A World without religion

Recommended Videos

chickenlord

New member
May 14, 2008
512
0
0
just watch that episode of southpark, pretty much what would happen =P http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103801
 

Stalk3rchief

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,010
0
0
I believe we would be in a very good place without religion, mostly because the majority of the worlds conflicts have been over religion. Hitler probably would have still done his bit, he'd just need a different scape goat.
This is actually kind of funny timing, I just just got back from my front door, where I had a rather amusing conversation with some people from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day-Saints. Basically, some Mormons tried to make me religious, and I told them how I fealt about it.
=D
 

Bigeyez

New member
Apr 26, 2009
1,135
0
0
Religion would be replaced with something else...Someone mentioned it earlier in this thread but Southpark pretty much nailed it with the episode Go God Go.
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
It would eliminate all the stupid wars that God/gods was used as an excuse for.
Or humans might fight over even more trivial things.

It would also take a way a great deal of entertaining myths, stories, and art.
I mean seriously Norse mythology, and some of the Old Testament stories in Christianity are really entertaining and are commonly drawn on for metaphors and such in literature, not to mention things like paintings and maybe even video games that took influence from them.
 

Nmil-ek

New member
Dec 16, 2008
2,597
0
0
khaimera said:
Cakes said:
khaimera said:
Without it its possible we could get less done becuase of the existential void we would have to face. It could lower prductivity. Relgion is what keeps many people moving forward and motivated to do good.
So, you say that if people came to the conclusion that there wasn't another life waiting for them, they'd do less in this one?

What the fuck?
I think that some would people would do less for two reasons.

First, I think that without a faith in something, many but not all, would become depressed and hopeless. Sure life may be meaningless, but that hope that there's something bigger and better awaiting is a big motivator to just get out of bed and live.

Second, I think many people are selfish and only do good things for the eternal reward they think they will receive becuase of it. How many people use morality based on religion as a guide for what to do and not do.

Death + no afterlife could be a motivator to live one's life to teh fullest, but in my experince it doesn't. Death denial is too strong.
I would argue it the exact opposite, who gives a shit if we fuck this life up not like theres not another one waiting for us! In my view people seriously, seriously disrespect sacrifice, undervalue war, death, poverty, climate change afterall if a person has such a deep rooted beleif in another life why would these things rank up as any more than trivialities or bumps in the road.
 

VGStrife

New member
May 27, 2009
143
0
0
To take away religion one would have to take away belief. Bad idea...
And this is coming from an Atheist, of all people!
 

somekindarobot

New member
Jul 29, 2009
234
0
0
Depends. What do you mean by "religion?" Do you mean belief in a deity/deities? Or belief in supernatural forces and realms, or even metaphysical forces and realms? Or code of morality and ethics? Or a philosophical worldview even if it is materialistic? Or a system of rites? Would any of it count without an organization of some sort of clerics? Would believing in anything you haven't physically experienced count as religion? Is belief in the future, then, religion?
 

LCP

New member
Dec 24, 2008
683
0
0
chiggerwood said:
LCP said:
Would be the same, because religions themselves dont cause wars, abusing the ideals does.
WOW someone actually gets it! Seriously religion has NEVER caused or started a war. It has only been a catalyst. What has started wars is power hungry people that were disgusting enough to take advantage of peoples love for their God, and their inability to read; see dark ages, or ignorance; see Westboro baptist church, which I will be quick to state that they're enough to make Jesus Christ, and God Almighty atheist. They're Christians in the same way suicide bombers are Muslim.
I laugh at all these optimists thinking, OMG no war, intolerance OMG OMG. But I know even if you try to explain it to them, at the end of the day, you are just wearing down your keyboard.
 

chponge

New member
Aug 26, 2009
8
0
0
well i will admit that family guy's idea could actually be right.... but i think there would have been less wars because of religon
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
I suspect some mass suicide in the distant past.

It was dark and harsh times back then, almost all cultures dreamt up some sort of religion to make some sense of it all. It was almost a survival mechanism in itself for man to cope, hope, and live on.
 

MR T3D

New member
Feb 21, 2009
1,424
0
0
there are/were always those whom belive(d) in only what they saw and therefore knew.
IMO the world would be much better off without religion now, see Bill Mahr's movie religilious. seriously has no pllace in modern society, and only serves to hold us back.
 

danielje

New member
Aug 30, 2009
58
0
0
I doubt you'd see much difference in way of lack of religion.

Basically you'd still have religion, people would worship some higher power. Be it, science, or a deity, they will worship it.

There will be dogmas, and people will congregate with similar beliefs to discuss or listen about them.

To try and picture a world without religion is like to try and imagine a robot with a sense of self awareness. That robot HAS to recognize that it is a creation, it HAS to wonder what created it, and it HAS to assume that that being(or other machine) is its superior in a way it may never understand.

You cannot undo the nature of existence. Only the VOID has no creator, only the VOID can sustain existence. Because a creator must have no beginning, or end. It must exist forever, even if the very nature of its existence, is non-existence.

Human beings have already shifted to worshiping Science in the stead of an ethereal being. After millennia of worshiping science, what will be next?

It is entirely feasible and likely, that eventually human beings will choose to worship the idea that there is no creator whatsoever, they may in fact choose to believe sometime down the road that they have always existed in such an enlightened and sophisticated state. They have always been, and will always be. They themselves are creators, and possibly the gods of this realm, they were not themselves created in away, be it through science or religion. They have simply always been.

The idea of "A world without religion" is truly intriguing, but like the VOID, all voids must be filled. In this case, it is 100% likely that the void would be filled with something so strikingly similar to religion, that there would be almost no change whatsoever. Or maybe we'd be five thousand years more advanced, because we'd have worshiped science to begin with.

Who can say, right? Great topic.
 

Venatio

New member
Sep 6, 2009
444
0
0
This question is stupid, religion was vital to humanitys rise to begin with. Religion gave us a light in the darkness, reason in our lives, an origin and a place in the world. Untill science came along all we had to face this cruel world was what we had at hand and the refuge of our minds.

Besides if we didnt have religion then Christian Monks wouldnt have discovered how to make coffee, soda or Mendel and his study of genetics (I listed these accomplishements in order of importance). There are countless things that have been influenced by religion for better or worse, and even as an Atheist I wouldnt have it any other way.
 

Kriptonite

New member
Jul 3, 2009
1,049
0
0
The world might actually be a worse place to live in. Now now now, atheists out there listen before you respond please, I myself am agnostic(I have changed, if you look at any of my previous posts in religion threads, I said I was atheist) and immediately thought that a world without religion would be SWEET, but then I had a thought. Imagine if you will, a world where hundreds of thousands(if not more) of people have not died in pointless religious wars and such. There would be that many more people in history, plus how many more today. We are already nearing our carrying capacity and if that many people had lived, the problem would loom much closer if not upon us now. SO, I ask you atheists specifically, would it really be a better place? Yes, you wouldn't have to deal with the nonsense of people that are overly devout and talk your ear off and people going dorr-to-door to hand out pamphlets that people just burn anyway. Woah, got off track there, anyway, any questions or comments or what-not, just drop me a message.
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
Glefistus said:
dmase said:
Glefistus said:
Sonicron said:
What would the world look like without religion...? Severely overpopulated, I'd say.
Ah, but do the Abrahamic religions not teach about "spreading your seed"?

dmase said:
Genocides that happened 3/4 of which probably wouldn't have happened.
Hitler not nearly as powerful.
Great architectural, artisitc, and scientific achievements to glorify god probably wouldn't be built.
Great architechural, artisitc, and scientific achievments would probably have happened sooner or come about.( it works both ways if i'm looking at history the right way.
Wars of the ages would be decreased.
Less charity in the world and morals possibly.
and.... fps's uncensored in Germany and playboy for any age in America.

that seems.... fair with a neutral swing in all but i could be wrong.
Hitler's rise to power had next to nothing to do with religion, it was about ideology and getting back at those damned French for the treaty of Versailles and the Ruhr valley humiliation.
German's were pissed in General but Hitler more or less was powered by religous zealoutism. A state needs an enemy that is the devil, jewish people helps motivate them in to taking jewish property which helped finiance the war and partial reason to tell the people why they needed to invade other countries to wipe out an unclean race based on there religon more than anything. They also wanted to spread the thought of a supreme race which made every german want to be aryan, aryan being based off race but more than anything i think it was connected to religon. Every ruler uses god as a reason, just look at every modern decleration of war most say that a higher power we'll kick the other guy's ass. I think that the German people would have given up like in WWI, before a real invastion of Germany, if not for religon driving them on. (just an opinion)
But the Jews are an ethnic group of their own, so it wasn't necessarily based on religion. Also, remember that they weren't the only ones the Nazis "cleansed".

The Nazis based the concept of a "superior race" on a flawed view of genetics, and a will to better the German nation through Eugenics.

Last, did the German people not have religion in WWI? The reason they surrendered was to avoid more losses in the face of inevitable defeat. The Nazis didn't surrender when they reached that point because of ideology, and high command's fanatical devotion to the führer, who didn't want them to ever surrender.

EDIT: for a summary, ideologies are not religions.
But through his political and religious reasoning he established in 1933, a German Reich Christian Church, uniting the Protestant churches to instill faith in a national German Christianity.

Future generations should remember that Adolph Hitler could not have come into power without the support of the Protestant and Catholic churches and the German Christian populace.

quote from, http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

I'm gonna tell you the facts look like he came to power with religon whether or not he cared more about his political power or religous belief. Seems as tho mein kampf had a lot of religous fanatsicm that influenced the german people. They had religon in WWI but they didn't make the war a religous thing it was a political gamble that as forced on them by the system of alliances, theywanted to go to war but not with the whole goddamn continent(as my teacher would say). WWII was getting back like you said but also they were infuenced to keep fighting by HItler and the beliefs he instilled in the German people. They would have given up when the allies started invading but they kept being pushed to fight by those beliefs, partially religous. I'm not saying that Hitler wouldn't have come to power at all with religon but it played more than a small part in his rise and WWII.
 

Numb1lp

New member
Jan 21, 2009
968
0
0
ArcWinter said:
Not that different, although more focus on the earlier arts during the Middle Ages.

Eh, that's all I can think of. Also, less excuses for wars.
Damn, you're right... Guess we'll have to get a bit more creative.