I know that, which is why one hand people are "kind of" right when they say "they ruined the brotherhood!" in FO3. But theyre also kind of wrong in that they didnt [i/]change[/i] the brotherhood...just took a loophole with the "splinter" factionTizzytheTormentor said:A lot of people tended to leave Mr House at that point, but no faction in the Mojave likes the brotherhood and want's them gone, NCR gets pissed off if you secure a treaty (It results in the best Brotherhood ending, but you get chewed out) Legion want's them gone, House knew they would disagree with him and wanted them out of the picture and even Yes Man is happy to see them gone and disappointed if you spared them (like the great khans) The Brotherhood in F:NV is way different to F:3, The outcasts of 3 were the proper representation of the actual Brotherhood (and I hate the actual Brotherhood, bunch of xenophobic dickholes) I love Veronica though, only reason I didn't want to harm the Brotherhood.
in a way, even though FO3 and NV arnt related much it makes me think from a long term perspective the FO3 brotherhood may be on a better track in that they have a clear and posative influence in the district...rather than a shifty group everyone hates (though many seem to disgaree with me)
I just think there are better ways to deal with the brotherhood than wiping them out..they arnt all bad...(like veronica)
but anyway...I may have to replay fallout:NV to see if things apear differently (though TBH it feels like it has less replayability due to the amount of hours Ive put in and also reloading saves all the time to see different outcomes)