notion that it's a necessary evil either. If you've earned your offspring's respect, you don't need violence at all, you can destroy them with words...they're really not thick-skinned at all.